Appropriate for what our country has experienced over this past week (and the past 11 months) because of the convicted felon in the White House:
Appropriate for what our country has experienced over this past week (and the past 11 months) because of the convicted felon in the White House:
Conservative David Brooks wrote this in an Op-Ed in the NY Times in April of this year:
"Trumpism… is primarily about the acquisition of power — power for its own sake. It is a multifront assault to make the earth a playground for ruthless men, so of course any institutions that might restrain power must be weakened or destroyed. Trumpism is about ego, appetite and acquisitiveness and is driven by a primal aversion to the higher elements of the human spirit — learning, compassion, scientific wonder, the pursuit of justice. …
What is happening now is not normal politics. We’re seeing an assault on the fundamental institutions of our civic life, things we should all swear loyalty to — Democrat, independent or Republican.
It’s time for a comprehensive national civic uprising. It’s time for Americans in universities, law, business, nonprofits and the scientific community, and civil servants and beyond to form one coordinated mass movement. Trump is about power. The only way he’s going to be stopped is if he’s confronted by some movement that possesses rival power. …
I’m really not a movement guy. I don’t naturally march in demonstrations or attend rallies that I’m not covering as a journalist. But this is what America needs right now."
How much longer will we Americans allow this brutal administration to continue their reign of terror?
The US is lost. As lost as it was when it decided to intern Japanese Americans. All the people in this administration and those enabling this will spend the rest of their lives denying they played a role in this horror.
They will be the shame of their children and grandchildren, and the ones who fought it will be the heroes.
Freedom of the Press 2.0… the
post Constitutional Era
Let’s go back to November 2024 and
pretend that Kamala Harris won the election.
Then let’s fast forward to
February 2025, the first full month of her presidency.
Let’s suppose President Harris
started publicly complaining about FOX News coverage of her, calling it unfair,
biased and full of lies. She sues the network and cites the upcoming license
renewal which her administration must approve, all in order to get more
favorable coverage and personally receive millions of dollars.
Now fast forward a few more months
into her presidency. In the late fall we see two major entertainment companies
desiring to merge, a process that needs government approval. Again, not pleased
with the news coverage she is getting, President Harris demands a say in the
future news coverage of her administration in order for her administration to
approve the merger.
Questions…
Is there anything inherently wrong
with either of these two scenarios?
Should a POTUS be able to
intervene in the editorial decisions of independent news agencies?
Would the involvement of a POTUS
in the hiring and editorial decisions of an independent news agency impact the
Constitutional right to a free press?
Clearly these examples are based
on how President Trump dealt with CBS News and 60 Minutes and the proposed
merger of Warner & Netflix or Warner & Paramount.
Paramount, the parent of CBS.
Larry Ellison and his son David, both Paramount leaders have a strong
relationship with President Trump and approved the payments made by CBS
directly to Trump. Additionally, President Trump has publicly said he will be
involved in the Paramount deal to acquire Warner, the parent company of CNN.
Trump’s son in-law Jared Kushner is also a major player in the prospective
deal.
Had Trump, been POTUS when my father and mother applied for their citizenship, they would have been stopped by his administration because they were immigrants from Sicily. People from Sicily and other southern Italian regions were perceived as an "undesirable" population.
"Italians encountered widespread discrimination rooted in nativist prejudices, racial stereotypes, and economic anxieties. Perceived as culturally and racially inferior, Italian immigrants faced exclusion, violence, and systemic marginalization.
Southern Italians looked unlike any other European group to arrive to the Americas before: Dutch, English, French, German, Irish, and so on. All Norther European. However, Mediterranean Italians are generally darker, and easier to stand out in a crowd—so they were easy targets to begin with.
Sensationalized media coverage, including newspaper illustrations, reinforced the association of Italians with organized crime, violence, and laziness. These stereotypes ignored the diversity of the immigrant population, 99% of whom were laborers seeking honest work."
The Trump administration is engaging in the same type of discrimination against an entire population because of a few "bad apples" and Trump's and his administration's racism.
Here is a partial list of Italians Trump's goons would have kept from achieving their American citizenship had he been POTUS when southern Italians and Italians from other regions were considered undesirable immigrants.
Frank Sinatra's parents
Enrico Fermi
Fiorello LaGuardia's father
Dean Martin's father
Joe Dimaggio's parents
Joe Montana's parents
Lee Iacocca's parents
Anthony Fauci's parents
Jill Biden's grandparents
My father came to America through Ellis Island and eventually landed in Boston where he worked as a barber in Scollay Square.
We lived in Boston and eventually moved to a Boston suburb where, through hard work and savings, he eventually built our family home, bought the building in which his barbershop was located, and sent his children to college. All this was achieved by a Sicilian immigrant, and this story was duplicated by millions of others from southern Italy.
****************************
Abrupt Cancellations: Immigrants across the U.S. reported arriving at their scheduled ceremonies, only to be "plucked out of line" by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) officers who asked their country of origin.