A massive gold statue of a living political figure, fist raised in triumph, standing like some self-anointed redeemer in a manicured temple of wealth, while followers insist it’s merely about “freedom” and “courage,” would be laughable if it weren’t so psychologically telling. Democracies do not traditionally build golden effigies to leaders as objects of emotional devotion. Authoritarian movements do. Fragile movements built on grievance, mythmaking, and the desperate need for a strongman savior do.
And let’s be honest about the theology here. When a movement wraps one man in endless symbols of infallibility, victimhood, masculine strength, persecution, and divine destiny, while defending every lie, every indictment, every cruelty, every incoherent outburst as somehow evidence of his greatness, we’ve moved well past political support and into something far closer to secular worship.
The irony, of course, is impossible to miss. Many of the same people who loudly proclaim biblical values seem entirely untroubled by the optics of literal golden iconography dedicated to their chosen champion. If your political identity requires monuments, ritual praise, loyalty tests, and a narrative in which your leader alone can save the nation, that’s not civic engagement. That’s emotional dependency dressed in red, white, and blue merchandising.
What does it say about a movement that sees this and feels pride rather than discomfort? Perhaps that politics has ceased to be about governance at all. For some, it has become theater. Myth. Tribal identity. A substitute religion where policy barely matters, contradiction is irrelevant, and devotion itself becomes the point.
Because when a politician becomes less a public servant and more a golden symbol of collective longing, resentment, and grievance, history tends to have an unkind word for that phenomenon." —Michael Jochum, Not Just a Drummer: Reflections on Art, Politics, Dogs, and the Human Condition.
**********************
Dictators, particularly in the Soviet Union and Central Asia, have long used giant, often golden, statues of themselves to project power, enforce a cult of personality, and maintain a presence after death.
5 comments:
I seem to remember us toppling one of those types of things back in the day.
Today?
Not so much. Not so much we even have people praying to and blessing these modern day golden calf statues.
Another symptom of The Decline of the American Empire.
We have devolved from a real democratic republic to one in name only.
In the present time we are but an authoritarian klepticracy who's interests are to insure the continued efforts to further enrich the interests of the i%'s and red oligarchs of Amerika.
And MAGAs continue to blindly cheer the suffering of working Americans as they continue to worship their malignant narcissist Anti-Christ.
It's just evidence that America's "gilded age" is making a comeback. The days of the "luxury values" of elites being expressed through a "liberal education" and not a gold Rolex are finally over. The hypocrisy simply became too obviously ridiculous... (ie trans men competing in women's sports).
Trump bought Mar-a-Lago just to p*ss off the Wasps that wouldn't let him join their Bath & Tennis Club... and became President after the DC elite made fun of him at the WHCD under Obama...
Upon purchasing Mar-a-Lago in the 1990s, Donald Trump was blackballed by the elite, historically exclusive Bath and Tennis Club in Palm Beach, leading to a long-standing feud and rivalry. Trump responded by creating an inclusive alternative at Mar-a-Lago, attacking the established, predominantly white/WASP, and allegedly anti-semitic, clubs of Palm Beach.
The Blackballing: When Trump tried to join the Bath and Tennis Club, he was rejected by the established Palm Beach high society, described as a battle of "nouveau riche" vs. old money.The Feud: Trump aimed to compete with the "posh" and "snobbish" Bath and Tennis Club, calling its members "those who inherited" and calling his own club, Mar-a-Lago, for "the doers".
Discrimination Allegations: Trump sued the town of Palm Beach for $100 million in 1997, arguing it was enforcing unfair restrictions on Mar-a-Lago because he allowed Jewish and African American members, a move seen as a strike against the exclusionary practices of clubs like the Bath and Tennis.
Retaliation: Trump often highlighted his club's inclusivity as a direct challenge to the "steely racism" and antisemitism he claimed existed in the older, elite, nearby clubs.
Ongoing Tension: Even in later years, Trump continued to refer to the exclusionary nature of such clubs, stating he wouldn't join them because they didn't take Black or Jewish members.
The tension highlighted the shift in Palm Beach's social scene, with Mar-a-Lago attracting members who were previously shunned by the traditional, older clubs.
Trump practices "inclusivity?" LOL! His Mar-a-Largo club is inclusive so long as you give him the $250 fee to be part of it! So he opened his club to Black and Jewish members who could pay the exorbitant fees to belong! How inclusive of him! LOL! ASAIK, Trump wouldn't turn away even a green ET if it were willing to pay him what he asked for.
"In 1973, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) sued Donald Trump, his father Fred Trump, and Trump Management for systemic racial discrimination against Black people seeking to rent apartments. Government investigators used "testers"—one Black and one white applicant with similar qualifications—who found that Black applicants were frequently told no apartments were available, while white applicants were offered units in the same buildings.'
It's not a matter of discrimination on the color of one's skin or what one's religion is in his inclusion of Blacks and Jews at his club. For Trump, the color of money will always win out, even over his innate racism.
That should be $250 THOUSAND above that WAS the fee to join Mar-a-Largo.
HOWEVER, that's not correct:
"As of May 2026, the initiation fee to join the exclusive Mar-a-Lago Club is $1 million. This fee increased significantly from $700,000 in late 2024, continuing a sharp upward trend from $200,000 in 2017. Members also pay roughly $20,000 in annual dues and a $2,000 minimum for dining."
You actually think Trump is being altruistic allowing Blacks and Jews to join his club for $1 million fee and other add-ons?
Alrighty, then!
Post a Comment