“Be where you are, otherwise you will miss your life.” — Buddha
Appropriate for what our country has experienced over this past week (and the past 11 months) because of the convicted felon in the White House:
Conservative David Brooks wrote this in an Op-Ed in the NY Times in April of this year:
"Trumpism… is primarily about the acquisition of power — power for its own sake. It is a multifront assault to make the earth a playground for ruthless men, so of course any institutions that might restrain power must be weakened or destroyed. Trumpism is about ego, appetite and acquisitiveness and is driven by a primal aversion to the higher elements of the human spirit — learning, compassion, scientific wonder, the pursuit of justice. …
What is happening now is not normal politics. We’re seeing an assault on the fundamental institutions of our civic life, things we should all swear loyalty to — Democrat, independent or Republican.
It’s time for a comprehensive national civic uprising. It’s time for Americans in universities, law, business, nonprofits and the scientific community, and civil servants and beyond to form one coordinated mass movement. Trump is about power. The only way he’s going to be stopped is if he’s confronted by some movement that possesses rival power. …
I’m really not a movement guy. I don’t naturally march in demonstrations or attend rallies that I’m not covering as a journalist. But this is what America needs right now."
How much longer will we Americans allow this brutal administration to continue their reign of terror?
The US is lost. As lost as it was when it decided to intern Japanese Americans. All the people in this administration and those enabling this will spend the rest of their lives denying they played a role in this horror.
They will be the shame of their children and grandchildren, and the ones who fought it will be the heroes.
Freedom of the Press 2.0… the
post Constitutional Era
Let’s go back to November 2024 and
pretend that Kamala Harris won the election.
Then let’s fast forward to
February 2025, the first full month of her presidency.
Let’s suppose President Harris
started publicly complaining about FOX News coverage of her, calling it unfair,
biased and full of lies. She sues the network and cites the upcoming license
renewal which her administration must approve, all in order to get more
favorable coverage and personally receive millions of dollars.
Now fast forward a few more months
into her presidency. In the late fall we see two major entertainment companies
desiring to merge, a process that needs government approval. Again, not pleased
with the news coverage she is getting, President Harris demands a say in the
future news coverage of her administration in order for her administration to
approve the merger.
Questions…
Is there anything inherently wrong
with either of these two scenarios?
Should a POTUS be able to
intervene in the editorial decisions of independent news agencies?
Would the involvement of a POTUS
in the hiring and editorial decisions of an independent news agency impact the
Constitutional right to a free press?
Clearly these examples are based
on how President Trump dealt with CBS News and 60 Minutes and the proposed
merger of Warner & Netflix or Warner & Paramount.
Paramount, the parent of CBS.
Larry Ellison and his son David, both Paramount leaders have a strong
relationship with President Trump and approved the payments made by CBS
directly to Trump. Additionally, President Trump has publicly said he will be
involved in the Paramount deal to acquire Warner, the parent company of CNN.
Trump’s son in-law Jared Kushner is also a major player in the prospective
deal.