Paul Revere by Cyrus Dallin, North End, Boston

~~~

General John Kelly: "He said that, in his opinion, Mr. Trump met the definition of a fascist, would govern like a dictator if allowed, and had no understanding of the Constitution or the concept of rule of law."

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

Post-SOTU Reflections and the Continuing War of Words by (O)CT(O)PUS of The Swash Zone

Contrary to the constant sneer and jeer of rightwing rhetoric, President Obama has always been a centrist politician and hardly the “socialist dictator” as alleged by Republicans.

Perhaps Jon Stewart expressed it best last night: “President Obama is apparently now in the 'f*ck it' stage of his presidency" - given six non-stop years of legislative obstruction, filibustering, gridlock, and Godwin-style name-calling

F*ck it, indeed. Consider this ABC News interview of Warren Buffet and his secretary, Debbie Bosanek, who reveal an inconvenient truth about the American tax system:
 

What drives income inequality in America? Debbie Bosanek pays a Federal income tax rate of 35.5%. In contrast, her boss pays 17.5% on income estimated to be 200 times greater!
Everybody in our office is paying a higher tax rate than Warren,” she says.
I pay hardly any payroll taxes, Buffet admits. “Gov. Romney hardly pays any payroll taxes. Newt Gingrich hardly pays any payroll taxes. Debbie pays lots of payroll taxes,” he continues.
Repeat this admission across the economic spectrum of American life, and what you have is a massive redistribution of income from the middle class to a special privileged class. Yet, Republicans have lashed out: They dismiss Buffet’s admission as an act of “class warfare.” One has to ask: Which side of this war is hurling the bombs?

Here are more inconvenient facts: Since 1979, the productivity of American workers has risen 80%; yet, the wages of these workers have risen less than 11%:

Please note the precipitous rise in income for the privileged class: Over 240%.  In other words, American workers have put enormous wealth into the pockets of their employers, yet received next to nothing in return.

Since 2001, this trend has turned ever more ominous as shares in the national economic pie have essentially turned upside down. Middle class wage increases have fallen to less than one percent. The überclass now pockets a whopping 99% slice of the national pie but constitutes only 1% of the population.

Meanwhile, US multinational corporations are laying off workers at home and shipping jobs overseas:
Given these data, consider this thought experiment: If you are a Kochroach raking in $1 billion per year, what is the cost benefit ratio of spending $100 million on PACs and stink tanks to avoid a tax hike? The difference between a 17.5% tax rate versus 35.5% (drum roll) is:


$180,000,000 each and every year
for as long as ye shall live (badda boom)!
[The GOP] has built a whole catechism on the protection and further enrichment of America's plutocracy. Their caterwauling about deficit and debt is so much eyewash to con the public … [The GOP] could not abide so much as a one-tenth of one percent increase on the tax rates of the Walton family or the Koch brothers, much less a repeal of the carried interest rule that permits billionaire hedge fund managers to pay income tax at a lower effective rate than cops or nurses” (Mike Lofgren, Reflections of a GOP Operative Who Left the Cult).
Mike Lofgren's words explain the stalking point phrases of “class warfare” and “job creators” framed and marketed by PACs and stink tanks to protect the überclass. Now you know why the Kochroach Brothers spend buckets of bucks to convince ignorant country bumpkins to vote Republican - and against their own economic self-interest.

Recently one of those country bumpkins - or perhaps a psy-ops troll employed by the überclass - left this comment under a recent post by Shaw:
"Just compare the "poor" in the US to the rest of the world and you have to come to the conclusion that our system is better for poor people. How much more do you Bleeding Heart Liberals want us to do for these people, most of them ar [sic] lazy slobs anyway who just take, take and take!"  Steve
My reply:
"For your information, most of the impoverished people of this country are the working poor earning subsistence wages - people who mow your damn lawn, pick up your damn garbage, flip your fucking hamburgers, and pick your damn fruits and vegetables under a hot sweltering sun – jobs which shiftless lazy bastards such as yourself consider beneath your contemptible dignity."
In response to President Obama’s State of the Union Address, Republicans have responded with:


"Kommandant-In-Chef" - Randy Weber (R-TX);
6,778 words. 'Benghazi' is not one of them” - Steve Stockman (R-TX);
Obama speech reads like dictates from a King” - Tim Huelskamp (R-KS);
The world is literally about to blow up” - Lindsey Graham (R-SC).

Words and more words, but nothing of substance. How long will the middle class tolerate this bullshit? Historically, no society has tolerated unchecked economic privilege and injustice for long. It is only a matter of time before the war of words spills into the streets. When that day arrives, my choice of weapon will not be ink.

31 comments:

Les Carpenter said...

The pen remains mightier than the sword, for those who can read and think. For the rest? Bottle rockets, grenades, and bazookas I guess.

Carry on...

Anonymous said...

this is an actual quote from a conservative blog...they really, really, really think in these terms...and don't understand their insanity:


"Well excuse me but yes, liberals lost on election day in a very big way. You lost because Obama won. And now just look at the terrible mess this Nation is in. . No, you didn’t win,, we are being subjected to mass liberal hysteria on an unprecedented scale."

