Wednesday, January 21, 2026

"The generals think Trump's Greenland plan is crazy and illegal."


Rachel Hurley on Facebook:


So Trump ordered the military to invade Greenland, and the generals told him to fuck off.


Not hypothetically. He actually ordered it. The Joint Special Operations Command got the directive - draw up invasion plans for Greenland. And the Joint Chiefs of Staff said no. Because it’s illegal. Because Denmark is a NATO ally. Because you can’t just invade our friends.


The Daily Mail broke the story on January 11th. According to their sources: “The generals think Trump’s Greenland plan is crazy and illegal. So they are trying to deflect him with other major military operations. They say it’s like dealing with a five-year-old.”


They’re trying to distract the President with other wars. How about we intercept Russian ghost ships? Or hit Iran? Literally anything except invading Denmark.


This came after two weeks of escalating threats. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on January 6th that “utilizing the U.S. Military is always an option” for Greenland. Stephen Miller went on CNN and refused to rule out force. He said “nobody’s going to fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland.”


Denmark said hold my beer.


Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned that a U.S. attack on Greenland would mean the end of NATO. Not a diplomatic strain. The end. “If the United States chooses to attack another NATO country militarily, then everything stops.”


And then eight European countries deployed troops. Germany, France, Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands, the UK, Finland - all sent forces for Operation Arctic Endurance. On January 19th, General Peter Boysen, Chief of the Royal Danish Army, arrived in Greenland with combat soldiers trained in Arctic warfare and announced he’s ready to defend the territory.


Trump’s response? Tariffs. On January 17th he announced 10% tariffs on all eight European allies, rising to 25% by June 1st, until “a Deal is reached for the Complete and Total purchase of Greenland.”


He’s threatening a trade war against NATO allies because they’re defending themselves against us.


Let’s talk about why the military said no.


The UN Charter prohibits the threat or use of force against any state’s territorial integrity. The NATO Treaty obligates us to defend Denmark. We have 21 bilateral defense agreements with Denmark since 1950.


An order to invade Greenland violates international law, domestic law, and seven decades of treaty obligations. The Uniform Code of Military Justice requires refusal of unlawful orders. Military members swear an oath to “support and defend the Constitution,” not obey the president unconditionally.


A Washington Post op-ed spelled it out: “Confronted with an order from President Trump and Secretary Hegseth to seize Greenland from a treaty ally with whom we are at peace, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine must reasonably and in good conscience decline to transmit, and relevant four-star combatant commanders refuse to execute, that order as illegal.”


Here’s what makes Venezuela different. On January 3rd, the U.S. captured Nicolás Maduro. That succeeded because Maduro had federal indictments, it was framed as law enforcement, and Venezuela isn’t a NATO ally.


Trump’s team thought that success meant they could keep going. Stephen Miller and other “policy hawks” pushed for immediate Greenland action “before Russia or China makes a move.”


Diplomatic cables describe a “worst-case scenario” where invasion leads to “the destruction of NATO from the inside.” Some European officials suspect that’s the actual goal. “Since Congress would not allow Trump to exit NATO, occupying Greenland could force the Europeans to abandon NATO.”


House Speaker Mike Johnson tried damage control. “We’re not at war with Greenland. I don’t think anybody’s seriously considering that.”


Except JSOC has the order. The Joint Chiefs are resisting. European troops are deploying. Denmark confirmed that under a 1952 standing order, Danish troops must “immediately take up the fight” if attacked. The government said Danish soldiers would shoot back if Greenland is invaded.


We’re in a situation where U.S. military leadership has concluded a presidential order is illegal, and NATO allies are preparing to defend themselves against the United States.


Trump said January 9th: “We are going to do something on Greenland whether they like it or not. I would like to make a deal, you know, the easy way. But if we don’t do it the easy way, we’re going to do it the hard way.”


Only 8% of Americans support invading Greenland. 73% oppose it. Members of Congress from both parties traveled to Copenhagen to support Denmark. Senator Ruben Gallego introduced a resolution to block Trump from invading. Congress warned that “any member of the military who takes part in the use of force against Greenland without congressional authorization would be carrying out illegal orders.”


The constitutional system is working as designed. The military’s duty is to the Constitution, not the president. When given an order that violates the law and treaty obligations, they’re required to refuse. The Joint Chiefs have done that.


