Shaw Kenawe
We don’t know that.
But the Epstein emails show Epstein himself stating that Trump was alone with one of the girls for hours in Epstein’s mansion. Also, we have evidence that Trump and Epstein celebrated “ their secret”. Don’t you wonder what secret they shared?
Beyond all that, though, what the Epstein scandal shows is that very wealthy very powerful men were engaged with Epstein in raping children. Doesn’t that turn your stomach?
But the Epstein emails show Epstein himself stating that Trump was alone with one of the girls for hours in Epstein’s mansion. Also, we have evidence that Trump and Epstein celebrated “ their secret”. Don’t you wonder what secret they shared?
Beyond all that, though, what the Epstein scandal shows is that very wealthy very powerful men were engaged with Epstein in raping children. Doesn’t that turn your stomach?
FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
Trump and Epstein's secret? That under hypergamy, the rich can grab any woman by the p*ssy, and she will love him for it. Cuz that's how she can draft on his wealth and social position.
All those underage girls hanging out with Jeff & Ghislaine? They were all playing the hypergamy game. Only when the sun came up and the "Prince" hadn't put the slipper on their feet, they blamed Ghislaine, when they should have simply looked in the mirror to see whom they should blame.
All those underage girls hanging out with Jeff & Ghislaine? They were all playing the hypergamy game. Only when the sun came up and the "Prince" hadn't put the slipper on their feet, they blamed Ghislaine, when they should have simply looked in the mirror to see whom they should blame.
November 15, 2025 at 9:27 AM
-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
Turn my stomach? There are only 13 US States (& Virgin Islands) where the age of consent is 18. In my state, Maryland, its' 16.
They weren't raping children.. The children all appeared to be consenting... or they would have all reported it immediately to the authorities rather than keep playing the hypergamy game.
They weren't raping children.. The children all appeared to be consenting... or they would have all reported it immediately to the authorities rather than keep playing the hypergamy game.
November 15, 2025 at 9:35 AM
-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
btw - Why was Trump responsible for spilling the beans on Epstein's hypergamy game? Every woman on the planet was playing it.
November 15, 2025 at 9:40 AM
-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
Trump was merely practicing hypogamy (the opposite game).
***********************
He said Maxwell was involved in recruiting the girls.
Mr Recarey testified that only two of the girls had any massage experience and the majority of them were under the age of 18.
When asked how Epstein was able to gain access to so many underage girls the detective said: "Each of the victims that went to the home were asked to bring their friends to the home."
Some were paid to recruit, he said, adding: "When they went to perform a massage, it was for [Epstein's] sexual gratification."
***********************
According to people like -FJ, those wily underage girls were practicing "hypergamy," in order to trick Epstein and Maxwell into giving them a financially better life.
Poor Epstein and Maxwell and Trump! All victims of underage girls practicing what all females practice: The age-old deceptive craft of hypergamy!
T
NOTE: Most of the victims in the Epstein scandals were NOT "women," they were underage girls.
BROUGHT OVER FROM A POST BELOW:
ReplyDelete-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
btw - How old were you at your first kiss? Making out session? All the way? All of mine were between 15-18. And it was always at the risk of an assault-rape charge that never came, because there was always "consent".
SK: You keep avoiding the fact that these underage girls were being sexually assaulted by uber wealthy and powerful 40 & 50-year old men. What teenagers do in the back seat of a car is NOT THE SAME THING! Your examples are pure B.S.
November 15, 2025 at 9:50 AM
-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
The difference between you and me is that I refuse to virtue signal my own hypocrisies.
November 15, 2025 at 9:51 AM
SK: But you don't refuse to signal your warped sense of humanity, do you. Thanks for letting us look into your psyche. I think. Yikes!
-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
e-r-r-r-r-p! "Heinous crimes"
November 15, 2025 at 9:51 AM
-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
There only one difference between Trump, Epstein, and every male on this thread...opportunity. The same could be said for all the "victims" and women here. Opportunity.
November 15, 2025 at 9:56 AM
SK: I've been on this Earth longer than you, -FJ, and I can confidently state that you do NOT speak for all men. I'm thankful no one with your cynical view of females and males EVER was in my life. That's not to say they don't exist, you prove that. And it is NOT virtue signaling when I say there's a reason those kind of males were NOT in my life. You figure it out.
-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
Ooops, did I just speak the "unwritten rules" of human sexuality out loud? My bad!
November 15, 2025 at 10:00 AM
SK: We all make choices in life. We now know where you stand on human sexuality and on adult males sexually exploiting underage girls. Thanks for enlightening us.
...all done under the watchful eyes of MI-6, CIA, and MOSAD.
DeleteI don't give a flying donut which spy agencies were involved. They used underage girls for their sexual gratifications and nefarious/spy games. Those girls were victims. I don't care about the rich and powerful pigs who used them. May cosmic justice pursue them for all the days of their rotten lives
DeleteYet you demand Trump report to authorities what they already knew and sanctioned...
DeleteThat's what a decent human being would have done. And that's why Trump didn't do it. Whether or not the corrupt Florida authorities did anything or not, a decent person would have intervened in some way.
Delete.... and no, a "decent" human being would never be given an opportunity to indulge their libido at a Diddy Freak-off Party, or a trip to Epstein Island on the Lolita Express. For if they were, very few would remain "decent".
Delete...as Epstein's "room" is where the "deals" of men like Trump, Clinton, and Prince Andrew's Britain were made. It's where foreign leaders and diplomats caroused with billionaires. A very "hypergamy-hypogamy rich" environment, indeed.
ReplyDelete"It's where foreign leaders and diplomats caroused with billionaires." And raped underage girls. You left that out.
Delete...which is why the tapes and records will never be fully disclosed.
ReplyDeleteWe know that. The rich and powerful seldom pay for their crimes.
DeleteNor do those who deliberately censor to create an inaccurate/ false narrative.
DeleteAnd THAT be tRump, you, and the tRumublican party minus man.
DeleteShaw... let's not forget or overlook as -FJ I'm sure is prone to do, the comments of former NBC and FOX News Reporter Megan Kelly on Epstein...
ReplyDeleteIn conversation with [Very MAGA Supportive] NewsNation host Batya Ungar-Sargon, Megyn Kelly said that a person closely associated with the case held the view that Epstein was not a pedophile.
She said that the late financier preferred girls who looked like they could be legal, rather than those under the age of 10. “As for Epstein, I’ve said this before, but just as a reminder, I do know somebody very, very close to this case who is in a position to know virtually everything,” Kelly said. “Not everything, but virtually everything. And this person has told me from the start years and years ago that Jeffrey Epstein, in this person’s view, was not a pedophile.”
“He was into the barely legal type, like he liked 15 year old girls…He wasn't into like 8 year olds. But he liked the very young, like teen types… that would look legal to a passerby.
A man his age, having sex with a 15 year old girl, regardless of how she looked, is statutory rape in every state in the union. Why is she struggling to excuse Epstein? Why is -FJ? Why is anyone defending the guy and the convicted felon Maxwell?
IMO, it's another piece of evidence of the moral rot eating at our country.
DeleteThe wall (-FJ) speaks. The only thing he gets right is that the rich and powerful will always protect the rich and powerful. Just as the church has always protected it's priests, bishops, pastors...
ReplyDeleteUgh. I stopped reading anything FJ and its other personalities write as I always feel like I need to take a shower after to get rid of the grossness 🤢
ReplyDeleteHey -FJ... you got a daughter, sister or grand daughter? How about you apply your logic to them. Do you aspire to see your grand daughters, 15 and under, giving it up to a rich dude? You think it's alright, legal or not?
ReplyDeleteI deal with this stuff all the time in Mexico. 30 year old men taking girls ages 13, 14 & 15, cause they're young, hot and tight. It's wrong and disgusting.
I'm sure that's how you want ppl to think about your family.
You're sick dude. And Trump did it to you. You need a shrink. Get some help.
Perhaps FJ is a Stephen Miller wannabee?
ReplyDeleteCan FJ explain why Trump makes Caligula look like a Boy Scout?
ReplyDelete"Joe Conservative
ReplyDelete.... and no, a 'decent' human being would never be given an opportunity to indulge their libido at a Diddy Freak-off Party, or a trip to Epstein Island on the Lolita Express. For if they were, very few would remain 'decent'."
The world knows that Epstein was an evil, rich and powerful scoundrel who said of Trump, "[He's] the worst person he’d ever known and ‘dangerous." And, "I have met some very bad people ... none as bad as Trump,"
That's an evil criminal describing his former BEST friend, whom he partied with for years.
That man was elected TWICE by the American electorate (never winning the popular vote). That illustrates how America has morally declined, and I'm not sure we'll ever recover.
I'm fairly sure we won't. Unless the younger generations root out capitalism and kill it.
ReplyDeleteThought I wrote a comment on this post but don't see it so...
ReplyDeleteinterwebz, hope it was nummy. I did add the extra saucy stuff you like so I shouldn't be surprised. No, won't repeat what I said. It was hard enough to write the first time. If you are a survivor, you know. If you've never had your agency ripped away without consequences or retribution... well, thank your lucky stars you've not been subjected to such experiences. As fate teaches, everyone and anyone can land on that special square. It's how we respond that defines our character. Interwebz, what a kooky character!
