Paul Revere by Cyrus Dallin, North End, Boston

~~~

General John Kelly: "He said that, in his opinion, Mr. Trump met the definition of a fascist, would govern like a dictator if allowed, and had no understanding of the Constitution or the concept of rule of law."

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

OBAMA'S SPEECH, March 18, 2008


By John Nichols, The Nation:
Barack Obama could have responded to the controversy that has been ginned up with regard to comments made by his former pastor with a safe and predictable speech. The politically "smart" strategy -- counseled by some Obama allies -- would have been to have the Democratic presidential contender focus on concerns about the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Jr.'s critique of U.S. foreign policy and then distance himself from any offending sentiments.
But Obama did not do the politically "smart" thing.
He did the right thing. And that is why his campaign will weather this storm.
The Illinois senator recognized that the media-driven dialogue about sermons delivered by Wright had little to do with the content of the pastor's words and everything to do with the color of the pastor's -- and the candidate's -- skin.
So Obama seized the opportunity to open up a dialogue about the role of race in America, turning a political challenge into what the late Paul Wellstone referred to as "a teaching moment."

At the most basic level, Obama did what the media has failed to do. He presented Wright and Wright's comments on U.S. domestic and foreign policies in context: the context of the African-American religious experience, the context of the candidate's connection to the church and, above all, the context of this country's unresolved experience of what Obama correctly refers to as "the original sin" of the American experiment -- human bondage -- and its legacy.
The speech was masterful in this regard. Obama took the time to explore questions that rarely if ever get a fair hearing in American politics. He avoided cheap theatrics, such as an blunt rejection of Wright as an individual or a spiritual leader. "Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely -- just as I'm sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed," the senator acknowledged.
"But," Obama added, "the truth is that isn't all that I know of the man. The man I met more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations to love one another; to care for the sick and lift up the poor. He is a man who served his country as a U.S. Marine; who has studied and lectured at some of the finest universities and seminaries in the country, and who for over thirty years led a church that serves the community by doing God's work here on Earth - by housing the homeless, ministering to the needy, providing day care services and scholarships and prison ministries, and reaching out to those suffering from HIV/AIDS."
The was not merely gracious, it was instructive. Indeed, it was an essential component of the "teaching moment" – the part that made the rest of what
Obama was saying more real and credible.
The other part of what made this particular "teaching moment" so successful was the candidate's recognition that it was not merely his task to open up a deeper discussion. He also had to challenge his listeners.
Obama issued that challenge in what was the essential section of what may well be the essential speech of the 2008 campaign -- and, if Obama succeeds, of the presidential campaigns of the future.
"Let us find that common stake we all have in one another, and let our politics reflect that spirit as well," the senator told the crowd in Philadelphia and the millions who tuned in via radio, television and the internet.
After too many campaigns diverted into the void of Willie Horton smears and Swift-Boat charges, Barack Obama called American politics to a higher ground:
"For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as spectacle--as we did in the OJ trial--or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in the aftermath of Katrina - or as fodder for the nightly news. We can play Reverend Wright's sermons on every channel, every day and talk about them from now until the election, and make the only question in this campaign whether or not the American people think that I somehow believe or sympathize with his most offensive words. We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she's playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policies.
We can do that.
But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we'll be talking about some other distraction. And then another one. And then another one. And nothing will change.
That is one option. Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come together and say, "Not this time." This time we want to talk about the crumbling schools that are stealing the future of black children and white children and Asian children and Hispanic children and Native American children. This time we want to reject the cynicism that tells us that these kids can't learn; that those kids who don't look like us are somebody else's problem. The children of America are not those kids, they are our kids, and we will not let them fall behind in a 21st century economy.
Not this time. "

4 comments:

Patrick M said...

The Illinois senator recognized that the media-driven dialogue about sermons delivered by Wright had little to do with the content of the pastor's words and everything to do with the color of the pastor's -- and the candidate's -- skin.

If this statement is why you and many others believe this has become a controversy, then you are full of shit.

I can't speak for every single person who has thought this is an issue, but as for me and for most of the people I listen to, it has never, never, never, never, never, never, NEVER been about race. The people that are making a racial issue, including you and the clown that wrote the article, should be ashamed.

It is no wonder to me why there is a racial divide. When one person comments about a minority (especially if it's a black) there is always someone that tries to make it a racial issue.

I'm tired of hearing that it's about race. I'm tired of being told that I can't comment without it being racial. And I'm flat out pissed off that we can't listen to someone's words and analyze them without it being inferred that I might be racist.

And if you think I'm unhinged, wait until my next post. I'll link it back here when I get done venting some more.

Anonymous said...

The only racist I see in this whole thing is Obama. If Obama had thought it was that important to be a bridge to the future he would have left his America and white people hating church years ago. Instead he chose to stay and be a part of the congregation that espouses hatred for America and particularly white America. Obama is just another cynical lying politician trying to slide under the wire without getting caught. He's caught in the middle of a big lie, his life.

It's ridiculous to think that Obama didn't know all about Wright and continue to be a part of that church without be branded a racist too. Let's face it, Obama is a bought into all those things that Wright was saying and so did his wife and they both signed on at Wright's church knowing the brand of racism that was being taught there.

I have to live my life true to myself. I can't live fooling myself or trying to fool others that I'm something I'm not. I had to leave the church I was attending because my Pastor was preaching politics from the pulpit and I called him on it a few times until I saw it was not going to change. I even got up in the middle of his Reformation Sunday sermon with everyone in the church watching and walked right out the door. Even after we had a meeting with the church elders it continued so I said enough, I found another church. It was hard , I felt angry and betrayed but I did what I had to do to be true to my beliefs. Obama did not do those things because he believes in the teachings of Wright. Obama is tied to Wright and there is no other way around it. That's the way it works. No amount of pretty speeches is going to change Obama or his beliefs.

Toad734 said...

JG,

Why don't all those 6000 members of the World Harvest Church, you know Rod Parsley, McCains spiritual advisor's church, stop going to his church when he talks about overthrowing our democracy to make way for a Democracy which can then make war on its citizens?

Maybe he wasn't there that day!

Anonymous said...

Well, now. Patrick and R_J, you have said that Obama is full of it. But listen, elections will be elections and every AMERICAN must do their part and chose for a canadate as i'm sure you educated people are aware off. But did you poeple ever think about why they want to run for president for the first place. Think about it, you complain about the things they might do, but did you take the time to actually sit down and go over their speeches, one by one, in order reach a new understanding. Sure we all made screwups in our lives, but we have a brain, lets use that brain constructively, instead of destructively, think about, that's what i'm asking think about...is it that hard? We all live here, so what change are you trying to bring? Good or Bad, you make the choice...