Paul Revere by Cyrus Dallin, North End, Boston

~~~

General John Kelly: "He said that, in his opinion, Mr. Trump met the definition of a fascist, would govern like a dictator if allowed, and had no understanding of the Constitution or the concept of rule of law."

Friday, March 29, 2013

The Grand Old Jurassic Party


UPDATE BELOW

Today we take a look at what's happening, or has happened, in GOJP land on economic and social issues:   


Walker Wrecks Wisconsin as State Plunges to 44th in Private Sector Job Growth 

"Remember when Scott Walker promised 250,000 additional private sector jobs if only the voters would elect him Governor of Wisconsin? 

Well, they did, but he hasn’t delivered. 

Wisconsin has fallen again, according to a U.S. Bureau of Labor statistics report. They are now at 44 out of 50 states for private sector job growth from September 2011 to September 2012."

[skip]

"...Forbes named Wisconsin one of the worst states for business, somehow claiming that because they weren’t a “right-to-work” state they are flailing, when in reality, Walker’s union busting policies have had plenty of time to attract business, per the Right wing claim. But they haven’t."



In 1995, Texas lawmakers insisted on imposing "abstinence only" as the only standard for sex education in schools across the state:    

"The results have been devastating. 


In 1992, Texas had the ninth-highest teen pregnancy rate in the country. 

By 2008, it had jumped to third-highest. In other categories, the statistics are just as staggering today: 

Texas is ahead of the national average in teen births, repeat teen births and high schoolers who have had sex. 

The state lags behind the national average in high schoolers who have used a condom or birth control pills for their last sexual encounter. State taxpayers are left with a $1 billion annual bill for teen births. That’s just the beginning. 

Babies born to mothers ages 15 to 17 have poorer health, lower cognitive development, do worse in school and have higher incarceration rates. No wonder that, in a poll of bipartisan voters last month, 84 percent of Texans said they favored a comprehensive program that includes teaching abstinence but that also provides scientific-based information. 

That approach, abstinence-plus, has been previously endorsed by this newspaper. Rather than embracing the will of the public, state lawmakers, led by Sen. Ken Paxton, R-McKinney, are using sex education to push an anti-abortion agenda that would lead to state intervention in local decision-making."





Food Stamp Use is Highest in Red States: The Truth Republicans Do Not Want You to Know


"Economists say that providing food stamps might be the most stimulative action the government can take. Tax cuts for the wealthy ranks around 12th. I'm not against tax cuts for the wealthy out of any disdain for the wealthy. 

[skip]

So, the question is, do Republican approaches work? Who do they work for? Do they work long term? 

[skip]

Charts of food stamp usage show that while a few Democrat-led states have high food stamp usage; food stamp usage is highest consistently across Republican states. 

What does that say about the Republican approach...the top down, trickle down theory of economics fails the poor. Under conditions where the poor were helped, one would expect that there would be less reliance on food stamps. People would receive short-term support, a little assistance getting on their feet, maybe some job training, or some assistance paying for community college and would be on their way. 

If the poor are uplifted even just slightly then they become tax payers rather than living off food stamps. 

Republicans are angry about food stamp usage because they have failed to uplift the poor in their states. The top down, trickle down, economic approach has broken social mobility in Republican led states. Republicans are angry because their failed economic approach leaves them with fewer tax payers and more people on welfare." 



Here is an astute analysis:


The Grand Old Jurassic Party
STEVE ERICKSON FEBRUARY 14, 2013

With its focus on ideological purity, the Republican species is on the brink of extinction.



"The Republican Party is a presidential election away from extinction. If it can’t win the 2016 contest, and unless it has bolstered its congressional presence beyond the benefits of gerrymandered redistricting—which is to say not only retaking the Senate but polling more votes than the opposition nationally—the party will die. 

It will die not for reasons of “branding” or marketing or electoral cosmetics but because the party is at odds with the inevitable American trajectory in the direction of liberty, and with its own nature; paradoxically the party of Abraham Lincoln, which once saved the Union and which gives such passionate lip service to constitutionality, has come to embody the values of the Confederacy in its hostility to constitutional federalism and the civil bonds that the founding document codifies. 

The Republican Party will vanish not because of what its says but because of what it believes, not because of how it presents itself but because of who it is when it thinks no one is looking."