That said, masked in all the kerfluffle about Trump being exactly as many of us said he is was the news that yes, if you are a SNAP recipient you must re-apply to receive benefits. Good catch Dave Miller. I wouldn't have caught the story if my ears and eyes hadn't been alerted by your comment.
No details provided as to whether or not the new requirement means one must start at the beginning aka placing one's name on a list to enter the SNAP lottery to receive benefits in the first place or if one just needs to recertify. The fact those in charge don't know the difference is just icing on this crap cake they keep trying to convince WeThePeople isn't the poop we can all clearly see and smell.
In three red states the head of the agency found a little over 100K recipients who were deceased (the agency head was gushing as to how much fraud she'd find in blue states forgetting about the database shared by like minded states which constantly monitors newly awarded benefits in participating states and sends a notice to the original state to end benefits there. When the Trump admin took power many red states withdrew from the program stating it was filled with fraud - no evidence of this but nothing like a good story to rile up the base). No details as to how long these "fraud cases" had been on the roles. One does have thirty days to notify the issuing authority so maybe the paperwork hadn't been processed yet? I mean, 100K vs millions of participants is an error rate of under one percent. Seems like they are searching for missing pennies when their dear leader is tossing millions and billions around like tic tacs. Anything to make the poors live worse I guess.
By the way does anyone know if the missing emergency SNAP monies has been located yet? Has anyone looked? I'm betting the Trump Admin knows exactly where the monies were transferred but won't say because of... reasons.
Was the comment on this post by Anonymous, dated Nov. 15 @1:00PM from you? I haven’t seen one from you before this comment I’m responding to. Let me know and I’ll check my comments in moderation.
DeleteIt is astounding to read grown men and women blaming underage girls for 40, 50, 60, etc., year old men sexually assaulting them, claiming they do it to gain financial advantage. This is where I see people losing their humanity and justifying statutory rape because their corrupt and criminal leader, Trump, is involved in Epstein’s emails. Gawd only knows what’s in the files. The same files Trump promised his cultists he’d release as soon as he was elected.
What happened to that?
He's quivering in fear. As he should. The only real important question is will his party finaly grow the pair it needs and neuter the the filthy SOB. My guess a toss up as things are getting a bit fluid.
DeleteNo worries about the lost comment. I knew the interwebz ate it when I hit publish and my screen giggled. Well, that was something then, wasn't it?
DeleteGrey, So maybe by having to re-apply we can get an accurate number of people on SNAP who shouldn't be. My guess is a lot more but maybe we will see. Do you have an objection to reducing fraud.
ReplyDeleteLes, I wouldn't worry about the abolishment of capitalism. The elimination or at least shrinking has been happening for decades. We are no longer a country of exceptional people but of a system that rewards mediocrity and punishes success.
skud, you don't know the reason there is under 3% fraud in an agency that handles millions of recipients and accounts for billions of dollars is the very process the Trump admin interrupted and you seem to believe does not exist. If you had spent five minutes asking your favorite source of AI you wouldn't have made your uninformed assumptions.
DeleteNice tag along though - can't address the substance of my comment so you just have to close with the gotcha. Putz. So, do I have an objection to reducing fraud. What a question to ask here, where you've read my comments before. Seriously, putz.
For the record (again), I am a fully owned subsidiary of the United States government via Social Security and Medicare and by my state through Medicaid and SNAP. Every six months I (and everyone in the same boat as myself) must ((MUST)) submit a copy of our utility bills and latest bank account statement. All our totals must match/align with what was submitted the previous recertification. Any deviation and letters are sent to the client to explain themselves. They have the end of the month to comply or they lose their benefits and have to start at the end of the line. Once I aged into Social Security Retirement I no longer had to recertify for Social Security and I was no longer limited to $1000 in my bank account. Try saving for anything with those kinds of limitations on a person.
Since you brought up the topic skud please enlighten the class as to how this process is rife with fraud? Waiting for your answer but not holding my breath. I already know you simply repeat what you've been told. Not an original thought in your head.
By the way, I use the word putz for you because you could do better but you chose to not so yeah, putz.
Capitalism's history, since its birth in Europe, has been one of the single most damaging phenomenon the world has ever experienced. Its death should be everyone's wish and desire. Kill the beast of Capitalism and the world might stand a chance at happiness, contentment, and peace. Income inequality is reversed under democratic socialism and the welfare of people supersedes the welfare of mega corporations.
