Thursday, November 27, 2025
Wednesday, November 26, 2025
ONE OF THE BEST THINGS YOU'LL READ TODAY:
Monday, November 24, 2025
TRUMP'S VENDETTA GETS THROWN OUT OF COURT
It's not just Trump's incompetency and corruption that played out here, this embarrassing failure belongs to Pam Bondi, Trump's consigliere. She owns this as well.
Saturday, November 22, 2025
Meidas Touch:
🚨 “This is stunning — and dangerous: The Trump administration’s much-hyped 28-point “peace plan” for Ukraine — the one Trump claimed Zelensky had days to accept or the U.S. would pull support — turns out not to be a U.S. plan at all. According to new reporting from PBS NewsHour’s Nick Schifrin, senators were just briefed that the document actually originated from Russia.
Sen. Mike Rounds confirmed that the plan was delivered to Trump envoy Steve Witkoff by someone believed to be representing Russia. Sen. Angus King says the document is “essentially the wish list of the Russians.”
Meanwhile, Trump endorsed it. His spokesperson publicly touted it. Allies condemned it. And Ukraine was told to treat it as an American proposal.
This isn’t a “leak.”
This is a foreign influence crisis reaching directly into U.S. national security decision-making.
How did a Russian-drafted ultimatum to Ukraine end up being pushed by Trump’s team as American policy?
And why is Rubio now denying involvement after Axios reported he helped craft it?”
Thursday, November 20, 2025
"I was only following orders," is illegal.
The family is out shopping and doing errands, so I have a moment.
The Mother Ship is upset because some Democrats have said that the military is not obligated to follow ILLEGAL orders. Apparently the Mother Ship sailors and captain believe soldiers, etc., SHOULD obey illegal orders.
In a post on his "Truth" Social, Trump suggested that the Democrats who said soldiers are not required to follow ILLEGAL orders should be tried as traitors and hanged.
Here is the law:
Unlawful Orders
This Article is intended to explain unlawful orders in the Military.
A Servicemember can face adverse action for violating a lawful order; doing so is a violation of Article 92 of the UCMJ, and sometimes Article 90 of the UCMJ and Article 91 of the UCMJ. Often, Servicemembers wonder what are lawful orders and what are unlawful orders. Article 92 provides the following guidance regarding unlawful orders:
"Lawfulness. A general order or regulation is lawful unless it is contrary to the Constitution, the laws of the United States, or lawful superior orders or for some other reason is beyond the authority of the official issuing it."
Article 92 also references subparagraph 16.c of the UCMJ, which states the following:
"Inference of lawfulness. An order requiring the performance of a military duty or act may be inferred to be lawful, and it is disobeyed at the peril of the subordinate. This inference does not apply to a patently illegal order, such as one that directs the commission of a crime. The lawfulness of an order is a question of law to be determined by the military judge. [NOTE, the lawfulness of an order can also be decided by a Commander at an Article 15, a General Officer during the GOMOR process, or by a Separation Board/Board of Inquiry]
Authority of issuing officer [or NCO] . The commissioned officer [or NCO] issuing the order must have authority to give such an order. Authorization may be based on law, regulation, custom of the Service, or applicable order to direct, coordinate, or control the duties, activities, health, welfare, morale, or discipline of the accused.
Relationship to military duty. The order must relate to military duty, which includes all activities reasonably necessary to accomplish a military mission, or safeguard or promote the morale, discipline, and usefulness of members of a command and directly connected with the maintenance of good order in the Service. The order may not, without such a valid military purpose, interfere with private rights or personal affairs. However, the dictates of a person’s conscience, religion, or personal philosophy cannot justify or excuse the disobedience of an otherwise lawful order. Disobedience of an order which has for its sole object the attainment of some private end, or which is given for the sole purpose of increasing the penalty for an offense which it is expected the accused may commit, is not punishable under this article.
Relationship to statutory or constitutional rights. The order must not conflict with the statutory or constitutional rights of the person receiving the order.
Wednesday, November 19, 2025
LIGHT POSTING FOR THE NEXT FEW DAYS
My SoCal family is here and my New York family will arrive on Saturday. My oldest grandchild, who lives in Virginia, will arrive on Friday.
We're having an early Thanksgiving.
However, I'll be watching the news for any more of Trump's shenanigans.
The Comey indictment seems to be unraveling.
Tuesday, November 18, 2025
WHY MUST WE SUFFER UNDER SUCH A STUPIDLY CORRUPT MAN?
Either Trump was too lazy to review what his own CIA determined about Khashoggi's murder before meeting again with MBS, or he knew and is deliberately defending the murderer, MBS, because he has business dealings with him.
Either explanation points to Trump's ever-present cupidity in all his dealings with foreign leaders.
