Paul Revere by Cyrus Dallin, North End, Boston

~~~

General John Kelly: "He said that, in his opinion, Mr. Trump met the definition of a fascist, would govern like a dictator if allowed, and had no understanding of the Constitution or the concept of rule of law."

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

GOP Anti-Gay Faction Celebrates Running Ric Grenell Out of Romney's Campaign


UPDATE BELOW:  Keeping Grenell muzzled!

Listen to this guy, Bryan Fischer, the director of issue analysis at the American Family Association,
celebrate running Romney's foreign policy advisor out of town because he is gay. These are the people Romney will be beholden to and, apparently, the people who will dictate to him who is acceptable for cabinet positions and who isn't, should he become president.


And make no mistake, NO GAY CITIZEN, NO MATTER HOW QUALIFIED, NEED APPLY!

Ric Grenell was hounded out of his position as Romney's foreign policy advisor by the Christianist gay haters, and they're celebrating it with a victory dance.

Imagine what their influence would be if Romney made it to the White House! I don't understand how any member of the LGBT community would want to be part of the GOP--a political party that reviles them--after listening to this hideously bigoted man:











I call Romney spineless.  He can't stand up to this loud-mouthed bigot, how will he deal with America's enemies?  Coward!



From the Washington Post:

"Fischer was central to that “hyper-partisan discussion.” He’s the director of issue analysis at the American Family Association, and he blasted the campaign upon Grenell’s hiring for associating itself with an openly gay man.

Grenell also ran into trouble for a bunch of sexist tweets that he ended up deleting from his Twitter feed. In an interview this afternoon, I pointed out to Fischer that Grenell had deep experience in foreign-affairs flacking, a tour of duty that included working under four U.S. ambassadors to the United Nations. Would Fischer worry that, with Grenell’s resignation, the Romney campaign might have trouble finding someone as qualified? Someone with Grenell’s record as a bulldog vis-a-vis aggressive reporters? Someone who could bash the Obama team in the media? “Absolutely not,” responded Fischer. “I refuse to believe that Richard Grenell was the only qualified individual. I think that hire was about homosexuality, so there will be plenty of qualified candidates [Romney] will be able to choose from.” Straight ones, that is."

"STRAIGHT ONES, THAT IS."

There you go, America.

No gay person, no matter how qualified will be welcome if these bigots have any say in the matter.  And apparently they decide whom Romeny will have as advisors, NOT Romney!  Wow!

What a miserably distopian country these people want us to live in.

UPDATE:

"Sources close to Grenell say that he was specifically told by those high up in the Romney campaign to stay silent on the call, even while he was on it. And this was not the only time he had been instructed to shut up. Their response to the far right fooferaw was simply to go silent, to keep Grenell off-stage and mute, and to wait till the storm passed. But the storm was not likely to pass if no one in the Romney camp was prepared to back Grenell up. Hence his dilemma. The obvious solution was simply to get Grenell out there doling out the neocon red meat - which would have immediately changed the subject and helped dispel base skepticism. Instead the terrified Romneyites shut him up without any actual plan for when he might subsequently be able to do his job. To my mind, it's a mark of his integrity that he decided to quit rather than be put in this absurd situation. And it's a mark of Romney's fundamental weakness within his own party that he could not back his spokesman against the Bryan Fischers and Matthew Francks. "


Charlie Pierce writing in Esquire:

It's remarkable, this shitcanning of Richard Grenell as foreign-policy spokescritter for the Romneybot 2.0. Remarkable still for its being handled with such notable dispatch. First, you hire on the former mouthpiece for authoritarian nutbag John Bolton to establish further your neo-conservative foreign-policy gravitas. It turns out the guy is openly gay, so bonus! (Remember, all you wavering and otherwise vacant "independent" voters: Once, I was going to be a gayer senator than Teddy Kennedy. Nudge-nudge, wink-wink.) Then, of course, the guy turns out to be just as crackers as his former boss — Bad-mouthing the lovely Callista Gingrich? Calumnizing kindly Doc Maddow? My seconds will call on yours, sir! — and, because he's gay, the megachurches scramble the flying monkeys into the air and, within two weeks, Grenell is as fired as an Ampad worker. Quoth the Politico:


"This was an unforced error, and one that could have been avoided if the Romney campaign had simply said early on we have 100 percent faith in Ric Grenell to do his job," said Chris Barron, one of the co-founders of the group GOProud. "Does anyone in the world doubt that if had been an evangelical or a Mormon or a Jewish person that the Romney campaign would not have defended that person? It is hard for me to comprehend why the Romney campaign chose to leave Ric Grenell hanging out there the way that they did." He added, "Every campaign when you're at this moment where you're making the transition from the primary to the general election looks for their Sistah Souljah moment. And this could have been Romney's Sistah Souljah moment. He could have said, look, this is a guy who was spokesman at the United Nations. This is a guy who served under John Bolton ... and by God, I'm not going to let a handful of extremists bring him down."