ReplyDeleteSure Skud... maybe you missed my comment earlier that Grey alluded to. I'm okay with recertifying people and I'm sure Grey is too. But right now, get them their benefits and let them "reapply" while their application is in the system.
ReplyDeleteBesides, I know you know but will never say it, my suggestion is both fair and reasonable. But for the Trump Admin, the pain is the plan is the point is the policy.
How do vote for such people? Sure the Dems screw up, but generally, the pain is visited on those who can afford it, not the "least of these" among us.
Pro life? Not a chance.
David, I in fact do agree with you that they should restart benefits and set reasonable time to re-apply. Like most things the government does, finding the best possible solution is placed aside so the bureaucracy can go to full tilt. IOW make a simple solution so complex it takes a bureaucrat to understand it.
ReplyDeleteTrump was elected to make Washington more efficient and that is a task no one can perform in four years. It took his predecessor for years to totally screw things up with his billions spend to exacerbate the problems and solving nothing. Give away billions and then complain prices are to high. Then shut down the government because you didn't get your way of extending a program your president said was temporary.
Skud... you give and then you take away.
ReplyDeleteDespite your protestations, everything bad in DC did not come from Biden or Obama. Nor in our case, from Trump. But since he's in office, that's where we focus.
I remember when Obama took office and blamed, correctly, the Bush Admin for driving us off a cliff financially. Many of your pre MAGA buddies said knock it off, it's now the Biden Admin.
When will you follow that advice and just own it... Trump is cancer on the GOP and America.
And therein lies the very root of America's problems. Ignorance and greed displayed by the capitalist oligarchs. All of which the elite MAGAts wholeheartedly support.
ReplyDeleteDave, I didn't say anything about obama so you just added that as a dig, got it but you can be more creative in your attacks.
ReplyDeleteI happen to agree with you that trump is like a cancer that we will have to endure for three more years. Hopefully by then both parties can field decent candidates instead of the criminal and the imbecile. The country was founded with citizen legislators who had to hold a job to survive so they had a connection with the average American. They are now career politicians who become multi-millionaires and consider themselves elite, ask nancy mace who pitched a fit at an airport worker because she is above the masses.
Les, You have a dislike for millionaires and billionaires who are responsible for running companies that produces something. You have admiration for politicians, as long as they are democrats, who are millionaires and don't produce anything. You do realize that the majority of billionaires are democrats but where is your disdain for tem.
Wrong again skud. I have nothing against work, the results of ones work, or the benefits one accrued from one's work and investments. In so long as they pay their fair share in taxes that contributes to the general welfare of all.
DeleteWhat I am against is ignorance, delusion, greed, dishonesty, authoritarianism, fascism, racism, misogyny, patriarchy, white supremacist views, indecency, lack of compassion and empathy, predatory capitalism, the great income disparity that exists in America today.
Your years of conditioning and kissing the ass of the man shows skud.
You can try to pigeonhole me in your illusory beliefs about me skud but all you do is bring a broad grin to my lips. Neither you or anyone else defines me or what my views are. Your illusions/delusions spring from your own obscured mind.
skud, I asked AI if the majority of billionaires are Democrats. Here's what I got:
ReplyDeleteWhile billionaires' individual affiliations vary, recent data on political donations indicates that a majority of the money from billionaire families heavily favors the Republican Party. This trend is especially pronounced in their political contributions rather than their personal identification.
Donation Patterns:
Analysis of campaign finance data shows that a significant majority of political contributions from the wealthiest Americans support Republican candidates and conservative causes. For the 2024 election cycle, reports indicate that roughly 70% of donations from the top 100 billionaire families went to the GOP.
The pattern in donations often reflects the desire to preserve wealth, with tax policies being a primary concern. Many billionaires and wealthy donors support candidates they believe will advocate for lower taxes and favorable regulations, which are commonly associated with the Republican platform.
Major Donors: A small group of major donors accounts for a large percentage of total billionaire contributions. In recent cycles, many of the largest individual donors have been solidly Republican/Conservative.
Party Identification: When asked about personal party identification, some surveys have found that while billionaires are more likely to be Republican than the general public, their individual votes are not always uniform. A 2020 survey of U.S. billionaires found they skewed more Republican in affiliation (43% Republican vs. 24% Democrate.
The biggest con the Republican Party has perpetrated on the middle class, working class, and the poor is that they care about them. The Republican Party is for the 1%. Period.
Ms. Shaw, What the information you provided that is conservatives donate more money than liberals not that there are more republican billionaires than democrat billionaires.
ReplyDeleteAlso From AI
Overall Amount and Rate: Conservative households have been found to give, on average, a higher percentage of their income to charity than liberal households.