Or as I like to refer to them: "The Barking-Mad Dogs of the Blogsphere"
Here's an example of their spittle-flecking, vein-popping rage over Mrs. Obama's trip to China:
"Moochie In China! Correct me if I’m wrong, bit didn’t they say that the first lady, aka the Moocher was going to be staying away from controversial issues, but instead she was going talk about education during her visit !! Well I guess I missed the part where she had decided instead to spread her BS about telling the Chinese about American values and traditions . She could have also told the Chinese why she refused to allow the press along on her trip, doesn’t that express American values and traditions? And doesn’t that directly send the wrong message not only to people in the United States but also to Chinese citizens, about the LACK of Freedom of the press! And I wonder if she’s talking about how things are going in the White House these days? Like having another High Cost taxpayer funded vacation in China in a $8,350-per-night suite, while Hubby takes a separate one in Florida, her school lunch program that bombed, t he White House pastry chef just quit, the Russians calling her husband (our president “week”)[sic] and here she is talking up the family values plan, and playing Ping Pong! And she talks about “For the first time she is Proud of her country!” She is and will forever be an embarrassment to our country. ."
h/t S.H.
Okay, it's true when one gets oneself up into a froth of rabid anger, grammar and spelling mistakes increase--and the result is hilarity.
The uninformed, low-information, hair-pulling, scare-heads are in really good form over their favorite target, Michelle Obama.
But, as we all know, those who bitch the loudest about the FLOTUS are usually the ones who know the least. And that is true in this case, where the clam-heads fulminate at the top of their hate-choked lungs over a FLOTUS who is NOT the most traveled of all our First Ladies.
When it comes to travelling First Ladies, Laura Bush's name leads all the rest.
And Mrs. Reagan took 100 trips during her time as FLOTUS.
But don't tell them. It'll spoil their usual tantrums, self-important indignations, and their favorite hobby: Pooping green bricks over what Mrs. Obama does or doesn't do.
At least it's better than their usual passtimes: sticking forks in their eyes or eating paste.
I wonder why these barking mad dogs weren't foaming at their mouths over the many trips First Ladies Laura Bush and Nancy Reagan took. I wonder what's different about Michelle Obama.
Anyone?
23 comments:
She is a Democrat and...well, you know. Wink wink!
This of course just a rhetorical question, but... If the statement that the ones who bitch the loudest are the ones who know the least is true does it also apply to liberals, lefties, and progressives who bitch the loudest? :-)
RN, you know very well that I don't go around to conservative blogs "bitching" about conservatives.
I should have qualified that statement to say "the ones who bitch the loudest about the FLOTUS..."
When I visit your blog, I state my opinions. I don't think I've ever left a comment that even approaches the idiocy in the comment highlighted in today's post.
The "bitching" remark is about the nitwit who wrote that comment. And there is no doubt that he or she and their kind never, never give up on their bitching about the First Lady who does nothing different from other FLOTUSes.
It's all so, bitchy.
Yeah, yeah, Jerry, that's it. She's a Democrat.
That's the ticket. /sarcasm/
Stephanie wrote:
"As these vicious progressive animals rage about the cost of the Bush’s trips, it is important to remember that George and Laura Bush spent time in their own ranch or family compound, they didn't disrupt the entire countries cities or the rest of the world or break the bank with his or his wifes luxurious extravaganza's.."
Dear low-information wingnut, the chart shows that Laura Bush's 212 trips WERE ALL TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES. Those 212 didn't include trips to her second home.
Notice how the idiots don't even read what the chart said.
No wonder they vote Republican.
I guess Mrs Regan took an entourage of 70 people with her and her mother. Maybe it's because so many people are struggling more than ever now,losing their homes and deciding whether to eat or pay the electric bill and the Obama's vacation like royalty
some what off top[c.... I can't believe this ,,,,,
http://www.thenorthwestern.com/article/20140321/OSH01/303210284/Lineups-announced-changes-store-Waterfest
Ted Fuycking Nugent
.... a fund has been started...to pay him NOT to comes
Michelle Obama & Her Entourage Arrive in China & Beijing Hotel Workers Say They’re Already Fed Up
After having arrived in China for a “cultural visit,” First Lady Michelle Obama, her daughters Sasha and Malaya, and her mother are staying in an $8,350-per-night Beijing presidential suite.
Despite 24-hour butler service and other exclusive perks that come with the primo lodging, Mrs. Obama’s entourage has inconvenienced pretty much everyone, claim the hotel staff. According to the Daily Mail, senior hotel staffer said that Marian Robinson, Michele’s mom, has been “‘barking at the staff” since she first arrived at the hotel.
The American press was not allowed to accompany the Obama ladies on the trip, which the White House is billing as a “cultural exchange.” In other words, this appears to be yet another “vacay on the taxpayers’ dime.” It’s not clear what “culture” the First Lady exchanged with the Chinese.
As for why it was perfectly fine for Michelle to drag along her daughters and mother on the trip, Tina Tchen, the First Lady’s chief of staff and a first-generation Chinese-American, said a multi-generational visit would be appreciated by the Chinese, who value tradition. How convenient, huh?
Yeah, well, maybe the Chinese who don’t have to wait hand-and-foot on America’s royal family appreciate the visit. As for those who are forced to attend on bended knee, perhaps the experience isn’t quite as ingratiating.
The White Hose pastry chef quit?
Holy culinary arts, Batman, that wasn't reported by the "lamestream" media.
Clearly the start of a palace revolution.
