The Koch brothers have been busy, busy, busy setting up organizations so that they can secretly funnel money to them for the purpose of lying about Obamacare and defeating any sort of legislation that deals with climate change.
"The money and reach of this organization are completely unique in American politics. Filings show that the network backed by the Kochs and their donors outspent all other independent conservative groups in 2012, and it even matched the spending of the national coalition of labor unions.
The difference between the Kochs' network and the labor unions, however, is that labor unions aren't nearly this sneaky with the source of their political donations.
According to an analysis of tax returns by the Post and the Center for Responsive Politics, the 17 conservative groups you see above have pretty deep pockets. In 2012, they raised at least $407 million and funneled it to conservative campaigns across the nation.
This surpasses even Karl Rove's super PAC, American Crossroads, which raised a comparatively paltry $325 million. Because the donors are unknown, it's unclear how much money comes directly from the pockets of the Koch brothers and how much comes from outside sources. But we do know where it is going.
Most of the money flows through two non-profits that essentially function as banks that feed the money to other conservative organizations. The biggest of these faux banks is the Freedom Partners Chamber of Commerce, which brought in nearly $256 million in its first year alone according to WaPo.
Because Freedom Partners is structured as a business league, the majority of that money came from "dues" paid by its 200-ish members, and these members only have to disclose their affiliation if they feel like it. Freedom Partners and TC4 Trust — a similar organization that is now defunct — funneled most of their funds to national conservative organizations."
Here's another one of their anti-Obamacare propaganda scares exposed as a lie:
"Americans for Prosperity, the conservative advocacy group backed by the Koch brothers, is running Obamacare attack ads featuring a cancer patient who claimed her treatments were 'unaffordable' under the new health law.
On Monday, The Detroit News reported that the patient will actually save more than $1,000 a year.
Julie Boonstra says in the anti-Obamacare ad that she was diagnosed with leukemia five years ago, and her health care plan was canceled when Obamacare went into effect.
'Now, the out-of-pocket costs are so high, it's unaffordable,' she said."
Shameless lie brought to us by the Kochs.
And then we have the half-wit, half-governor saying:
'Yes We Can' Has Become 'No You Can't' Thanks To Obamacare'
Because that's what the squirrels in her head told her.
Best comment on Palin's clown act at CPAC:
"...to understand what she is saying all you need to do is throw in a series random hate thoughts, mix them with a strong dash of vinegar laced cluelessness, a soupcon of junior high mean girl attitude, some finely shredded 15 year old girl word salad, stir and allow it to fester and decay into an indigestible hot mess of ignorance laced with bigotry.
She thinks she’s the life of the party as the standup comedian where ever she is paid to screech, while most people around the world who are aware of her existence, see her as the punch line for every joke that starts with what’s wrong with America, be it the stupidity of people held up as leaders on the right or the more ridiculous level of stupidity shown by people who support and pretend to be able to decipher the juvenile gibberish she speaks in."
18 comments:
I for one am proud that Senator Reid chooses to expose Charles Koch and David Koch, for what they are: slimey, pancreatic Americans who have devoted their lives to advancing their billionaire empires.
Right you are they are truly disgusting.
Except for the 200 million they give to cancer research and another 200 million given to the arts and culture, they are just like Soros.
Unlike the Koch Brothers who give to aid society, Soros gives to reinvent his view of society.
skudrunner, continuing in his inability to read and comprehend wrote: "Right you are they are truly disgusting."
Which was not written ANYWHERE by me.
And then he cluelessly says the Koch brothers give to aid society, but George Soros gives to reinvent it.
Hmmmmm. Skudrunner, you are priceless in your willfull disregard for facts.
PS. Anyone with gazillions of dollars can give to "the arts" and to "research" to make him or herself look like upstanding members of society while at the same time buying off politicians to advance rightwing political agendas, like denying global warming and loosening regulatory laws on energy companies.
So the Koch brother gave 200 million to cancer research and 200 million to the arts?