But we’re still in a constitutional crisis. The president is actively trying to order an illegal invasion. He’s threatening economic warfare against allies defending themselves. He’s claiming he doesn’t need international law and might have to choose between seizing Greenland or preserving NATO.


The generals are trying to distract him with other military operations because they think his Greenland plan is “crazy and illegal” and it’s “like dealing with a five-year-old.”


The system is holding. For now. But the fact that it has to hold - that the Joint Chiefs are actively refusing presidential orders and trying to redirect him toward different wars - tells you everything about where we are.



11 comments:

  1. When the first troops go in, will Barron Trump be leading them?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Emma, nice to see you here again. The people who start wars very rarely send their children to fight them. The Trumps have a family tradition of never serving in their country’s military.

      Delete
  2. What we needed to know was evident when he initiated an insurrection on J6 2021. We elected the SOB again anyway. Amerika is an ignorant AND stupid nation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I’m not a conspiracist, but sometimes I think there were malevolent forces behind Trump’s winning a second term in office.

      Delete
    2. Shaw,
      Nothing BUT malevolent forces were behind their Criminal President Trump, especially in 2024.
      Putin, Netanyahu, AIPAC, Musk, Thiel, the Supreme Traitors, the Heritage Foundation, FOX, OAN, Newsmax. and the entire Republicanazi Party.
      We may never know the extent of their tampering with our elections, but we can count on it every time.

      Delete
    3. A great deal of money combined with millions of willfully uninformed people clinging to their delusions and the white privilege they cherish. No conspiracy, simply ignorance combined with with their conditioned reified beliefs. Trump played to exactly that and MAGA was born. Cults grow through ignorance and fear. Trump manipulated both to his personal benefit and the downfall of democracy and our republic.

      Delete
  3. I read somewhere that it is all Biden's fault (!)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sounds like we'll soon have some new Joint Chiefs...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow. A team of little Hegseths. Incompetent bravado their specialty?

      Delete
  5. Shaw? Oh, I'm certain interests outside of the USA had many fingers in the 2024 election. But nothing that our current slate of alphabet organizations would consider investigating. Even if they'd started DOGE came in and wiped it all away.

    I read the last statement that the Joint Chiefs are trying to distract Trump with other wars. All I can visualize are these overstuffed military individuals waving wars like a rattle or toy to distract a fractious toddler. OK, now that I wrote it out it's not funny at all but down right scary! Also, it won't work. How do I know? Has anyone been able to switch a toddler's mind from the topic of anything they've become fixated on? Maybe with a binky and a time out but who is putting our president in a time out? LOL, yeah, no one.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't know who Rachel Hurley is our what her credentials are. Did any of what she alleges actually happen? Who knows. People out there, average citizens, if they write or report "breaking news" have some responsibility to provide the back up, receipts as we've called them here, so people can judge the accuracy of what they are saying.

    So I'm gonna deal with a few things we know have happened.

    Yesterday, President Trump exposed himself bald faced liar, stupid or both. In a statement on NATO, President Trump stated he did not believe when the chips were down that Europe would come to the aid of the United States.

    A sitting US President does not "believe" NATO would be there if we were attacked. Take a minute and let that sink in.

    Hmmm... let's look at a few facts, from NATO itself...

    "On 11 September 2001, the North Atlantic Council issued a statement condemning the attacks and expressing solidarity with the United States. On the evening of 12 September 2001, less than 24 hours after the attacks, Allies met in the North Atlantic Council. The Council agreed 'that if it is determined that this attack was directed from abroad against the United States, it shall be regarded as an action covered by Article 5 of the Washington Treaty'. NATO Secretary General Lord Robertson subsequently informed the Secretary-General of the United Nations of the Alliance’s decision.

    On 2 October 2001, once the Council had been briefed on the results of investigations into the 9/11 attacks, it determined that they were effectively regarded as an action covered by Article 5."

    After this, NATO, standing by the United States participated in and supported through various roles including intelligence, coordination, and armed conflict, etc, joined the US for the wars against Afghanistan and Iraq.

    None of this is opinion. It's fact. When the US chips were down after 9/11, Europe was there in the only time Article 5 of the NATO charter had been invoked.

    So a US President believing something different than what the facts show, should alarm all of us. Just like a president who disagrees with all the evidence, court cases and facts on the election of 2020 should alarm all of us.

    President Trump is a self concerned, narcissistic genius. But when it comes to what's good for the US, the world and by extension, the "common good" and "general welfare" of the United States, he's an idiot.

    ReplyDelete