tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1883838569462983439.post2368014602847989997..comments2024-03-28T13:28:58.171-04:00Comments on Progressive Eruptions: BOYCOTT BEST BUY & TARGET STORESShaw Kenawehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08637273000409613497noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1883838569462983439.post-573970473928411812012-12-07T07:11:12.413-05:002012-12-07T07:11:12.413-05:00morale, the report concludes. SOME OF THE PROBLEMS...morale, the report concludes. SOME OF THE PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED BY THE REPORT Family health services expenditure per capita in London is less than in other inner city areas and the http://buyviagraonlineauviagra-au.com#572 viagra au three Keating sisters, Honora, Lorna and Eileen, and their eighty-year-old mother to buy Plas-yn-Rhiw and its fifty-eight acres in 1939; later they purchased over 300 acres more http://buyviagra100mgcostviagraonline.co.uk#8769 Viagra 100mg cost The Vipasana technique increases our awareness of mind and bodyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1883838569462983439.post-33189543924452432962010-11-03T00:37:06.390-04:002010-11-03T00:37:06.390-04:00I totally agreed with Dmarks that "getting ri...I totally agreed with Dmarks that "getting rid of laws which criminalized the people voicing criticism of those in power"Target Promohttp://www.couponrefund.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1883838569462983439.post-21767208044667523362010-08-24T13:16:30.317-04:002010-08-24T13:16:30.317-04:00Here's why the Target and Best Buy Boycotts ar...Here's why the Target and Best Buy Boycotts are gaining momentum, and not dying off or fading away. The most interesting part, I think is in paragraph 12... Best Buy's published "Code of Business Ethics"... really?<br /><br />http://retailindustry.about.com/b/2010/08/24/best-buy-and-target-risk-losing-759-billion-in-lgbt-consumer-spending-from-gay-rights-boycotts-tgt-bby.htmBJhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07187245411169493268noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1883838569462983439.post-56392920460482514292010-08-08T17:47:35.964-04:002010-08-08T17:47:35.964-04:00"Wrong, they ran into campaign finance laws, ..."Wrong, they ran into campaign finance laws, not into censorship laws ... big difference."<br /><br />Not at all a difference here: these particular campaign finance laws demanded censorship. That's what it is all really about: rigging laws in order to find a way to silence unwanted expression.<br /><br />From Wikipedia: "provisions of the McCain–Feingold Act which prevented the film Hillary: The Movie from being shown on television within 30 days of 2008 Democratic primaries."<br /><br />Banning something being shown on TV? It's hard to see that as anything other than censorship.dmarkshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07269773990064736457noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1883838569462983439.post-50935483225898211482010-08-05T15:44:35.587-04:002010-08-05T15:44:35.587-04:00"Lost sight of is the actual case itself: som..."<i>Lost sight of is the actual case itself: some people decided to criticize Hillary Clinton, and ran into censorship laws.</i>"<br /><br />Wrong, they ran into campaign finance laws, not into censorship laws ... big difference.(O)CT(O)PUShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07589336822561030860noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1883838569462983439.post-59030431400810948372010-08-05T14:32:30.251-04:002010-08-05T14:32:30.251-04:00It did empower people. This is exactly what it did...It did empower people. This is exactly what it did. People, as you may know, organize into unions, interest groups, and other corporations. The First Amendment says nothing to strip away right of free speech for anyone <i>at all</i> with anything to do with these groups.<br /><br />If you don't like what someone says, ignore it. Don't censor it.<br /><br />Lost sight of is the actual case itself: some people decided to criticize Hillary Clinton, and ran into censorship laws.dmarkshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07269773990064736457noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1883838569462983439.post-21536449118798857632010-08-05T09:58:53.859-04:002010-08-05T09:58:53.859-04:00Dmarks - getting rid of laws which criminalized th...<b>Dmarks</b> - <i>getting rid of laws which criminalized the people voicing criticism of those in power</i><br /><br />The decision did no such thing. It didn't empower people. It empowered corporations. In a country where money talks, the people have LOST POWER to corporations that have the money to talk the loudest.<br /><br />In ruling that now considers corporations as legal persons, the currency of REAL PEOPLE has just been devalued ... while the inequality between HAVES and HAVE NOTS has widened further.(O)CT(O)PUShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07589336822561030860noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1883838569462983439.post-86215876984703323582010-08-05T09:39:13.137-04:002010-08-05T09:39:13.137-04:00The ruling in Citizens United restored the heart o...The ruling in Citizens United restored the heart of the First Amendment by getting rid of laws which criminalized the people voicing criticism of those in power. <br /><br />While I disagree with the corporate person part of the ruling, I agree strongly with the anti-censorship part of the ruling.<br /><br />I support the right of the people in these companies to criticized politicians without going to jail for it, just as I support your right to call for a boycott. That's the way to deal with the problem of Target and Best Buy. Not by censoring.dmarkshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07269773990064736457noreply@blogger.com