Paul Revere by Cyrus Dallin, North End, Boston

Tuesday, August 26, 2025

MAKE IT MAKE SENSE.

 

HEATHER COX RICHARDSON:


Calling Chicago, Illinois, a “a disaster” and “a killing field,” Trump referred to Illinois governor J.B. Pritzker as “a slob.” Trump complained that Pritzker had said Trump was infringing on American freedom and called Trump a dictator. Trump went on: “A lot of people are saying maybe we like a dictator. I don't like a dictator. I'm not a dictator. I'm a man with great common sense and a smart person. And when I see what's happening to our cities, and then you send in troops instead of being praised, they're saying you're trying to take over the Republic. These people are sick.”
This afternoon, standing flanked by leaders from business, law enforcement, faith communities, education, local communities, and politics at the Chicago waterfront near the Trump Tower there, Governor Pritzker responded to the news that Trump is planning to send troops to Chicago.
He began by saying: “I want to speak plainly about the moment that we are in and the actual crisis, not the manufactured one, that we are facing in the city and as a state and as a country. If it sounds to you like I am alarmist, that is because I am ringing an alarm, one that I hope every person listening will heed, both here in Illinois and across the country.”
He acknowledged that “[o]ver the weekend, we learned from the media that Donald Trump has been planning for quite a while now to deploy armed military personnel to the streets of Chicago. This is exactly the type of overreach that our country's founders warned against. And it’s the reason that they established a federal system with a separation of powers built on checks and balances. What President Trump is doing is unprecedented and unwarranted. It is illegal, it is unconstitutional. It is un-American.”
Pritzker noted that neither his office nor that of Chicago’s mayor had received any communications from the White House. “We found out what Donald Trump was planning the same way that all of you did. We read a story in the Washington Post. If this was really about fighting crime and making the streets safe, what possible justification could the White House have for planning such an exceptional action without any conversations or consultations with the governor, the mayor or the police?”
“Let me answer that question,” he said. "This is not about fighting crime. This is about Donald Trump searching for any justification to deploy the military in a blue city in a blue state to try and intimidate his political rivals. This is about the president of the United States and his complicit lackey Stephen Miller searching for ways to lay the groundwork to circumvent our democracy, militarize our cities, and end elections. There is no emergency in Chicago that calls for armed military intervention. There is no insurrection.”
Pritzker noted that every major American city deals with crime, but that the rate of violent crime is actually higher in Republican-dominated states and cities than in those run by Democrats. Illinois, he said, had “hired more police and given them more funding. We banned assault weapons, ghost guns, bump stocks, and high-capacity magazines” and “invested historic amounts into community violence intervention programs.” Those actions have cut violent crime down dramatically. Pritzker pointed out that “thirteen of the top twenty cities in homicide rates have Republican governors. None of these cities is Chicago. Eight of the top ten states with the highest homicide rates are led by Republicans. None of those states is Illinois.”
If Trump were serious about combatting crime, Pritzker asked, why did he, along with congressional Republicans, cut more than $800 million in public safety and crime prevention grants? “Trump,” Pritzker said, “is defunding the police.”

7 comments:

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

Chicago shootings: At least 34 shot, 5 fatally, in weekend gun violence across city, police say

In DC.... 0

Les Carpenter said...

When and if America wakes up, and it's a real big if, the work that will be required to reverse the FOTUS's destruction will be monumental.

Shaw Kenawe said...

It appears from your comment that you favor a police state for fighting crime. Mussolini did too: "Benito Mussolini used a combination of police, paramilitary forces, and military methods to violently suppress organized crime, particularly the Sicilian Mafia. While he is credited with significantly weakening the Mafia during his rule, his methods were brutal and repressive."

Do you remember how that turned out for Moussolini? I do.


Hitler used his own special forces, the SS & the Gestapo, to enforce his regime's will and eliminate political opponents, dissidents, and "undesirable" people.

The German military was a powerful and traditional institution that Hitler courted and later controlled, but he understood it was not a reliable instrument for internal political terror. For this, he created and empowered new forces that were loyal exclusively to him and the Nazi Party (like ICE).

The way to fight crime is to give more resources to the local police, not cut that funding, as the Trump administration did, so that they could federalize states' national guard and occupy blue states as nothing more than a show of thuggish power by a convicted criminal mob boss!


"Recent reporting confirms that the Trump administration in 2025 did cut hundreds of Department of Justice (DOJ) grants that provided federal funding for state and local law enforcement. These cuts, valued at approximately $500 million, affected programs for policing, violence prevention, victim services, and mental health support."

You are on the wrong side of history. As usual. Nothing! Not even statistics that prove only a temporary drop in crime, justifies what the criminal Trump is doing in DC, and what he plans to do in ONLY blue cities.

Trump is on the wrong side of history. He needs to look at what happened to Moussolini and Hitler -- look at what history does to tyrants.

Les Carpenter said...

He does favor a police state. One blessed by his mythological god.

Shaw Kenawe said...

He obviously doesn’t read history.

Dave Miller said...

Maybe if President Trump had deployed the National Guard that was standing by prior to January 6, we would not have had such a tourist visit/insurrection/riot at the Capitol that day.

-FJ, what you fail to realize or accept, is that a president does not have the authority to on a whim, send troops into our cities.

Years ago I am sure, you would have agreed, but your chaos loving self now, chooses differently.

I wonder why?

Shaw Kenawe said...

What does Trump or -FJ think will happen when the NG leaves DC? Or does Trump and -FJ think the NG will be in DC permanently? Really? Does -FJ actually believe there will be no crime ever again once the NG leave any city?

What's the plan?