Read more: http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/richard-grenell-fired-8534269#ixzz1tlMiykZa

This is a shameful example of Mitt Romney's weak-kneed response to outside pressures.  He doesn't have the integrity nor the courage to stand his ground.  He allowed a barking-mad group of homophobic cretins to overrule his choice of a foreign policy wonk. 

Would Romney have allowed an outside group to pressure him to get rid of a Jewish person?  A Mormon? An African-American?  A Latino?  Why is it acceptable for the Christianist bigots to single out a gay person as not acceptable?  Why?

And why didn't Romney have the character to stand up to the bigoted bullies and say NO!  This is the guy I want, and his sexual orientation is not an issue. 

Romney failed.  Big time.

25 comments:

Infidel753 said...

Interesting that it was Grenell's homosexuality, not his misogynistic tweeting, that led the Christian Right to denounce him. Shows what their priorities are.

Anonymous said...

The GOP are anti-women and anti-gay, and anti-Muslim and anti-tax for millionaires. They're the ANTI Party! And the party of No.

Anna said...

I wonder what shade of lipstick your conservative pals will put on this pig.

Shaw Kenawe said...

More on the story from the New Jersey Star Ledger:

"Mitt Romney’s handling of the controversy surrounding Richard Grenell, the foreign policy spokesman he hired who happens to be openly gay, reveals the Republican candidate as insensitive and weak. Grenell resigned his position after he was marginalized by the campaign, the result of a drumbeat of disapproval from conservative commentators.

Thought Romney driving to Canada with a dog in a crate strapped to the car roof was bad? Pity the staffer who runs afoul of the conservative imams now calling the shots of the GOP. It now seems Romney will drop him so fast and hard, that car-roof ride to Canada will look like a carriage ride through Central Park.

Sure, senior officials with the Romney campaign privately urged Grenell not to quit the campaign, according to Washington Post. But apparently these messages were overpowered by Romney's public signals, which included keeping Grenell from commenting publicly on foreign policy matters, as he was hired to do.

The whole incident reeks of a high school cafeteria: The football captain might be nice to a dorky childhood friend in private, but the kid with less clout knows to keep his distance on campus, where everyone is watching.

But these are adults, and Grenell is no dork. He's a recognized expert in foreign policy who worked with John Bolton, President George W. Bush’s emissary to the United Nations. Yes, he is openly gay, but he wasn’t hired to advise Romney on social issues.

The Romney campaign implied Grenell’s sexual orientation was irrelevant when it hired him. “We hired Ric Grenell because he was the best qualified person for the job and has extensive experience representing the U.S. mission to the U.N.,” a spokesperson said at the time."

(cont.)

Shaw Kenawe said...

"Poppycock, as it turns out.

If by hiring Grenell, Romney was trying to signal to moderates that he’s one of them, he failed miserably. Instead, the incident served to underscore Romney’s reputation as a flip-flopper -- the Etch A Sketch candidate willing to shake things up and draw a new position to try and advance his candidacy, no matter which friends that means abandoning on the way."

Shaw Kenawe said...