And lastly, here's another reason why minorities don't like them. (Remember how the GOJP has claimed it must attract Latinos and make them feel welcome in their party?)   Now read below how a member of the House of Representatives, without a hint of embarrassment, refers to farm workers.  After all, where he comes from, this is probably an acceptable term for Latinos:


"Rep. Don Young (R-AK) used an ethnic slur to describe Mexican farm workers in an interview with a local station KRBD on Thursday. "My father had a ranch; we used to have 50-60 wetbacks to pick tomatoes,” he said while discussing economic trends of the last few decades. “It takes two people to pick the same tomatoes now. It’s all done by machine.” Young's "wetback" remark comes as the GOP is engaged in a large scale effort to win over Latino voters, who have been alienated by party members' anti-immigration rhetoric and policies in recent years."


UPDATE:
Note to the GOJP:  If you want to be seen as a more inclusive party, it's best that you don't call gay people "filthy."  


Geeeez!

Latinos are "wetbacks," gay people are "filthy," women who wish to have their health insurance include contraception coverage are "sluts," and African-Americans stay with the Democratic Party because they're too stupid to know any better?

And this Michigan Republican says gays are responsible for half the murders in cities!  Where do they get these idiots?  I mean, does the GOJP send out flyers asking for the craziest, dumbest people to join them and become leaders?  It certainly seems so.

Whew!  And they wonder why minorities don't go near this party.

Dumb is too kind a word. 

22 comments:

Anonymous said...

It hasn't worked for decades. The question is why have Americans voted for Republicans in the face (fact) of their failed policies?
If tax cuts created jobs, we should be swimming in jobs. If "trickle down" worked, we should all be rich, or at least middle class. They claim, "leave it to the private sector." I guess that's why corporations are cash rich, the stock market is at record high, corporate profits are at record highs, but we have 15 million unemployed and half of Americans are so poor they don't even qualify to pay federal taxes.

Jerry Critter said...

That's right anon. High profits, high business savings, high stock markets do not creat jobs. Demand creates jobs. And money in the workers hands creates demand.

okjimm said...

Yeah..Wisconsin...we are broke...he has done nothing....but somehow found $8mm to give out as bonuses.


http://www.thenorthwestern.com/viewart/20130323/OSH0101/303230300/

billy pilgrim said...

demand creates jobs in china and india.

your leaders need to admit that free trade isn't working and impose tariffs on select imports.

too bad about iginla.

Les Carpenter said...

The rEpublican party lost it's principles about the time Goldwater and Buckley were but a memory.

Dave Miller said...

Speaking of Jurassic...

A sitting Congressman uses the term "Wetback" and means no respect?

I guess i should be glad he was from California originally and not Alabama or he might have used another term and meant no disrespect...

http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/politics/2013/03/29/rep-don-young-in-hot-water-for-wetback-comment/

At least we have finally found out how far a GOP Congressman can go before receiving a rebuke from the leadership...

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/03/29/rep-young-says-meant-no-disrespect-by-using-term-wetbacks/

Hey GOP, how's that Latino outreach going? Between this and Sen McCain basically saying stuff it when asked about the term illegal, I am sure you'll be rolling in support from this community in the next elections...

Incredible...

Shaw Kenawe said...


Dave,


I don't mean any disrespect when I call US Rep. Don Young an incorrigible clodpole.

RN,

Right now, the GOJP is in thrall to the crazies--the ones who claim FAUX NOOZ has gone all liberal.

billy,

Iginla would have been great. Broonz shouldn't have lost him. However, we still our little "Ball of Hate."

okjimm, how much longer does he have to serve as governor?

JC,

Correct. But too many GOJPers believe cutting rich people's taxes creates jobs.

Anon,

Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results is the definition of idiocy. But no one in the GOJP got the message.

Les Carpenter said...

Having worked my a** off from 12 until 16 on the farms of the upper Pacific Northwest as an adolescent count me as a wetback. Working hard in the sun made us all wetbacks.

I know, just opened myself up for a progressive lashing.

The reality is we are all human, we all bleed, we all sweat, we all love, and unfortunatelty occasionally we hate.

Cultural differences should not define our humanity.

rEpublicans seem slow to learn or understand this today. There was a time dEmocrats suffered from the same malady.

Les Carpenter said...

I could have sworn I left a comment on the heals of Daves comment. Oh well, perhaps its just age catching up.

Shaw Kenawe said...

RN,

The term "wetback" is a derogatory term used to denigrate Mexicans and Mexican-Americans. It's like calling Chinese people "chinks," or Italians "wops" and "guineas." In the past those terms were used to insult and diminish a cultural group.

When a group of people find those terms insulting, I think it's good practice not to use them when referring to them. And it is especially shocking to hear a US Representative refer to a group of people as wetbacks. Didn't he get the memo where it said calling people by insulting names is, well, rude?

