Paul Revere by Cyrus Dallin, North End, Boston

Monday, November 9, 2026

GUEST POST BY DAVE MILLER

 






In 586 BC, the prophet Ezekiel delivered a highly specific and bizarre warning against the wealthy, heavily fortified Phoenician island-city of Tyre. He declared that God would bring many nations against it, stating:

 

"They will destroy the walls of Tyre and pull down her towers; I will scrape away her rubble and make her a bare rock... They will throw your stones, your timber and your rubble into the sea."

 

The exiled people of Israel would wait approximately 254 years before witnessing an extraordinary realization of Ezekiel's words.

 

In 332 BC, Alexander the Great conquered Tyre, using rubble from the mainland city to build a causeway across the sea to the island fortress.

 

This story of enduring faith, and the long wait for the realization of prophecy, is one of many that Christians and Jews have turned to for hope in desperate situations.

 

Recently I found myself thinking of that prophecy and of the late Lindsey Graham, the Republican senator from South Carolina.

 

I remember painting houses by myself during the Clinton impeachment proceedings. Each day I would arrive at my job site, get my radio set up to listen to NPR, and get to work.

 

Graham, an Air Force lawyer, was one of the House impeachment managers. I listened as he prosecuted the case against President Clinton. Graham impressed me, and as a mostly conservative Democrat, I found myself agreeing with him.

 

I thought he had, as they say in politics, legs.

 

So when he decided to run for president in the 2016 election, I was listening.

 

In July 2015, Graham warned about Donald Trump…

 

"I think he's a wrecking ball for the future of the Republican Party with the Hispanic community."

 

And in March 2016, Graham was even more unequivocal.

 

He warned that Trump would be an "absolute, utter disaster" for the Republican Party, destroying conservatism as he knew it. Republicans, he predicted, would be wiped out, and recovery would take generations.

 

Another Republican presidential candidate, Marco Rubio, offered his own warning that March.

 

Speaking about Republicans who supported Donald Trump, Rubio said:

 

"For years to come, there are many people on the right... [who] are going to be having to explain and justify how they fell into this trap of supporting Donald Trump..."

 

In another interview, Rubio warned that Republicans were becoming a party driven by fear rather than optimism.

 

"If we're going to be the party of fear, we're going to spend some time in the wilderness."

 

He added that Republicans would pay a political price in November and beyond.

 

Those were remarkable warnings, coming not from Democrats, but from two men seeking to lead the Republican Party.

 

And yet, none of those words seemed to matter.

 

Donald Trump won the 2016 election, lost in 2020, then stormed back to power in 2024.

 

Along the way, both Graham and Rubio eventually became supporters of the man they had warned would destroy their party.

 

The prophets, it seemed, had abandoned their own prophecies.

 

Then the people struck back.

 

After a decade of frustration, setbacks, and occasional victories, Democrats broke through in November 2026. The United States of America prevailed.

 

The Democrats didn't just win an election. They won control of both houses of Congress. They captured governorships and legislative seats in places that had long been Republican strongholds.

 

And in state after state, the political landscape was mightily transformed from red to blue.

 

Consider:

 

•           Texas had not elected a Democratic US senator since 1988.

•           Democrats had not controlled Arizona’s state government since 1966, when Barry Goldwater was a US Senator.

•           Kansas had not elected a Democratic US senator since 1932.

•           Mississippi is on the verge of electing it’s first black senator since Reconstruction.

•           South Carolina, Lindsey Graham's home state, elected a Democrat to his former Senate seat.

•           In Georgia, Democrats swept all 10 statewide offices for the first time in over 20 years.

 

As Ezekiel prophesied about Tyre, The GOP walls were broken. The towers were pulled down. The stones and timbers were thrown into the sea.

 

That historic reality brought me back to the two men who, ten years earlier, had warned their fellow Republicans about the consequences of embracing Donald Trump.

 

Lindsey Graham and Marco Rubio.

 

Prophets, in a political sense, who saw something coming that many in their own party refused to see.

 

In 2016, an angry country stepped forward and took a chance on Donald Trump, despite multiple warnings from people who knew the Republican Party from the inside.

 

Meanwhile after the devastating loss, Democrats spent the next decade organizing, campaigning and refusing to surrender their belief that the country could eventually take another direction.

 

That came true Tuesday, November 3, 2026. A political “wrecking ball.” An “utter disaster” for Republicans. And, in Marco Rubio's own words, a journey “into the wilderness” for the GOP.

 

There's one final irony in all this.

 

Both Graham and Rubio recognized the danger in 2016. Both warned their fellow Republicans about it. And both eventually embraced the very man they believed would bring disaster upon their party.

 

Perhaps that's the most remarkable part of this story. It wasn't that nobody saw what might be coming.

 

And ten years later, their prophecies came true.


11 comments:

BB-Idaho said...

Kansas elects first democrat senator since 1932.
Congratulations, Mr. Trump.

Dave Dubya said...

Intelligence without conscience is worse than ignorance.

Les Carpenter said...

My favorite irony of 2026.

skudrunner said...

Stating the obvious. When was the last time either party did not support their parties president. That is the reason Yellow Dog Democrat was coined because the I would vote for a yellow dog if they were a democrat.
This was a trump disaster although he will never admit it or take any blame. He even stated if he was on the ballot the repugs would have won because people loved him. That just shows how deep delusion can run.

Now it is up to the democrats to do something other than play revenge politics. You have the democrat spokesperson yelling about " Carville remarked that Trump's political misery is only beginning, urging the new Democratic majority to focus on anti-corruption measures (such as banning congressional stock trading) and to use popular legislation to test Trump's veto power."
Basically he is saying don't help the people just go after trump. Now they need to do something and have a platform because trump will not be in power in two years when the country can reset.

