Paul Revere by Cyrus Dallin, North End, Boston

Thursday, November 5, 2026

GUEST POST BY DAVE MILLER

 



Recently our friend Skud responded to a few questions I asked in a comment thread. I felt his comment would be better addressed in its own post.

 

Skud is an admitted cynic when it comes to public service in the federal government. He believes Congress and its members are corrupt, and that people run for office to get rich and become part of an “elected elite.”

 

According to Skud, little in America will change because Congress “is not about running the country for its citizens, it is all about running the country for [themselves] the politicians.”

 

One of the main things Skud thinks Congress is good at “is increasing their wealth.”

 

These are criticisms we hear frequently from Americans across the political spectrum. So recently, I asked Skud a simple question:

 

“What would you like our political leaders to do for America? For our people? For you?”

 

Here are his responses…

 

•   I would like to see out elected elite create a balanced budget and honor it.

•   I would like to see our elected elite protect veterans.

•   I would like to see our elected elite spend money to help with the homeless issue instead of building a bridge to nowhere.

•   I would like to see our elected elite vote for term limits and congress being on medicare and a federal pension not a four years and you are set for life.

•   I would like to see our elected elite work for we the people instead of we the elected elite.

•   Our elected elite are suppose to be smart yet they can't figure out how to provide for basic healthcare for all, how to provide for veterans, how o clean up our streets and control violence and enforce the law.

 

Skud, I see your concerns, and I agree with many of them.

 

You've said before that you'd like to throw everyone in Congress out and start over. But realistically, that's not going to happen. So we're left with the government we have and the challenge of making it work.

 

And that brings me back to my original question. How do we actually solve these problems?

 

Some are easier than others. Congressional self-dealing, for example, seems like something we ought to be able to address through bipartisan legislation. There's widespread agreement that something needs to change.

 

But balancing the budget, providing healthcare, addressing homelessness, and taking care of veterans are much more complicated. People disagree not just about the solutions, but about the proper role of government in addressing these issues.

 

We can’t simply say it’s complicated, or that Congress is corrupt, and throw up our hands. We can’t just complain.

 

Being a citizen requires more than just diagnosing our problems. That’s easy. Citizenship also requires thinking about and helping propose solutions to our problems.

 

And I believe that’s why many people run for Congress in the first place. To be part of the solution.

 

So here's my question to you Skud and the rest of our little band of commenters. Given the political realities we're dealing with, how would you address the problems you've identified?

 

Not by throwing everyone out and starting over, but by working within the system we actually have.

 

 

 


8 comments:

Dave Dubya said...

Skud wants services he doesn't want to pay for. Taxes are the cost of civil society. Let him chew on that.

Dave Miller said...

Maybe Dave D... let's wait and see. The devil is always in the details. I'm hoping we don't get folks saying we can do it all by eliminating fraud. There's not enough fraud to cut to make up a 2 trillion dollar short fall.

As Les as said, and so have I, at some point we need to address income/taxes. And no fair tax idea I've seen has been able to get the income we need.

skudrunner said...

Dube, When did I say we shouldn't pay taxes or are you just being obtuse. Do I want our elected elite to not waste our taxes, yes. Do I want everyone to pay their Fair Share, yes. Do I object to taxes, doesn't everyone, but that is the price of government, I just wish they would be smarter.

Now Dave, you took out my best suggestion by saying replacing all of them is not realistic. Then you made the suggestion that they act in a bi-partisan way which hasn't happened since Reagan-O'Neil and with the current climate probably won't happen now.

I do believe most politicians run because they want to help but then they are lambasted by lobbyist who give them the chance to be paid an outrages amount of money to give a short speech at a function. Or they are told of an opportunity to invest in something that is going to happen and then they are owned and expected to repay the favor.
Then they face the fact that one term means lifetime salary and power to control people and they are in for life. Markwayne Mullin said he was only going to run for one term then power got hold of him and he is a lifer.

Now the republican party is dead because of this defeat. Was the democrat party eliminated after the obama loss. They changed after that are are now the DNC/DSA but they still exist just with a different look.
I believe this loss will severely diminish his influence which is a good thing for the country and the party.

Shaw Kenawe said...

The planet's richest man, who lives in Texas and is the world's first TRILLIONAIRE!, Musk, spent $450 million on this election to get the results he wanted. He lost. And that huge amount didn't make so much as a scratch in his wealth. Tax the ultra rich!

BB-Idaho said...

If, as skud noted some time earlier, he was banned by Geeeez, he is some
very high rated category. if a bit confused.

Dave Dubya said...

How about a wealth tax? Tax corporations? Taxing partisan churches? Stop the damn wars? Eliminating ICE? Stop building a damn fleet of aircraft carriers and nuclear submarines we don't need? Declare independence from Israel?

This should do for a start.

Dave Miller said...

Skud... replacing them is not realistic. So my question still stands...

How do YOU make what YOU suggested happen, without replacing them all?

For example, you want the "fair tax" what's the rate?

YOU want to balane the budget? Great idea. What programs are YOU cutting and/or what taxes are YOU increasing?

We do spend $$$, lots of it, for homeless ppl. What would YOU do with that money to make it work better. Because I'm in agreement with you. What we ARE doing isn't working.

You see... give us some of your concrete ideas.

Now just some general stuff.

Les Carpenter said...

skud said: I do believe most politicians run because they want to help but then they are lambasted by lobbyist who give them the chance to be paid an outrages amount of money to give a short speech at a function. Or they are told of an opportunity to invest in something that is going to happen and then they are owned and expected to repay the favor.

Exactly the reason Money needs to be removed via campaign finance reform and a national election fund established whereby every taxpaying citizen funds it by a yearly Campaign Tax, of say $10.00. Ending lobbyist totally should be te next step.

Politicians who are reelected cycle after cycle for 25- 30 -40 years become like private sectr employers who are employed by one company for 25-30-40 years. They become institutionalized which can, and often does lead to complancency.

For this reason term limits for representativces, senators, and the scotus should be establised. Smart people can certainly figure out the maximum numbers of years for each position.

I personally think representatives terms should be incresed to four years, reducing the number of election cycles. Besides, for 1'st termers they're back to campaigning in a year. Hardly enough time for some to get to know their jobs well.

If the Republican party is dead that might be a blessing. Maybe they can rebuild from mistakes learned and become a moderate middle of the road party.,. Not likely methinks.