"In 2012, during the round-table discussion section of March 4 edition of the Meet The Press, its host David Gregory asked one of the panellists Mike Murphy whether the controversy of the conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh's verbal attack (during his radio show) on a Georgetown University law student and feminist Sandra Fluke, describing her as a "slut", "prostitute", "round-heeled" etc, was a Sister Souljah moment for Mitt Romney (the presummed front-runner in the 2012 GOP Presidential Primaries). Murphy replied, "My view is - it could have been and should have been. ... I thought it was a lost opportunity for his campaign." In the same show, another panellist Savannah Guthrie earlier said that had Romney responded forcefully against Limbaugh, that would have shown some political courage, some backbone and ultimately that would have helped him with conservatives."

FAIL and FAIL

Silverfiddle said...

Sadly, I must largely agree with you.

My only quibble is that all politicians are beholden to special interest groups. Look at how dismayed the progressives are at how Obama had kowtowed to Wall Street. Too much money there...

Infidel753 said...

Dog: Top of the car.

Gay adviser: Under the bus.

Women: Back to the kitchen, except the ones who have to work, which is really great.

Atheists? I'm almost afraid to find out.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
S.W. Anderson said...

I don't think Romney cares if he has a gay or lesbian staffer, or someone who has a thing for mannequins. All he cares about is winning the election. He'd probably throw Ann under the bus, if that's what it would take.

Romney knows he needs the heavily bigoted core conservative Republican base to turn out en masse if he's to have any hope of winning. So, the gay guy had to go. That's how it will be in any conflict between getting what he wants and standing by those working for him.

What mystifies me is why any gays and lesbians would support the GOP and its candidates, even if the gays and lesbians consider themselves conservatives ideologically.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Infidel753 said...

SWA: What mystifies me is why any gays and lesbians would support the GOP and its candidates, even if the gays and lesbians consider themselves conservatives ideologically.

It would be interesting to ask them why. My guess is that most are just in denial about how deep the bigotry runs. The Grenell incident may wake some of them up, but I doubt it will be many. Right-wingers are good at ignoring evidence that goes against what they want to believe.

Shaw Kenawe said...

SF, According to what I've read recently, Wall Street is all but abandoning Mr. Obama in contributions this election cycle. They're putting their bets on Rmoney, not Obama. If Obama were so in Wall Street's pocket, why would they do that?

SWA, I read many of the comments over at the blog Joe.My.God. [link to it on my blog list] and the majority are asking the same question. Why would anyone stay in a party whose base disrespects them to such a degree?

Infidel, I don't agree politically with Grenell at all. But this blatant act on the part of the Christianists is so egregious that I think everyone of a fair mind should bellow so loudly that the Romney people will get the message:

"The LBGT community WILL NOT allow anyone to be treated as a pariah and second class citizen!"

Romney needs to pay a political price for this act of cowardice.

Anna said...

shaw are you aware that some cretin on a conservative blog is copying most of your work and passing it off as his/her own?:

"I CALL OBAMA SPINELESS. HE’S A LOUD-MOUTHED BIGOT, AND THE WAY THAT HE DEALS WITH AMERICA'S ENEMIES IS COWARDLY. BARACK OBAMA HAS FAILED ON THE ECONOMY, ON IMMIGRATION, AND OBAMA CONTINUE TO WASTE TAXPAYER DOLLARS ON CAMPAIGN PUBLICITY STUNTS, AND HIS WIFE’S EXTRAVAGANT VACATIONS. THE SAME MICHELLE OBAMA, WHO STATED ON FEBRUARY 18, 2008 "FOR THE FIRST TIME IN MY ADULT LIFE I AM REALLY PROUD OF MY COUNTRY." IS SHE ONLY PROUD OF HER COUNTRY BECAUSE HER HUSBAND CAMPAIGNS TO BE ITS LEADER AND PREVIOUSLY HAS NOT BEEN PROUD OF HER COUNTRY? OBAMA’S CHANGE MADE THINGS WORSE!
THIS IS THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE ENDORSED BY LOUIS FARRAKHAN, THE NATION OF ISLAM, REV. JEREMIAH WRIGHT, THE NEW BLACK PANTHER PARTY AND OTHER ANTI-WHITE AND ANTI-SEMITIC HATE GROUPS
OBAMA HAS FAILED! BIG TIME!"

