General John Kelly: "He said that, in his opinion, Mr. Trump met the definition of a fascist, would govern like a dictator if allowed, and had no understanding of the Constitution or the concept of rule of law."
Sunday, October 23, 2016
THIS IS HOW AMERICA AND THE REST OF THE WORLD SEES DONALD J. TRUMP
And today, the Las Vegas Review Journal, long the Yang to the Yin of the Las Vegas Sun, has endorsed Donald Trump, becoming the first "major" US daily to do so.
I wonder what they know that all the other US papers, both liberal and conservative, don't?
You don't think it is possible that Sheldon Adelson, owner of the paper, exerted any pressure on the editorial staff do you?
When the Arizona Republic endorsed Clinton (first Democrat in over a hundred years) they were flooded with profanity, death threats and mayhem. