George Zimmerman Charged With Aggravated Assault, Must Surrender Guns
George Zimmerman, who was acquitted in 2013 of shooting and killing unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin, won’t be able to stand his ground for a while. He was arrested late Friday night on charges of aggravated assault and domestic violence with a weapon, reports CNN.
The 31-year-old Zimmerman was arrested by the Lake Mary Police Department at 10:10 p.m., according to the John E. Polk Correctional Facility’s website. Zimmerman appeared in court Saturday morning and a $5,000 bond was set.
Judge John Galluzzo gave Zimmerman until Tuesday to surrender his firearms and said he must appear in court by mid-February, reports the Orlando Sentinel.
File under continuing news on petty thugs.
20 comments:
Deante, Keyshawn, Tyreeq, Tayontay, Cavonte, and all these other names mothers are giving their sons, the most unexpected is "Unarmed."
At least it's easy to spell.
What do names have to do with this post?
So how are his right wing fans defending him this time?
Zimmerman is a victim of the liberal media, is just an average man who did the right thing for himself and his community. And Trayvon Martin is still dead. Killed legally by a concerned citizen and neighborhood hero! In fact I’d bet that there's probably at least another kid who is alive today because of it.
If' you liked that, then I've got more comedy gold where that came from.
What do names have to do with it? I've just heard "unarmed" so many times used as a descriptive of young men who brutally attacked others before being shot that it seems like "unarmed" is their first name.
"Unarmed" isn't anyone's name, it's an adjective to describe what Treyvon Martin was.
"Deante, Keyshawn, Tyreeq, Tayontay, Cavonte, and all these other names mothers are giving their sons..."
There isn't a thing wrong with any of those names. Nothing. They're actually creative and beautiful to pronounce. Can we please leave what mothers name their children out of this? Thanks.
Meanwhile: Throckmorton, Hortense, Cuthbert, Mortimer, Brunhilda, Brutus, were all accepted names a long time ago. I'd rather call a child Deante (Day-Ahnt-Tay) any day.
hi, i'm larry; this is my brother darryl, and this is my other brother darryl.
So, by the act of simply printing these names, you assume I'm making fun of them?
Projection much? lol
What have you got against these names?
Joke, which is a Josh is a troll dat ain't droll. The Post is concerning a idiot with a power complex....a real life TROLL...who uses his misanthropic views to kill.
now, blow away. Free Thinke awaits youl
"So, by the act of simply printing these names, you assume I'm making fun of them?
Projection much? lol
What have you got against these names?"
No. The question is why did you choose those particular names? Why not Joshua, Carter, or Nikola? Sofia, Emily, or Madison?
Let's not be too cute.
"Let's not be too cute."
Let's not be too dense, either.
Reread my original post, if it's not too much trouble.
My contention, which is obviously facetious, I would think, is that people are naming these young men "Unarmed," since that's what's forever said, which would be a rather unique name, don't you think?
Are Joshua, Carter and Emily unique names like Unarmed would be? Not really. Pretty common names, whereas Keyshawn, Tayontay, Cavonte were some of the more unique names given to the young men I grew up with. Not Joshua, Carter or Emily, but rather original names you don't hear that often, like would be the case with Unarmed.
Unarmed Jones.
Has a ring to it. Yet an unexpected name to give a child.
So who would have believed you could repeatedly extend your 15 minutes of infamy for self-defensing to death a black kid armed with skittles by beating up a white chick every now and then? Ain't Derpmerika great?
I agree with okjimm:
That boy Josh
Is a troll, by gosh.
Either ignore the bore
Or show him the door.
Yeah. It seems as if showing someone the door you don't agree with is the progressive way.
Take a vote, I say.
As long as it makes your day.
Dissent need not to stay.
Personally, I see "Josh said..." And I jump to the next commenter.
Josh: “I think I may have lost the context earlier. I'm in about 12 of these discussions strewn out all over” [January 10, 2015 at 2:38 PM].
Which is precisely why we consider you a troll … and why your stale accusation of intolerance holds no water here. You’re merely an argument junkie, adolescent and immature, arrogant and egotistical, and so in love with yourself, you have no self-awareness whatsoever. In short - a BORE, nothing more!
To: Stupid Things Conservatives Say
While perusing comments at the Smut Hut under this post (timestamp – January 12, 2015 at 6:23 AM), I noticed this text string:
“Which is precisely why I consider you a troll … and why your stale accusation of intolerance holds no water . You’re merely a”Conservative” argument junkie, adolescent and immature, arrogant and egotistical, and you have no self-awareness whatsoever. In short - a BORE, nothing more!”
Please note the resemblance to my comment above (timestamp - January 12, 2015 at 4:31 AM). In other words, sometime between 4:31 AM and 6:23 AM, you read my comment here, copied and PLAGIARIZED IT, then posted it at the Smut Hut – attributing my words as your own.
NOTE: I DO NOT APPRECIATE ANY PLAGIARISM OF MY WORDS.
Nor do I appreciate your pirating my words and then posting them over there - on a forum in which I want no further contact.
SO STOP IT, DIRTBAG ... before I get really mean and nasty!!!
Whoever masquerades as Stupid Things Conservatives Say also masquerades as Black Lives Matter. The same plagiarized text was posted on this site [timestamp - January 12, 2015 at 9:08:00 AM EST].
No, I don’t take it as a complement.
It’s THEFT, pure and simple!!!
A "bore" that you can't get enough of, obviously.
And I find interesting the ways in which people choose to handle such a troll. By refuting what I actually say? Hell no! That would require work or actual thinking.
Instead, just throw some accusations out there, attempt to insult, and hope the troll just goes away.
The "we" is lol worthy, though. I'll hand that to ya. I'm not sure what your big contribution is that you'll take it upon yourself to be the arbiter of proper blogging etiquette. Maybe you're just the right-thinking type, though.
As for an argument junkie: Somebody needs to point out to whiny apologists that they're willingly giving away nations due to their irrational fear of fingering Islam a villain. With their made-up phrases like "Islamophobia" to provide thin cover, real people are actually suffering and dying as they play ostrich. It's a matter I take very, very seriously; it's a matter very close to my heart. But maybe I should adopt the OCTOPUS strategy: Add nothing, but critique all. Gallop in upon my high horse and look down at the plebeians. Maybe sprinkle in a nursery rhyme for flavor.
(O)CT(O), they copied and pasted my comments and post as well. It's some childish game they play on Lisa's Smut Hut, and the other site you linked to.
It's brainless and stupid but perfectly suited to the derps who play that game.
Post a Comment