See my email to find out where this tool is pasting his/her rubbish.

All caps? Apparently you've made an impression on his/her anger spot.

Silverfiddle said...

Shaw: Wall Street goes which ever way the political wind blows. Please don't try to make the ridiculous argument that moneyed big biz does not back Obama. No candidate can do without that support.

My only point was to point out that all politicians are beholden to special interest groups.

@ S.W. Anderson: What mystifies me is why any gays and lesbians would support the GOP and its candidates, even if the gays and lesbians consider themselves conservatives ideologically.

It mystifies me too. Why make common cause with people who hate you?

I think I have an answer. Not everyone succumbs to tribal politics. There are broader interests than sexual identity, such as society, economy, liberty, etc.

Gay conservatives are holding their noses and voting I bet...

Anonymous said...

" If Obama were so in Wall Street's pocket, why would they do that?'

Because they are speculators.

Shaw Kenawe said...

SF: "Please don't try to make the ridiculous argument that moneyed big biz does not back Obama. No candidate can do without that support."

I did not do that.

That's your interpretation.

I merely pointed out that Wall Street is betting most of their money on Romney this time, not Obama. Wall Street's feelings are hurt because public perception of them is so negative, and I guess they blame Obama for that and not themselves.

They've have a great deal of responsiblity for the financial mess this country, and the world, is in. IMO, they are criminals. and Obama and his administration should have investigated and then put their [the big-shot speculaters and gamblers] venal asses in jail for what they did to this country.

Anna, I answered your email. That's amusing. You know what the saying is: "Imitation is the purest form of flattery." Whomever is reading and copying me obviously admires what I write. LOL! And perhaps he or she does so because, as evidenced by the rant that isn't mine, he or she is barely literate. LOL!

Thanks for the tip off.

Silverfiddle said...

They've have a great deal of responsiblity for the financial mess this country, and the world, is in. IMO, they are criminals. and Obama and his administration should have investigated and then put their [the big-shot speculaters and gamblers] venal asses in jail for what they did to this country.

We agree! And I'll take it one step further. The Bush administration should have started the indictment proceedings.

Anonymous said...

Well well, indeed a remarkable meeting of the diverse minds. You both are to be commended.

Shaw, I left a comment at The Swash Zone more in line with the original point of this post.

Dave Miller said...

Les/RN... why are you commenting under Anon?

You, and any other other sane conservative is welcome here, at least by us "libs."

None of our crew has ever felt you should go away and hide, nor for that matter should Silver.

We don't always agree with you guys, but, at least for me, I appreciate both of you guys and you usually well reasoned approach.

Silver, as for you standing up for Obama, I do feel it is the job of principled conservatives, to use RN's phrase, to stand up for, and defend our president when he is unfairly maligned.

Trash his policies, but respect the man. it can be done.

Libs were not always successful at this with Bush, but I know many who were.

Les Carpenter said...

Dave, I appreciate your comments, I really do.

I suppose I chose to comment as Anon because I have tired of all the BS from both extremes, the left and the right.

Frankly being a individual that, as Will over at Contra Reilly has said, has the chutzpah to piss off both the left and the right for it's behavior becomes tiring as you're always a target. But the truth is both deserve it, regularly.

My observation and educated opinion, and I'm sticking to it. Anon or not.

Anna D. said...

It isn't difficult to "piss off both the left and the right." All one has to do is say "both do it" on all political issues.

Of course that isn't true, but saying it apparently makes one feel superior even when it's wrong.

Malcolm said...

By my count, this makes Romney 0 for 3 when it comes to standing up to the fringe elements of the GOP. He had a chance for his "Sister Souljah" moment with Rush Limbaugh, Ted Nugent, and now Bryan Fischer. If this latest incident doesn't show gay Republicans exactly what the GOP thinks of them, I don't know what will.

Les Carpenter said...

Of course, better to carry water right. Of course it does require a modicum of independence and requires thinking outside the box. Too difficult for some I imagine.