tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1883838569462983439.post5436305381752244002..comments2024-03-28T15:36:57.866-04:00Comments on Progressive Eruptions: CLIMATE CHANGE DENIERS AND BOILED FROGSShaw Kenawehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08637273000409613497noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1883838569462983439.post-16690544804919571012009-12-23T08:56:45.507-05:002009-12-23T08:56:45.507-05:00Though this debate is a couple of weeks old, I'...Though this debate is a couple of weeks old, I'm late because I just came across this blog today. <br /><br />I had to pipe in; at least you folks are debating, as opposed to Algore's "The debate is over." <br /><br />And yes, the question is how much does man-made junk contribute to climate change? And is climate change really all that bad? So what if we have more CO2? In the<br />10th century, which was much warmer than this century, the Vikings grew grapes in Greenland. When the climate changed, they moved on. <br /><br />My problem with this whole debate is the focus on CO2. It seems we've forgotten it's the other crap that people on this planet are spewing by the millions on tons into our atmosphere. I can handle CO2, but breathing in the other crap ain't too good. <br /><br />Algore's mission is to make money. Our mission should be toward a cleaner planet. <br /><br />Algore can go kiss his own ass.Stevehttp://viewfrommidamerica.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1883838569462983439.post-90387914726065624592009-12-11T13:00:51.309-05:002009-12-11T13:00:51.309-05:00Jim's a 'histrorian'. What his speciai...Jim's a 'histrorian'. What his speciaity is we'll never know.<br /><br />Climate change is a little out of his elemet.Arthurstonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01083956773592540646noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1883838569462983439.post-28963798587844761042009-12-11T11:48:08.563-05:002009-12-11T11:48:08.563-05:00Fire and Ice
by Robert Frost
Some say the world w...Fire and Ice<br />by Robert Frost<br /><br />Some say the world will end in fire,<br />Some say in ice.<br />From what I've tasted of desire<br />I hold with those who favor fire.<br />But if it had to perish twice,<br />I think I know enough of hate<br />To say that for destruction ice<br />Is also great<br />And would suffice.TOMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09538055688006675704noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1883838569462983439.post-568953831800325352009-12-10T19:49:48.473-05:002009-12-10T19:49:48.473-05:00Jim: “What link are you referring to? Mine or ?”
...Jim: “<i>What link are you referring to? Mine or ?</i>”<br /><br />Jim, Jim, Jim, this is getting sooo ridiculous, it hurts. The link was CLEARLY REFERENCED as a “WMO” link, the same link as in the body of the post. Look again. <br /><br />Jim: “<i>So miss prissy …</i>”<br /><br />Ahem, for your information, I happen to be a male octopus. If you were not so tedious and tendentious, you would be hilarious.(O)CT(O)PUShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07589336822561030860noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1883838569462983439.post-74504192511229086572009-12-10T16:05:02.665-05:002009-12-10T16:05:02.665-05:00The frog analogy is apt indeed. Part of the reaso...The frog analogy is apt indeed. Part of the reason that average Joes and Janes are buying this is that they are being bombarded by propaganda by Big Oil and Big Oil as well as their pr people and bought corporate media. These days, corporations also have pr people going to the blogs spreading disinformation too.libhomhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05537213558568338561noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1883838569462983439.post-45265071291723153872009-12-10T15:19:41.860-05:002009-12-10T15:19:41.860-05:00Talk about being over opinionated and hostile. Wha...Talk about being over opinionated and hostile. What happened octopus? You go to bed stupid last night or did you wake up that way this morning? <br /><br />What link are you referring to? Mine or ? So miss prissy, if NOAA uses tainted data and others in the world use that same data it seems to this uneducated frog that the whole data base is tainted. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703939404574567423917025400.html" rel="nofollow">Why don't you follow this link.</a><br /><br />OK, you caught me on the man made comment. Sorry. Sorry that I live and breathe. How it must pain you to know that I contribute to global warming.Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02792653155614547164noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1883838569462983439.post-65435543346716535952009-12-10T13:29:37.008-05:002009-12-10T13:29:37.008-05:00Jim, for a hostile and snarky wisecracker, you are...Jim, for a hostile and snarky wisecracker, you are not very clever. You said:<br /><br />Jim: “<i> I said tainted data. NOAA and the NWS use surface temp stations to record the data in absolutely the most absurd locations.</i>”<br /><br />If you followed the link and read the report, you would have found this:<br /><br />WMO: “<i>The measurement data are reported by participating countries and archived and distributed by the World Data Centre for Greenhouse Gases (WDCGG) at the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA).</i>”<br /><br />Thus, NOAA data represents only a fraction of source data pooled from hundreds of observation sites run by dozens of countries. Furthermore, there is nothing in your background to suggest you are qualified to peer review anything, since your claim of “tainted data” is merely ventriloquism for right wing talking points. Furthermore, you said this:<br /><br />Jim: “<i> I noticed you left out the "man made" part.</i>”<br /><br />It seems you have a reading and comprehension impediment since you did not read this:<br /><br />“<i>It means that more than half of all greenhouse gases (56% of total emissions) have a human origin. Hence, the term “anthropogenic,” meaning “caused by human beings.”</i>”<br /><br />In other words, “man-made.” Jim, you are a poor imitation of a boiled frog: Over-opinionated, under-educated, and just plain stupid.(O)CT(O)PUShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07589336822561030860noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1883838569462983439.post-91624323924290923482009-12-10T12:53:00.860-05:002009-12-10T12:53:00.860-05:00I found this joke by doing a google search. Enjoy....I found this joke by doing a google search. Enjoy.<br /><br /><i><br />When President Obama asked Al Gore if global warming was real Gore replied <br /><br />' Just ask the puddle that used to be Frosty the Snowman".</i> by K B(M), DailyComedy.com<br /><br />I can envision your frog leaping out of the puddle left behind by Frosty! ;-)Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02792653155614547164noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1883838569462983439.post-79581012464957268652009-12-10T12:41:45.458-05:002009-12-10T12:41:45.458-05:00Just because you post graphs based on tainted data...Just because you post graphs based on tainted data does not make for a good argument for "man made" global warming. I noticed you left out the "man made" part.<br /><br />No one disputes global climate change. Of course the climate is changing. It is in continuous change. It's nature. <br /><br />I said tainted data. NOAA and the NWS use surface temp stations to record the data in absolutely the most absurd locations. <a href="http://www.surfacestations.org/" rel="nofollow">Go here to see a website on these stations and their locations.</a>Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02792653155614547164noreply@blogger.com