The Liar-in-Chief, currently disgracing the Oval Office, commented on Beto O'Rourke's entry today into the Democratic presidential race.
Liar-in-Chief said he'd never seen such hand motions and didn't know if Beto was crazy or what.
Hand motions?
Did President Dotard mean like this?:
Normal Americans were repulsed to see a grown man mock a disabled person. But President Dotard's cultists loved every minute of his nasty performance. They're as heartless and hateful as he is.
BTW, good luck to Beto. He's young, energetic, and smart and even with his faults is 10 times the man Trump never was and never will be.
The comparison between young, energetic, smart, coherent and charismatic Beto and the obese, inarticulate, mendacious con man will be striking.
It is no wonder that President Individual No. 1 was so quick to trash the exciting O'Rourke. Individual No. 1 knows that people will take a long hard look at the huge differences between the two men and that will not be favorable for Trump.
Go Beto!
7 comments:
Did you see this re the Manafort sentencing?
For the record, here's what the judges have said:
“The ‘no collusion’ refrain that runs through the entire defense memorandum is unrelated to matters at hand,” [Judge Amy Berman]Jackson said. “The ‘no collusion’ mantra is simply a non-sequitur.”
“The ‘no collusion’ mantra is also not accurate because the investigation is still ongoing,” she added.
Jackson’s comments were similar to what Judge T.S. Ellis III said about collusion earlier this month, when he sentenced Manafort to 47 months in prison for tax and bank fraud charges that were also brought by special counsel Robert Mueller.
Ellis pointed out that Manafort was “not before the court for anything having to do with colluding with the Russian government.” His comments didn’t rule out that collusion happened, nor did it rule out that the Trump campaign may have been been involved in it.
Personally I'm not getting too excited about ANYONE at this early stage. The now crowded field of 15 (sure to expand) will be pruned by rating polls. When it's down to the final 3 remaining THEN I'll take an interest and decide which candidate I think has the greatest PROBABILITY of defeating the FAKE HUMAN tRump.
Even if I am not terribly impressed with the person who wins the democratic party nomination I intend to vote for them. tRump MUST BE DEFEATED!
It's an insult to compare Democrats running for president to Trump. You do your candidates a disservice.
Anonymous, the actual point IS to compare Trump to everyone who is far above and away better than he is. Americans have to be reminded what they did to themselves when they put this abomination into office. When Trump is compared to Beto, he looks like a pile of rotten refuse.
All you do is lower the standards of every Democrat in the race comparing them to the low life Trump.
Anon, I disagree.
There is no way that my comparisons on this blog "lowers" the "standards" of Democratic candidates who may run against Trump. Their standards cannot be lowered simply by comparing them with Trump. I will continue to point out to those who care about our democracy that Trump is an inferior human being and a failure at politics.
I will continue to do this.
We hope you do continue Shaw, you help solidify any of Trumps base who would stop by.
Post a Comment