Soros has been active as a philanthropist since 1979, when he began providing funds to help black students attend Cape Town University in apartheid South Africa. In the intervening years, he has established a network of philanthropic organizations active in more than 50 countries around the world. These organizations are dedicated to promoting the values of democracy and an open society. His foundation network spends about $900 million annually.
SOURCE
Thanks for confirming what I said about both the Koch brothers and Soros. One helps heal diseases for all the other tries to change society to meet his standards of what he thinks is right. "These organizations are dedicated to promoting the values of democracy and an open society"
I must have read moonspat response wrong because I thought he was calling the KB slimey instead of harry. My mistake.
The Koch Krew should catch up to the 21st century .
Well, skudrunner that is nice of them.
The cancer research should come in handy after their recent shenanigans in West Virginia.
Hey, trade your water supply for some research money. What a deal.
You know, skud, Bernie Madoff also made a point of donating to charity.
Bill & Melinda Gates who know squat about education make a big point of funding groups pushing for more standardized testing and school privatization.
All you need is money. Melinda Gates is the lead developer of freaking Microsoft Bob and that (along with her cash) makes her an ideal proponent of national education policy.
The Kochs donate to the arts, right?
How much of that money gets down to the artist? Come on, they must commission a symphony or two, public sculpture, poetry prize.
No, not one cent. What they do is contribute enough to building funds to get their name displayed prominently in order to polish their rather tarnished images.
You think these guys give a damn about the state of contemporary poetry or theater or painting?
Do you really?
Yes they give the obligatory money to cancer research in addition to generating a number of cases. Good business move, right?
The Koch Brothers only wish to aid society and not impose their will.
Please, really, bore me later.
Skidbummer...I think the topic was HOW much money they contribute to spread fear and enhance their own pocket.
200 mil is merely a tax deduction'''''' 100BB is real money...at your expense
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/21/keystone-xl-koch-brothers_n_4136491.html
quit drinking the Kool Aid....don't be a Koch sucker.
And who can forget Kenny Boy:
"$996,158 to Rice University. This was to be the first of three installments of a $3,000,000 gift to fund the Ken Lay Center for the Study of Markets in Transition. Presumably, Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code was not the sort of transition that Ken Lay had in mind. Rice University and Enron have enjoyed a particularly symbiotic relationship. In fact, in the spring semester of 2001, the ethics professor from the Jones School of Business took a sabbatical to work at Enron. The Rice web site is silent about the sort of ethics he found there."
does skidrunner know that end-stage dumb is now covered by Obamacare and he should...look into getting coverage?
Ducky,
You are so funny you make me laugh. You do realize that the Koch brothers support the institutions who contain the arts. The restaurant industry supports the performer/artist.
Better to be a "Dike" than a DICK.
Of course sometimes ... smaller donors are needed, skudrunner.
Libertarians like to ask why we think the gargantuan degree of economic equality that has grown up in the last 30 years is such a problem. What harm does it do if some people are obscenely rich? Isn't it just envy?
Well, cases like this illustrate why it's such a problem. There were some raised eyebrows at a man of Romney's wealth running for President, but when you have people to whom Romney's fortune is the kind of money they could lose down the back of their sofa cushions, pouring resources into propaganda spreading deliberate lies and distortions to sabotage efforts to bring health coverage to the uninsured -- then it's no longer just a matter of "these people are rich". It's a malignant cancer on democracy. Huge concentrations of wealth create dangerous concentrations of power.
Oh, and the fact that somebody makes donations to good causes is perfectly irrelevant to the issue of the same person also using his power to do harm. That's merely another case of right-wing change-the-subject trolling.
Soros's philanthropy in eastern Europe mostly supports education. The Kochs spend money to attack any political initiative that challenges their preferred libertarian social model. It's not hard to see which is actually trying to impose a particular view of society.
Education that is directed at indoctrination of a specific ideology.
That is cool. As long as all opposition ideologies are equally represented.
Take it from there...
Education that is directed at indoctrination of a specific ideology.
Bullshit. You know nothing. Most of what he does contributes to buying basic school supplies and things like that.
Oh, I see. Thanks.
It is not the "most" that concerns me with Soros.
The Koch brothers are two of the worst Americans in this country! They are ZEROES!
Post a Comment