This sort of magical thinking where up is down and good is bad has gotten a terrible grip on their sanity and turned a lot of them into messy hysterics...the above quote is quite pathetic...

(O)CT(O)PUS said...

Today’s incompetent and incontinent Gee-Ohh-Pee reminds me of the 1962 James Bond thriller, Dr. No, a morality play of good against evil as our intrepid hero matches wits against a madman hell bent on world domination. In the 2014 remake of Dr. No, we have a political party that says:

No to contraception,
No to abortion,
No to healthcare reform,
No to curbs on carbon emissions,
No to a global warming treaty,
No to evolution,
No to economic stimulation,
No to infrastructure investment
No to pre-K education,
No immigration reform,
No to “equal pay for equal work”
No to stopping violence against women,
No to peace talks with Iran,
No to unemployment compensation,
No to raising the minimum wage,
No to civility and decorum in governance,

No, no, no, and a thousand times no! Time to send in Agent Double-Ohh-Seven and his sidekick Honey Ryder.

(O)CT(O)PUS said...

RN,
Your Spectre of self-righteous smugness is wearing thin. Read and think? How offensive!

Perhaps if you were more responsive to the anguish of human suffering, and less smitten with yourself, there would be no need for "Bottle rockets, grenades, and bazookas."

skudrunner said...

The tax inequity is because the tax code favors the rich and penalizes the middle class. The rich can manipulate their deductions so they pay little in taxes, as a percentage. Buffet, Kennedy's, Kerry, Koch and the remainder of the super rich take full advantage of our screwed up tax system.

The poor don't pay taxes so no matter what they will remain the same. The middle class and small business owner are penalized the most by our tax system. No matter what the community organizer says, 250k for a small business is a long way from being rich.

If you have read The Fair Tax, that is the most equitable way tax individuals. It would capture taxes on the underground economy and satisfy the Obama pledge of "it's the right thing to do".

Not that the fair tax will ever pass because the true rich oppose it and they own the politicians, eliminate all deductions, mortgage interest, real estate taxes, charities including churches. Lower the individual tax rate and it would increase the Federal revenue. Of course this would remove power to punish by the politicians so it won't pass either.

Guess we will settle for things to remain the same and we will just bitch about the other side.

Shaw Kenawe said...

"The poor don't pay taxes so no matter what they will remain the same."

This is an untrue statement. The poor pay taxes. Please educate yourself before making silly statements like this.

Shaw Kenawe said...

This is for you, skud, who continues to come here and make ignorant statements about which you know next to nothing:

Most of the people who pay neither federal income tax nor payroll taxes are low-income people who are elderly, unable to work due to a serious disability, or students, most of whom subsequently become taxpayers. (In years like the last few, this group also includes a significant number of people who have been unemployed the entire year and cannot find work.)

Moreover, low-income households as a group do, in fact, pay federal taxes. Congressional Budget Office data show that the poorest fifth of households paid an average of 4.0 percent of their incomes in federal taxes in 2007, the latest year for which these data are available — not an insignificant amount given how modest these households’ incomes are; the poorest fifth of households had average income of $18,400 in 2007.[6] The next-to-the bottom fifth — those with incomes between $20,500 and $34,300 in 2007 — paid an average of 10.6 percent of their incomes in federal taxes.

Moreover, even these figures greatly understate low-income households’ total tax burden because these households also pay substantial state and local taxes. Data from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy show that the poorest fifth of households paid a stunning 12.3 percent of their incomes in state and local taxes in 2011.

When all federal, state, and local taxes are taken into account, the bottom fifth of households pays about 16 percent of their incomes in taxes, on average. The second-poorest fifth pays about 21 percent.




SOURCE

Les Carpenter said...

I. shall take your comment under advisement (O)TO(PUS).

Shaw Kenawe said...

Executive Orders? Even so-called historians seem to have lost their minds over them, or perhaps got their degrees from a correspondence course instead of a real college or university:

"The crew on "Morning Joe" once again turned to Jon Meacham on Thursday to provide an historical context for the show's steady drumbeat of conventional wisdom, and the Pulitzer Prize-winning author sounded pretty skeptical of President Obama's pledge to take more executive actions.

"We make fun of the executive orders and that is in fact something that — you know, you never really heard Lincoln and FDR say, 'I'm going to rebuild America on an executive order," Meacham said. "You know, it's not something that resonates off the tongue."

Meacham's take was somewhat baffling. Franklin Delano Roosevelt issued more executive orders than any president —3,522 to be exact and 1,719 more than the next closest president — including several that helped usher in New Deal programs. And Abraham Lincoln, of course, issued a pretty famous executive order known as the Emancipation Proclamation."
Josh Marshall, TPM

Les Carpenter said...

Oh, and thank you for adding the exclamation point to my point (O)CT(O)PUS.

Jerry Critter said...

Good list (O)ct(o)pus. While Obama talks about what he wants to do, the republicans continue to talk about what they won't do. Democrats are for things. Republicans are against things.

(O)CT(O)PUS said...

RN,
You're so vain, you probably think this post is about you
You're so vain, I'll bet you think this post is about you
Don't you? Don't You? Don't you?

skudrunner said...

The poor pay some federal taxes but not income tax which is what I meant but you knew that didn't you.

That is the only comment about my post is the poor do pay taxes?

Les Carpenter said...

Nope (O)CT(O)PUS, actually I do not. But if that is your perception it IS your reality.

okjimm said...

the poor don't pay taxes???? everytime you purchase anything...you pay taxes. iF YOU PAY A LANDLORD RENT...you indirectly pay taxes...if you buy gas...you pay taxes.

//would capture taxes on the underground economy //
ohohoh...that must be when poor people sell their stuff at rummage sales and craig;s list to get by



//



Shaw Kenawe said...

Skud, you said the poor don't pay taxes, so I stopped reading after that. Why bother?

(O)CT(O)PUS said...

RN: "for those who can read and think"

Are you suggesting, by implication, there are people here who don't read or think? If so, who did you have in mind?

Les Carpenter said...

No (O)CT(O)PUS I am not suggesting, by implication there are people in this forum who don't read or think.

I simply suggest that for those who choose to read and think the pen remains mightier than the sword. I choose to believe also there are more that read and think to gain greater understanding than not.

I also think those who don't read and then apply thought to the issues facing our nation will be the first to use bottle rockets, grenades, and bazookas.

Passion for a cause is fine. Blind and non listening unyielding extremism is dangerous. There certainly are elements of that in American politics today.

It does not matter whether it is Tea Party extremists or Occupy Wall Street extremists, neither is healthy.

Sometimes it is best to just read, listen, keep your thoughts to yourself, and just smile to yourself.

okjimm said...

Skud....yes...if you did not read shaw's response...the poor do pay federal income tax.
//The poor pay some federal taxes but not income tax which is what I meant but you knew that didn't you. //
Unemployment is also taxed and must be reported.

"Unemployment benefits are considered taxable income and the unemployment compensation you receive must be reported when you file your federal and state tax returns. "

so ...how 'poor' are you talking about? If you have been out of work...for any extended period of time...you are on your way to being poor...and you are still are tax liable. Double back again. It was a quick goodle search, you could have done it yourself.

you stike me as being reasonably intelligent....please fact check statemtns.

Shaw Kenawe said...

okjimm, skud likes to come here and whine about the fact that Barack Hussein Obama is the president.

He's been pissed off over that for 5 years. And the poor soul has 3 more years to go.

Pity, that.

skudrunner said...

OK

On unemployment you may deposit taxes but you get that back when you file. If you earn enough to Pay taxes you are no longer poor.

Underground economy "underground economy is the market in which goods or services are traded illegally" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_market

Drug dealers, prostitution, and moonshiners would fall into that category.

The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders said...

Octo: RN, your Spectre of self-righteous smugness is wearing thin. Read and think? How offensive! Perhaps if you were more responsive to the anguish of human suffering, and less smitten with yourself...

What? Is this intolerance, quick temperedness, and character-disorientation from Octo against his "neighbor" RN? Or maybe Octo thinks he respected RN as a friend and neighbor, but RN didn't return the complement a hundred fold?

(O)CT(O)PUS said...

RN: "for those who can read and think"

Before you equate oppression and impatience with ignorance and thoughtless, I suggest you consider:

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them …

Here is a trivia question: What do these dates in history have in common - 1776, 1789, 1917, and 1968.

Tick tock … your answer please?

Les Carpenter said...

"Tick tock … your answer please?"

Sorry I'm so damn dubb I had to work today and the clock ticked for so long but here ya are.

1) America's Declaration of Independence

2) Bill of Rights

3) Russian Revolution/Pravda calls for killing capitalists, Catholic Priests, and officers {Your favorite (O)CT(O)PUS?}

4) Civil Rights Act

Equality, or so they dreamed.

Bada Bing...

(O)CT(O)PUS said...

You got only two out of two (sort of):
1776 - The American Revolution (correct)
1789 - The French Revolution (wrong)
1917 - The Bolshevik Revolution (partially correct)
1968 - The Beatles released their song "Revolution."

(Bada Boom)

(O)CT(O)PUS said...

BTW, the Civil Rights Act was passed in 1964. Now let's all have a group sing-a-long:

You say you got a real solution
Well, you know
We'd all love to see the plan
You ask me for a contribution
Well, you know
We're doing what we can
But when you want money
For people with minds that hate
All I can tell is brother you have to wait
Don't you know it's gonna be all right
All right, all right ...


Let's call its a wrap.

Les Carpenter said...

All four answers were technically correct (O)CT(O)PUS, and I guess it depends on a persons world view as to whether or not it is seen that way.

Yup, call it a wrap, for now.

Lines have been drawn, forcing everyone to chose a side.

It ain't over until it's over.

Jerry Critter said...

Let the "shooting" begin.

(O)CT(O)PUS said...

But RN ...
You missed the word "Revolution" in all four dates. From this perspective, you only got one right.

Les Carpenter said...

Russian Revolution, aka Bolshevik Revolution.

(O)CT(O)PUS said...

Admittedly, I chose 1968 as a gotcha question.