Paul Revere by Cyrus Dallin, North End, Boston

~~~

~~~

GALLUP: Trump Job Approval Rating Now at 34%, New Low

.

.
.

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

The Last Word




The Last Word:

I've been told that the people of the now famous pornography blog known as "Who's Your Daddy," continue to deny what they have encouraged and published there and that one of their excuses is that what (O)CT(O)PUS wrote about is old and happened years ago, so who cares.  

That's what desperate people who have been caught acting like degenerates and who are deeply ashamed, but too cowardly to admit it, always say.  It's classic.  Deny, deny, and direct blame elsewhere.  In this case, to the victim.

Fortunately, rational people can see through their diabolical finger-pointing and attempts at deflecting responsibility for their evil behavior.  As the perceptive Capt. Fogg of The Swash Zone so eloquently noted about Lisa and her pals:  

Parties,blogs and persuasions of her sort are refuges for inconsequential losers who think they can win something by being disgusting. If one fails in all other respects in life, one can always find acceptance and a good buddy of sorts at the bottom of the barrel.

To once again set the record straight, I will document here what was just recently published on Lisa's  blog (NOTE:  Radical Redneck refers to me as "Chaw"):




FROM LISA'S BLOG, "Who's Your Daddy:"            
Chaw is sucking worthless raghead dick...again. Hey dipshit, they may have darker skin but THEY ARE NOT BLACK. They do not count as a "get" with your insatiable jungle fever. This deranged self-hatred is never going away until you head to the 'hood, pick up a thug gaggle and resemble a negroe porcupine with the countless pricks going in you.

2. Reply


WARNING:   The link below goes to a porn site that Radical Redneck left on Lisa's blog and that Lisa scrubbed ONLY when she was shamed into doing so.  


VIEWER DISCRETION ADVISED!  PROCEED ON YOUR OWN VOLITION! 

What you will see at this porn link is what a friend of Lisa calls "harmless pranks."  If these links and messages from Redneck to me are nothing more than harmless pranks, I ask anyone who sincerely believes that if he or she would read or watch these "harmless pranks" with children.  Harmless?  See for yourself:





Res ipsa loquitur

21 comments:

Duckys here said...

Where does (s)he find this stuff?

Not a healthy individual.

Rational Nation USA said...

Apparently (s)he has a few not so healthy individuals helping her/him, or at the very least encouraging her or him.

It's most definitely a alternative reality over there.

skudrunner said...

That is one of the side effects of having a non-moderated blog.

Granted some on her site are over the edge and she should clean it up but if it is non-moderated, stuffs going to get posted that is not acceptable.

Dave Miller said...

Yes Skud, you are correct... and then you delete it without responding or encouraging it.

That is how responsible people deal with issues like this if they choose to go the un moderated route.

Now if it a problem, and the amount of smut being posted is so excessive you can't keep up, then again, a responsible person would switch to comment moderation.

Am I missing something here?

skudrunner said...

Comment moderation is similar to censoring but it is the persons blog so it is their right to do what they want.

Whatever happened to if I don't want to read, hear or see something I just turn it off or don't go there. Guess that's to much to expect from either side.

Dave Miller said...

Skud, you're deflecting...

Aren't there instances where people should not have to turn away to avoid filth?

Do you have kids? What if right on the main shelf of magazines in the store there was an entire display of Mary's massive Juggs? How about Franks Fallick Fantasys? All displayed with no covers and right out in the open.

Using your logic, anyone could just turn away, but thankfully, there are some standards that we all try to follow. Standards that say this type of material is better left behind the counter and many times, covered up until someone wishes to see it.

Moderation is not censorship at all. It's control, and if people choose not to exercise control over what gets posted on their sites, I dare say they are responsible for that content, especially when they encourage it.

Jerry Critter said...

skud - "Whatever happened to if I don't want to read, hear or see something I just turn it off or don't go there."

That's what I do.

Far be it for me to disparage porn, but if I want it, I go directly to the porn site, not some rightwing wacko's blog. It is interesting, though, the connection between the rightwing blogs, porn, and family values.

I think I'm glad I did not grow up in a Republican family.

Shaw Kenawe said...

TO ANYONE WHO RECENTLY LEFT A COMMENT HERE:

I inadvertently hit the "delete" button instead of the "publish" button.

I did read the comments and regret losing them.

Next time: Coffee first, read comments second.

(O)CT(O)PUS said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
skudrunner said...

legs,

Got it, you disagree with some of my opinions but from my view that is a good thing for both of us. Instead of spewing hatred toward me why don't you put up some facts where I am wrong.

JC
Glad we agree

David
"but thankfully, there are some standards that we all try to follow."
Agreed, just don't go there because you know what you will find. It is kind of like a car wreck blocking traffic, some just can't help but gawk.

Shaw Kenawe said...

skudrunner, may I ask why YOU visit that blog? There are many other conservative blogs that you frequent and comment on. Why do you keep going back to a blog that not only allows filthy porn but encourages it by featuring the perps who publish it?

I'm just curious why anyone would want to be contaminated by a cesspool like that.

"Birds of a feather..." "Show me your friends, and I'll tell you what you are..."

And why come here if you think it is WE who are in the Dark Ages?

NOTE: Some internet troll who goes by the name "FJ," has accused me of featuring "porn" on my blog. Good luck with that, troll, you'll never discover it here. And that is so typical of extremist right wing tactics: accuse the victim of doing precisely what has been done to her. No different from the creeps on the right who believe women deserve to be raped because they dress the way they do. This is all of a piece of the anti-women ethos that infects the extreme fringes of the Republican Party.

Please NOTE, I do not mean every Republican/conservative/libertarian, just the degenerates who believe women deserve to be humiliated and degraded because of their political views.

skudrunner said...

Much of what is posted on your blog I agree with so it is not all bad. The blog you refer to has not always been so trashy and there are some rational people, just not lately.

I try and look at both sides of an opinion although in today's charged environment it is difficult because few are rational. I will admit to being in somewhere in the middle of a lot of opinions because I am a fiscal conservative and a social liberal. I also believe all politicians are nothing but crooks who only do for themselves.

(O)CT(O)PUS said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Shaw Kenawe said...

Another note here to set the record straight:

I never said I would quit blogging.

FACT

I suspended my blog while the issues covered below were published and discussed.

Anyone who claims I said I would quit blogging is a liar. And I'm not surprised at where that lie came from --a hopeless idiot and blog gossip.

(Thank you, R.D. for the heads-up.)

A Reader Not A Blogger said...

Written by a right-wing nitwit reacting to shaw calling out the porn blog:

"So this is the ultimate end of "Progressive mentality"—the bully-boy tactics of Bolshevism full blown across the internet, forcing conformation to the "diktats" laid down by those that are incapable of tolerating another point of view outside their stinking orthodoxy."

These asshats are incapable of seeing the evil that they are. This particular nitwit and the hog-headed blogger he visits are defending pornographers who put smut up on their blog and who threatened shaw with assault?

These people can't smell their own sh*t, so they enjoy wallowing in it.

(O)CT(O)PUS said...

TO: A Reader Not a Blogger,

There is more from the same wayward loon whom you quoted:

And it was the Bolsheviks themselves that made "anti-Semitism" a crime. and the crime of being caught in possession of the publication "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" was to be shot on the spot, decreed by the first name in "progress", V.I. Lenin.

Wayward loon is the Franz Liebkind of The Cringe Fringe.

A Reader Not A Blogger said...

I'm always astounded at the fact that these antiSemitic asshats still survive. At some point they will die out or be laughed into obscurity by the rest of the world. They sicken me and should sicken any decent person.

skudrunner said...

Legs
Your condemnation is noted but
if you look at all I have posted I have never called Shaw names, never acted in a demeaning manner or held her in disrespect. We may disagree politically but the I have never reverted to personal attacks.

You seem you seem to have issues that I am not professionally qualified to solve.

(O)CT(O)PUS said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Jerry Critter said...

"...you seem to have issues that I am not professionally qualified to solve.”

Seems like a personal attack to me.

(O)CT(O)PUS said...

Jerry,
More than a personal attack, it is also a provocation. I had hoped this series of articles on cyber bullying would bring positive change. Regrettably, I see only business as usual.