"A scholar whom President George W. Bush appointed as vice chairwoman of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Abigail Thernstrom has a reputation as a tough conservative critic of affirmative action and politically correct positions on race.
But when it comes to the investigation that the Republican-dominated commission is now conducting into the Justice Department’s handling of an alleged incident of voter intimidation involving the New Black Panther Party — a controversy that has consumed conservative media in recent months — Thernstrom has made a dramatic break from her usual allies.
“This doesn’t have to do with the Black Panthers; this has to do with their fantasies about how they could use this issue to topple the [Obama] administration,” said Thernstrom, who said members of the commission voiced their political aims “in the initial discussions” of the Panther case last year.
“My fellow conservatives on the commission had this wild notion they could bring Eric Holder down and really damage the president,” Thernstrom said in an interview with POLITICO.
The criticism has focused attention not just on Thernstrom, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, but on the partisan nature of the Civil Rights Commission and on a story that, like the controversy over the anti-poverty group ACORN, has raged almost completely outside the mainstream media.
The facts of the case are relatively simple. Two men were captured on a video standing outside a polling place in a black Philadelphia neighborhood on Election Day in 2008. One of the men had a nightstick, if an unclear agenda — though a member of the black nationalist New Black Panther Party, he had earlier professed loathing for the Democratic "puppet" candidate, Barack Obama, who went on to overwhelmingly carry that precinct.
Three Republican poll monitors filed complaints of intimidation — itself a federal crime — but no voters attested to being turned away. The Justice Department, while Bush was still president, investigated the incident and later, after Obama took office, decided that "the facts and the law did not support pursuing" the claims against the party and against a second, unarmed man, Justice spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler said.
But the issue galvanized long-running conservative complaints — including by former Bush administration lawyers — that the government doesn’t take black racism seriously, and the incident has become a huge source of controversy among conservatives.
Fox News and other conservative media outlets have turned the Justice Department’s handling of the case into the subject of the sort of intense, contained interest that’s becoming increasingly common in an age of polarized and ideological media.
The liberal group Media Matters has counted 95 segments on Fox at least partially devoted to the story, much of it driven by “America Live” host Megyn Kelly, who focused on it during 45 segments, including one that discussed whether Fox’s own coverage had been racist.
Fox News did not return calls asking for comment on its coverage."
[skip]
Thernstrom, who had openly mocked the commission’s hearing on the case, put her dissent in writing last week in National Review, where she said the incident was “racial theater of very minor importance” and “small potatoes.”
And other conservatives have weighed in on her side.
“There are more important issues to go after Attorney General Holder on even in terms of the voting rights section itself,” said Linda Chavez, president of the Center for Equal Opportunity, who was staff director of the Civil Rights Commission in the Reagan years and called the video “damning” but relatively minor.
You won't read any of this on the conservative blogs, since it is contrary to their narrative that Mr. Obama is ruining the country. And besides that, it would take away another dry bone they love to chew on--believing minorities who have been discriminated against since the founding of this nation are reverse racists.
5 comments:
More of the same-old same-old. Throwing whatever mud they can come up with at Obama, desperately hoping something will stick.
Shaw: This is my take on the issue. Samir Shabazz hates Whites, as we are well aware because he’s made no secret of his feelings. Considering the polling district, where he was standing holding his nightstick, was predominantly Democratic and mostly likely to vote for Obama, leads me to believe he wasn’t there to intimidate voters but to intimidate Whites. Exactly what he hoped to accomplish by intimidating Whites, I have no clue as I’m not filled with anger and hatred toward anyone so I can’t even begin to unravel his hate-filled mind.
I have read up on this case and Shabazz didn’t even show up for the hearing which means he lost by “default”. It makes no sense why he didn’t for his defense. But again, I don’t know the workings of his mind and goodness knows, I probably don’t want to.
I guess since no one was injured or prohibited to vote the DOJ believes that by forbidding Shabazz at the polling place (possibly his voting district?) until after the 2012 election is enough retribution.
Too bad they can’t get him into some therapy.
All Fox has to do is say Black Panther to get the Pavlovian response it wants from its viewers. I'm sure that's what they count on.
Lets talk about how to eat a balanced diet ... ya know ... a little protein, carbs, fruits, vegetables, etc. I wish our friends of the other persuasion would spend less time watching Crock News and more time watching other news sources ... ya know ... PBS, BBC, NBC, or CNN ... ya know ... a balanced diet with less junk food journalism.
My diet is comprised of only three basic food groups ... crustaceans, mussels, and bagheads.
Turn off your television before it destroys you. Save the screen for viewing DVDs.
Headlines and current events can easily and in far more (Wikipedia anyone?) detail be followed here on the internets.
Still worth reading in print:
The New Yorker. NY Times. Harpers. Mother Jones.
More on the internets:
Information Clearing House. Crooks and Liars. Hullabaloo. Real Clear Politics. ZFacts. Conceptual Gorilla.
Do not on for any reason spend time at:
Drudge. Huffington Post. Salon.
Post a Comment