AI Overview +1 CNN's reporting is based on multiple, anonymous sources familiar with the matter who spoke to the network.The sources indicated the investigation was opened by Andrew S. Boutros, a U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Illinois. The probe is examining whether E. Jean Carroll committed perjury during her civil lawsuits against the President by stating in a 2022 deposition that she received no outside funding for her case, even though it was later revealed billionaire Reid Hoffman partially funded her legal fees.
At the time, Newsomreported that in his post, he believed what CNN reported. I still can’t find where CNN got the information that an investigation was being opened.
TO JOE CONSERVATIVE: When I opened "Comment Moderation" this morning, I found 5 more messages from you. I do not wish this forum to be turned into a platform for your paranoia:
"Awaiting moderation Joe Conservative commented on "CORRUPTION IN PLAIN SIGHT" 10 hours ago I copied it onto my blog (Ad free) in case you're still not willing to experience the harassment Conservatives have to wade through every day.
Awaiting moderation Joe Conservative commented on "CORRUPTION IN PLAIN SIGHT" 10 hours ago Did it scare you away? Then the deep state's harrasment of conservative websites is working (part of their $billions battle against MALINFO online). There is no virus. These are just the malicious MacAfee ads that the deep state buys to harass conservatives with. Don't worry, any virus' you get will be the ones they plant to track conservatives. It tells me I have 18 of them."
Here's how one AI App explains the way politicians use and define "fake news".
The Political View: "Fake news" means biased, unfair, or critical coverage. The Journalism View: "Fake news" means factually incorrect or deliberately fabricated information.
When politicians apply this label to accurate stories, they are operating under a specific, self-serving framework:
Partisan Bias: They define it as information produced by media outlets they claim are working for their political opponents. Negative Framing: They apply the label to stories that focus exclusively on their failures while ignoring their successes. Intent to Harm: They view the coverage not as a public service, but as a deliberate attempt by the press to damage their reputation.
Politicians across the globe use this tactic to manage their public image and protect their political power:
Deflecting Scrutiny: Labeling a factual investigation as "fake news" diverts attention from the scandal to the news organization [1]. Eroding Media Trust: By constantly calling regular reporting fake, leaders make the public doubt all journalism, including accurate reports [1]. Creating Partisan Division: It rallies supporters to ignore critical facts by framing the media as a biased political opponent [1].
My link proved that I applied the term "fake news" according to the Journalism View. It provided a direct refutation of the first charge in Newsome's post.... proving that Newsome's intent was to harm and to create political division.
Actually Joe, your link was useless. I went to your site. It provided no "objective definition" of what "fake news" is. It may an example of a news network being duped and/or making a mistake, but most Americans are smart enough and generous enough to understand that if and when the network owns up.
I'll ask again, Can you provide an objective definition explaining what "fake news" is?
Because if you can't, you place yourself smack in the center of "kayfabe" ring, part of the spectacle, but not a participant in anything "really real".
Corruption News Flash... WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump purchased stock in the company that will receive a fortune in publicity thanks to his decision to promote an Ultimate Fighting Championship event on the White House South Lawn next month.
Trump purchased between $15,001 and $50,000 of stock of TKO Group Holdings, the parent company of UFC, on March 25, according to a review of his May 12 financial disclosure filing.
I'm sure this has nothing to do with the fact that on National Park Service grounds, the US White House, we, the ppl of the US are being forced to host a UFC event that will deliver millions of unpaid for advertising to the company in which our POTUS just invested.
Not even the appearance of corruption here. Not at all. Because it's all in the open.
The apparent love of AI is already becoming evident. As the intellectual elite line up to spur it on. Without so much as a serious thought as to the potentially egregious negative effects it will have on humankind.
Well Les... I can see both sides. It DOES work on a lot of levels. It's cost efficient, smart and when used properly, can really be something good. But, I'm sure when used for evil purposes, it can be something bad.
So what do we do with the proverbial two edged sword?
The Great American Crime Jubilee
ReplyDeleteBrought to you by America's Premier Crime Family.
The trump Crime Syndicate
Fake News.
ReplyDeleteProve it! Otherwise your silly “fake news “is nothing but repeating what the convicted felon in chief says. At least you should try to be original.
DeleteYour source, Gabbin' Gavin, is as kayfabe as the Orange Man. He does make a good "Face" to Don's "Heel"...
Delete-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew... Can you provide an objective definition explaining what "fake news" is?
DeleteNo "it's kayfabe", no videos, no links, no AI... just a real explanation or definition from you. Personally.
I posted a link to the DEFINITIVE proof, Dave. Shaw "moderated" it out. Who am I to question her judgement?