Anonymous, what you've copied and pasted here is all hearsay, which you and the other Obama haters eat up like a writhing mass of larvae on a pile of you know what.
New York Times, Reuters, Time, and HuffPost all reporting on Mrs. Obama's trip to China.
Shaw, exactly what makes you think I was talking about you? I view liberals, progressives, and lefties broadly. That and I did say it was rhetorical.
There is indeed Plenty of bitchy lefties. I'm sure you know a few. My point was general and the reason for it should be, well, understandable.
Within the narrow confines of this post you are right. Righty nitwits (not all righties are nitwits however) like your quoted are indeed clueless.
I could name a few lefties that are clueless but I'll leave that for you. I know you're fair and balanced.
For ignorant folks like Anon above, here's a link to "Slavery By Another Name."
He or she isn't curious enough to discover how this country continued to enslave African-Americans well past the Emancipation Proclamation. They'd rather live in ignorance than in the clear, liberating light of truth.
We must continue to face what this country did to millions of human beings. Folks like "Anon" believe in "Never Remember," rather than "Never Forget."
It's what people who are ashamed do.
So what because people who are white are supposed to live their lives apologizing when they are concerned about how to pay their own bills and dealing with struggles bigger than themselves.
Of course you don't want anyone to see this
www.youtube.com/watch?v=hX864fXR1A0
Anonymous, your comment makes no sense. Who's apologizing to whom?
If you are referring to remembering slavery, how is that "apologizing?"
Do you consider remembering the Holocaust "apologizing?"
Your statement carries a lot of guilt in itself. YOU not I, not anyone in this discussion, is putting blame on anyone.
Your attitude is the same sort of mistaken attitude right wingers adopted when President Obama gave a speech in Egypt and talked about our history in the Middle East.
Right on cue, the know-nothing loud mouths SCREAMED! Obummer went on an apology tour!!!!!!!!111!
It's very liberating to grow up and become a rational adult.
Try it.
Anonymous said...
"I guess Mrs Regan took an entourage of 70 people with her and her mother. Maybe it's because so many people are struggling more than ever now,losing their homes and deciding whether to eat or pay the electric bill and the Obama's vacation like royalty."
Anon, I don't know how old you are, but we do not live in the same era as when the Reagans were in the White House.
If economic problems are the only measure by which we should approve of First Family trips, explain Nancy Reagan's 16 trips (including London and Monaco) during one of our worst recessions?
See this isn't about the Obama First Family traveling to China as Americans are struggling . It's about hatred of the family that currently lives in the White House.
Be honest with yourself and the reasons why you're in such a lather over this trip, it will be so liberating.
You want me to grow up like these "informed" people?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=mm1KOBMg1Y8
Anon, no, grow up and stop whining about the family in the White House.
a perfect example of stupidity wrapped up in self-righteous hubris:
"I am constantly amazed by the fact that leftists will believe that pigs can fly before they will acknowledge the Almighty.
I laugh whenever I hear one of these morons demand, “Show me the proof.” As if there is ANY proof whatsoever in any of the scientific theories. You see, that’s what theory means: conjecture.
The idiot who wrote that has no idea what a scientific theory is, but that doesn't stop him from making an ass of himself.
"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." --MLK
This is the part of their thinking that shows what they're really about: EXCLUSIVITY. They're not interested in their Savior's idea of loving one another, the brotherhood of humankind. They want to deny the club to outsiders and they revel in the idea of those who can't get in spending eternity in suffering.
Who would want to belong to a club that had this jerk as a member:
"And they’ll believe that there are aliens before acknowledging the Almighty God. Personally, this is okay with me. I don’t want to spend eternity in heaven with a bunch of leftists. I really don’t.
And if they deny their Father in Heaven, he will one day deny them"
StCs,
A lot of people don't know the difference between a scientific theory and a non-scientific theory.
The person who wrote the above is just another example of someone who doesn't know the difference. We had a president, Ronald Reagan, who embarrassed himself by saying Evolution was "just a theory." He didn't know the difference either.
Scientific theory:
A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. If enough evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, it moves to the next step—known as a theory—in the scientific method and becomes accepted as a valid explanation of a phenomenon.
Another definition of the word "theory:"
When used in non-scientific context, the word “theory” implies that something is unproven or speculative.
BUT:
"As used in science, however, a theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena.
Any scientific theory must be based on a careful and rational examination of the facts. In the scientific method, there is a clear distinction between facts, which can be observed and/or measured, and theories, which are scientists’ explanations and interpretations of the facts. Scientists can have various interpretations of the outcomes of experiments and observations, but the facts, which are the cornerstone of the scientific method, do not change."
Okay, so the person who wrote that in your comment was just either too lazy to look up the different meanings, or he or she is willfully stupid.
"Science without religion is blind
Religion without science is lame
Someone said that."
Yes. A jackass.
After reaming through these blogs, frankly, it puzzles me, I really don't get it. I have spewed a lot of time trying to understand the Liberal mind. I really want to understand where they're coming from., but for the life of me I just can’t seem to understand where these pupils like Dave Miller, Ducky, Liberialmann, Shaw, and the links of them, what are they thinking? And frankly, they distrust me. their hamhocks of America nauseate me. their false reverse racism offends me. Thy just revamp me.
And when they use Jesus/Christianity to back themselves up, it focuses me like a zombie movie. There just HAS to be a rational expiration date for their way of winking, but I just can’t figure it out.
It is not that hard. Perhaps you are just not smart enough, Uncle.
Post a Comment