I'm sure you worked hard, but I'm also sure no one would mistake you for a Mexican or a Mexican-American, so having someone label you that wouldn't be as much of an insult.

I don't know what Rep. Young was thinking. Actually, he wasn't "thinking."

Jerry Critter said...

The term "wetback" does not refer to someone who works hard and sweats, thus getting a sweaty, wet back. It is a derogatory term applied to primarily Mexicans who are presumed to have illegally entered the US by swimming across the Rio Grande river thus getting a wet back.

Les Carpenter said...

Actually Shaw and Jerry I anticipated you would miss the larger point in my statement.

No loss at all, at least from my perspective because I had an open conversation with a Mexican waitress this afternoon while having lunch at the Portuguese restaurant Mrs. Rational Nation and I frequent.

Corina shared her feelings (she is first generation Mexican American) and understood the same point I made here quite well. She actually understands by far better than any American progressive seems capable of.

But then again tolerance and understanding is not anything progressives do any better than conservatives.

For them both it is always... MY WAY OR TE HIGHWAY.

Les Carpenter said...

Damn I must be getting old. I could have sworn I responded to yours and Jerry's last comments. Oh well, such is the ravages of time.

Always On Watch said...

About the update to the body of the blog post....

People can believe what they wish. But as I read certain statements from members of the GOP, my mind reels. This information did stun me: Michigan Republican says gays are responsible for half the murders in cities.

Look. I've seen the Left make baseless claims. And I'm enough of a realist to know that the Right also makes baseless claims.

I have to wonder if the Michigan Republican were not, as a child, sexually assaulted. To tell you the truth, all of the "homophobes" whom I personally know WERE indeed sexually assaulted.

Actually, I don't know many homophobes; I'm just speaking from personal observation.

I do know many on the religious right who define homosexuality and extra-marital hetero-sex as sins. A Jurassic idea? I guess so, but it is their conviction, nevertheless.

BTW, I am not, nor have I even been, a member of the GOP. I've always been registered as an Independent. In my voting life, I have cast ballots all along the political spectrum. So, I don't "have a dog in this race."

Shaw Kenawe said...

AOW: "I do know many on the religious right who define homosexuality and extra-marital hetero-sex as sins. A Jurassic idea? I guess so, but it is their conviction, nevertheless."

I understand this. Members of my family are deeply religious. People who hold these beliefs are perfectly within their rights.

The objections come about when public policy is being made, and when deeply religious folks try to insert their beliefs into public policy.

I have the old-fashioned idea that the law should be neutral in these matters. That is, where equal protection under the law is concerned.

Always On Watch said...

Shaw,
People who hold these beliefs are perfectly within their rights.

The objections come about when public policy is being made, and when deeply religious folks try to insert their beliefs into public policy.


You will likely note that I have never disputed the above.

In some ways, I was brought up the Mennonite way (via the Church of the Brethren). As my father used to say, "I have enough to do in taking care of my own soul. Your soul is YOUR business."

I do wonder about a slippery slope, of course. Maybe because I'm reading yet again Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451? I will be posting a review of that novel on April 8.

Jerry Critter said...

So RN, why don't you explain your "larger point" since I am unable to,understand it.

Les Carpenter said...

The larger point my friend is that for those that bear no bias driven by bigotry or racism, having been in the situation described, understand the common humanity we all share.

My grandfather, a straw boss in the apple fields of Washington State where many Mexicans were employed spoke of Mexicans with nothing but respect. He had many Mexican friends.

My grandfather taught by example, as did my father. Amazing how conservative independents and conservative democrats actually get it, huh Jerry? You know what I'm talking about. I mean as opposed to the belief some progressives subscribe to that ONLY progressives get it.

Jerry Critter said...

Did your grandfather call them wetbacks? I suspect that he had more respect for them than to do that.

Les Carpenter said...

Very good guess Jerry.

Jerry Critter said...

See, that's the problem with the term. At best, it is a term of disrespect. At worst, it is a racial slur.

Silverfiddle said...

As someone who has spend most of his adult life in the Southwest, I'd like to inject a little reality into the "wetback" discussion.

It is a commonly-used term in the Southwest, just as much by Hispanics as by Anglos.

People here consider it a slur when applied to an entire group, but is used as a descriptive for people who cross illegally in order to work.

Still, I would not use the term, since it is offensive.

I am not defending its use, just letting everyone here know that Hispanics and Anglos use the term routinely, especially in areas where farming is prevalent.