Dave Dubya said...

Skud,
By "revenge politics", do you mean holding criminals accountable?
"Revenge politics" under Trump was punishment and political persecution of critics and people he hates by the DOJ under his orders.
Is this what you expect from Democrats? That they're no different from Trump?

Shaw Kenawe said...

skud: "When was the last time either party did not support their parties president."

It is rare, but it has happened:

Republican congressional leaders met with President Richard Nixon on August 7, 1974, to formally inform him that his political support on Capitol Hill had completely collapsed.

The current MAGA Republicans still support Trump despite his corruption. The current MAGA Republicans do not have the integrity and allegiance to the Constitution that the Republicans in 1974 had. IMO, they're as corrupt as Trump is.

Here are others:

he Republican Party has historically withdrawn support from or mounted major internal challenges against several other sitting Republican presidents besides Richard Nixon. While the party notably forced Nixon's resignation by withholding its support during the Watergate scandal, it has actively rejected or deeply fractured over multiple other sitting GOP presidents:

1. Chester A. Arthur (1884)

Chester A. Arthur is the only sitting Republican president to be completely denied his party's nomination for re-election. After taking office following James A. Garfield's assassination, Arthur alienated Republican party bosses by championing civil service reform and targeting the political patronage system. Consequently, the Republican Party rejected him at the 1884 convention, choosing to nominate James G. Blaine instead.

2. William Howard Taft (1912)

While the party establishment technically supported sitting President William Howard Taft for re-election, a massive faction of the Republican Party revolted against him. His predecessor and former mentor, Theodore Roosevelt, fiercely challenged Taft for the nomination. When party bosses forced Taft onto the ticket anyway, Roosevelt and his progressive supporters split from the GOP entirely to form the "Bull Moose" Party, destroying Taft's support base and handing the election to Democrat Woodrow Wilson.

3. Gerald Ford (1976)

Gerald Ford faced the closest primary challenge to an incumbent president in modern political history. A dominant conservative wing of the Republican Party withdrew their support from Ford to back Ronald Reagan. The party fractured so severely that Ford only narrowly secured the nomination at a highly contested national convention, leaving him weakened for the general election.

(Cont.)



Shaw Kenawe said...

The Democratic Party and its members have gone against sitting Democratic presidents multiple times in U.S. history, primarily through major primary election challenges and historical shifts in party nominations.


. Lyndon B. Johnson (1968) — The Anti-War Primary Revolt

During the Vietnam War, deep divisions tore through the Democratic Party. In the 1968 primaries, anti-war Democratic Senator Eugene McCarthy launched a direct primary challenge against sitting Democratic President Lyndon B. Johnson. When McCarthy scored a stunning, near-victory against the president in the New Hampshire primary, it exposed how weak Johnson's support was within his own party. Shortly after, Robert F. Kennedy also entered the race against Johnson, which ultimately pressured the sitting president to announce he would not seek re-election.

3. Jimmy Carter (1980) — The Kennedy Primary Challenge

In 1980, sitting Democratic President Jimmy Carter faced a massive intra-party revolt. Fueled by economic stagnation and dissatisfaction from the party's liberal wing, Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy launched a high-profile primary challenge against Carter. Kennedy won several large states and took the fight all the way to a contentious Democratic National Convention before Carter finally secured the nomination. The bitter internal battle severely weakened Carter, who went on to lose the general election.

4. Harry S. Truman (1952) — Early Primary Defeat

In 1952, President Harry S. Truman was eligible to run again, but faced immense dissatisfaction within his party due to the Korean War and low approval ratings. During the very first Democratic primary in New Hampshire, populist Democratic Senator Estes Kefauver defeated the sitting president. Recognizing his lack of party backing, Truman announced his withdrawal from the race shortly after.

BB-Idaho said...

1952 - I was in Jr. High and my dad was a big Kefauver fan. I think it was the
coonskin cap he wore on the campaign trail. I had a sticker on my truck
after visiting the Eisenhower museum in Kansas. - "I liked Ike, heck I even liked Truman". Politics used to be fun.

skudrunner said...

You are correct Ms. Shaw but that was not after they were elected. Both parties support their president while in office except biden and they threw him to the curb, as they should have.

Shaw Kenawe said...

skud: "...but that was not after they were elected. Both parties support their president while in office."

Not so.

Nixon was in office when the Republicans told him to resign. Chester A. Arthur was a sitting president; as was Taft.

Johnson was a sitting president when he was pressured into not running again because the country was against him; Jimmy Carter faced a intra-party revolt; and Estes Kefauver defeated sitting president Truman in the primary.

I don't understand how you did not see these examples as how the Democratic and Republican parties have NOT supported their sitting presidents when the American people have shown they are not happy with them and prefer another politician from their party to run for the president rather than the sitting president. Both Republicans and Democrats do NOT always support the sitting president.

Because Trump cannot run again, the American people's only way to show him that they do not support him nor his policies was to turn his MAGA support on its head. A deafeningly loud repudiation of him and his policies.

Texas is BLUE! Georgia is BLUE. The American people said LOUDLY and CLEARLY that they want no more of Trump's and the Republican Party's corruption.

skudrunner said...

Again you are correct but their parties disapproval came toward the end of their reign. You are also correct that Texas and Georgia went blue which is primarily if not entirely due to trump. My point is now the democrats need to do something other than fight with the other side and focus all their attention on trump because he is not running again. I'm sure you remember 2010 when it was predicted the end of the DNC which didn't happen.

One of the big differences is for one party the person who lost support didn't run the other decided to run and was thrown out.