"A declassified U.S. intelligence report released in February 2021 indicated that the CIA concluded with high confidence that Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) approved the operation targeting journalist Jamal Khashoggi in Istanbul in October 2018.
"Quiet! Quiet Piggy." --Trump
Monday, November 17, 2025
THIS IS NOT GOING AWAY
Michael Jochum:
Sunday, November 16, 2025
Saturday, November 15, 2025
This is what evil and misogny look like: A MALE BLAMING FEMALE CHILD RAPE VICTIMS FOR WHAT WAS DONE TO THEM
But the Epstein emails show Epstein himself stating that Trump was alone with one of the girls for hours in Epstein’s mansion. Also, we have evidence that Trump and Epstein celebrated “ their secret”. Don’t you wonder what secret they shared?
Beyond all that, though, what the Epstein scandal shows is that very wealthy very powerful men were engaged with Epstein in raping children. Doesn’t that turn your stomach?
All those underage girls hanging out with Jeff & Ghislaine? They were all playing the hypergamy game. Only when the sun came up and the "Prince" hadn't put the slipper on their feet, they blamed Ghislaine, when they should have simply looked in the mirror to see whom they should blame.
They weren't raping children.. The children all appeared to be consenting... or they would have all reported it immediately to the authorities rather than keep playing the hypergamy game.
He said Maxwell was involved in recruiting the girls.
Mr Recarey testified that only two of the girls had any massage experience and the majority of them were under the age of 18.
When asked how Epstein was able to gain access to so many underage girls the detective said: "Each of the victims that went to the home were asked to bring their friends to the home."
Some were paid to recruit, he said, adding: "When they went to perform a massage, it was for [Epstein's] sexual gratification."
MORE EVIDENCE OF TRUMP'S DETERIORATING MIND.
The Epstein files/emails are a hoax ONLY when they implicate Donnie.
Trump has directed his personal lawyer and lackey, Bondi, to open an investigation into the hoax -- but only where Democrats are implicated.
See how that works?
Friday, November 14, 2025
Who's surprised?
Trump says he will ask DOJ to investigate Democrats, business leaders with ties to Epstein
Classic "wag the dog" by an obviously frightened little man who has been exposed as a friend of child sexual predators/pedophiles and who gave preferential treatment to them.
Has anyone thought to ask Epstein's bestie, Trump, why Ghislaine Maxwell is getting preferential treatment in a "club fed" facility, when this has never happened in the case of any other person who sex trafficked children and engaged in sexual acts with those children?
Wednesday, November 12, 2025
Epstein email implicating Trump with an underage victim released on Wednesday
The discussion on the ACA is still ongoing. Thank you to Dave Miller and commenters for participating in the exchange of ideas.
I've interrupted it this afternoon because this is being reported everywhere because of the damning information included in the reports.
We do know from ample evidence that Trump and Melania partied with Epstein and Maxwell for decades. It is not a stretch to believe that both of them, but especially Trump, knew what was going on in Epstein's mansions in New York and Palm Beach. Trump and Epstein were, after all, very close friends.
The emails in the NPR report linked below confirm what everyone suspected: It appears that Trump was part of the criminal activity that Epstein and Maxwell were involved in with underage girls.
Read the article and decide for yourselves.
GUEST POST BY DAVE MILLER
May the ACA Rest in Peace
Obamacare is dead and congratulations are in order for the GOP.
Since the day the law, formally known as the Affordable Care Act,
or ACA was passed in. 2010, conservatives have been doing everything they could
to weaken it, kill it, end it and be done with it.
Even though a strong majority of Americans support it, use it to
keep their medical costs down and stay healthy.
I know this personally.
In 2015, one year after full implementation of the ACA, I found
myself literally doubled over in extreme pain walking into an emergency room in
Las Vegas. As I sat there waiting to be treated, I wondered how much of my
expenses what came to be known as Obamacare would cover.
At the end of my 11 days stay, one surgery and multiple
procedures later, I got the answer, all of it. The coverage I had through the
ACA paid all my doctor bills, my hospital bills, my follow up care, everything.
And according to my doctors, those 11 days saved my life.
Not everything with the ACA is perfect. But one good thing it did
was require insurance companies to cover people with preexisting conditions. It
was a preexisting condition that kept my wife and I up nights, because that
reality made all the regular channels of non-employer based insurance
unaffordable to us, and millions of Americans.
That requirement, or mandate, along with forcing insurance
companies to fund birth control, contraceptives, annual physicals and routine
blood tests and screenings has saved lives, led to better health outcomes,
dramatically lowered teen pregnancy rates and cut abortions, in some states, by over 15%.