DeleteWhen I tried the link, it warned me about a possible virus. I trued it twice, and the didn’t publish it. Send it again.
DeleteAI Overview +1 CNN's reporting is based on multiple, anonymous sources familiar with the matter who spoke to the network.The sources indicated the investigation was opened by Andrew S. Boutros, a U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Illinois. The probe is examining whether E. Jean Carroll committed perjury during her civil lawsuits against the President by stating in a 2022 deposition that she received no outside funding for her case, even though it was later revealed billionaire Reid Hoffman partially funded her legal fees.
DeleteAt the time, Newsomreported that in his post, he believed what CNN reported. I still can’t find where CNN got the information that an investigation was being opened.
When I worked at NASA, they used to directly block most Conservative websites. But hey, you could reach ALL of the porn sites.
DeleteTO JOE CONSERVATIVE: When I opened "Comment Moderation" this morning, I found 5 more messages from you. I do not wish this forum to be turned into a platform for your paranoia:
Delete"Awaiting moderation
Joe Conservative commented on "CORRUPTION IN PLAIN SIGHT"
10 hours ago
I copied it onto my blog (Ad free) in case you're still not willing to experience the harassment Conservatives have to wade through every day.
Awaiting moderation
Joe Conservative commented on "CORRUPTION IN PLAIN SIGHT"
10 hours ago
Did it scare you away? Then the deep state's harrasment of conservative websites is working (part of their $billions battle against MALINFO online). There is no virus. These are just the malicious MacAfee ads that the deep state buys to harass conservatives with. Don't worry, any virus' you get will be the ones they plant to track conservatives. It tells me I have 18 of them."
lol! You won't post the link. Message received. truth averted.
DeleteHere's how one AI App explains the way politicians use and define "fake news".
ReplyDeleteThe Political View: "Fake news" means biased, unfair, or critical coverage.
The Journalism View: "Fake news" means factually incorrect or deliberately fabricated information.
When politicians apply this label to accurate stories, they are operating under a specific, self-serving framework:
Partisan Bias: They define it as information produced by media outlets they claim are working for their political opponents.
Negative Framing: They apply the label to stories that focus exclusively on their failures while ignoring their successes.
Intent to Harm: They view the coverage not as a public service, but as a deliberate attempt by the press to damage their reputation.
Politicians across the globe use this tactic to manage their public image and protect their political power:
Deflecting Scrutiny: Labeling a factual investigation as "fake news" diverts attention from the scandal to the news organization [1].
Eroding Media Trust: By constantly calling regular reporting fake, leaders make the public doubt all journalism, including accurate reports [1].
Creating Partisan Division: It rallies supporters to ignore critical facts by framing the media as a biased political opponent [1].
I hope -FJ does better.
My link proved that I applied the term "fake news" according to the Journalism View. It provided a direct refutation of the first charge in Newsome's post.... proving that Newsome's intent was to harm and to create political division.
DeleteThink either he or Shaw will issue a retraction? I wouldn't hold your breath.
DeleteActually Joe, your link was useless. I went to your site. It provided no "objective definition" of what "fake news" is. It may an example of a news network being duped and/or making a mistake, but most Americans are smart enough and generous enough to understand that if and when the network owns up.
DeleteI'll ask again, Can you provide an objective definition explaining what "fake news" is?
Because if you can't, you place yourself smack in the center of "kayfabe" ring, part of the spectacle, but not a participant in anything "really real".
Corruption News Flash... WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump purchased stock in the company that will receive a fortune in publicity thanks to his decision to promote an Ultimate Fighting Championship event on the White House South Lawn next month.
ReplyDeleteTrump purchased between $15,001 and $50,000 of stock of TKO Group Holdings, the parent company of UFC, on March 25, according to a review of his May 12 financial disclosure filing.
I'm sure this has nothing to do with the fact that on National Park Service grounds, the US White House, we, the ppl of the US are being forced to host a UFC event that will deliver millions of unpaid for advertising to the company in which our POTUS just invested.
Not even the appearance of corruption here. Not at all. Because it's all in the open.
The apparent love of AI is already becoming evident. As the intellectual elite line up to spur it on. Without so much as a serious thought as to the potentially egregious negative effects it will have on humankind.
ReplyDeleteWell Les... I can see both sides. It DOES work on a lot of levels. It's cost efficient, smart and when used properly, can really be something good. But, I'm sure when used for evil purposes, it can be something bad.
ReplyDeleteSo what do we do with the proverbial two edged sword?
Put guardrails in place that insure AI is not used for nefarious purposes. And, enforce with stiff financial and or prison time.
ReplyDelete