But now it is dead, a victim of thousands of little cuts. All
that’s left is to wait for the growing sepsis conservatives have sown in health
care in America to finish its task.
It did not have to be.
The ACA, the signature legislation of the first term of President
Obama had been a progressive dream for years. With a Democratic supermajority
in the Senate, the Democrats could have simply written the legislation and rammed
it through Congress. They chose not to do so.
Knowing real success would need buy-in from the other side of the
aisle and a skeptical American people, the administration fanned out across
Washington and the country to seek input and improvements in the projected
plan.
In addition to over 60 bi-partisan official House discussions in
chamber, there were also over 100 official Senate hearings held in Washington.
Hundreds of amendments were offered with some becoming part of the new
legislation. Members of Congress all across the country held town halls to get the pulse and opinion of
people before the legislation was enacted.
In short, the process was public, done with regular order, negotiated between parties with
substantial input from stakeholders. Additionally, amendments were offered and
considered, all before the law was passed.
And then the empire struck back. Almost immediately conservatives
began looking for ways to eliminate the ACA. In fact, the GOP plan was to kill
it before it took effect and Americans came to like, rely on it and see that
worked. All of which has come to be true in the last ten years.
Conservatives, however, have now voted more than 70 times to
partially or fully repeal the ACA. President Trump has repeatedly lied, telling
America his plan is “coming in two weeks”, “a few weeks”, “next week” and a
“few days .” House Speaker Johnson has repeatedly lied saying the GOP has “a lot
of” health care plans.
None of that is true. Instead, the conservatives of the GOP,
egged on by their partisan supporters, have been working for 15 years to weaken
the ACA to such a point that it no longer works, and then claim its inability
to function requires it to be eliminated.
And their plan, despite a majority of Americans approving of the
ACA, has worked like a charm.
Contrast the conservative approach with how progressives worked
alongside President Bush to improve Medicare to cover prescriptions for
medicines during his term. When that program needed improving, the Dems worked
with the President to make sure it happened.
We saw no effort from conservatives to work to improve the ACA,
with the single exception being Senator John McCain who refused to end the program
during the first Trump term.
The simple truth is this:
Conservatives have for years, dating back to at least Senator
Robert Taft’s run for the GOP nomination in the 1940s and '50s have railed
against progressive legislation. Taft would feel right at home in today’s GOP
as he stridently supported limited government and non-interventionist foreign
policy.
Taft, while initially supporting Social Security and other
programs during the Great Depression, came to believe those programs encouraged
dependence on the federal government.
Then in the 1960s, conservatives used the same language to oppose
Medicare, which President Johnson signed into law in 1965. Today conservatives
see these entitlement programs that have helped lift millions of Americans out
of poverty, and help them be healthy in retirement, as robbing people of their
freedoms.
Finally, we come to what may be the real reason the Trump
Administration has set its sights on the elimination of the popular ACA. It’s
not because it’s imperfect, doesn’t work or doesn’t meet the needs of the
American people. It’s not because the administration believes government should
not be involved in private industry.
Not at all. The real reason the Trump Administration wants the
ACA repealed is because it has become known as Obamacare, and our president is
a petty, jealous man. How do we know the man who had to be shielded from seeing
the name John McCain on a United States Navy aircraft carrier does not like the
name Obamacare?
Because over the last few days he’s been posting and sharing his
belief a new plan should be called “Trumpcare”.
All of this brings us to today.
Earlier this year, conservatives passed a budget in the House to
eliminate millions of dollars of subsidies for the ACA. They knew doing so
without a plan to cover low income people would lead to havoc and families
losing their healthcare, but they did so anyway.
Angry over this, progressives initially refused to go along, and
our government was shut down. Ultimately though, we all knew where this was
headed. The progressive Dems simply did not have the cards or the votes to win
this fight.
This week a handful of Dems gave up the fight.
It was not worth it they said, to crash the entire air traffic
system the Trump Administration was shutting down. It was not worth it they
said to continue to try and force the Trump Administration to abide by a SCOTUS
ruling and provide millions of Americans the help they needed to put food on
their tables. It was not worth it, they said, to continue to expect government
workers, except Congress, to go without pay.
It was not worth it, but it is what cnservatives were willing to
do to America so people could be free, finally they will say, of the ACA and so
President Trump does not have to say “Obamacare”.
Now that the shutdown is over, we can get back to business. The
House must now, unless Speaker Johnson has another exception, officially swear
in and seat Representative-elect Grijalva of Arizona. That will force a vote
Johnson does not want, to release the Epstein files.
Then, in short order I am sure, we can finally see the plan
Speaker Johnson said could only be put forward and revealed once the ACA
subsidies were ended. The time is now here for the Speaker and conservatives to
show their hand.
Unless, as Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene says, that plan does not
exist.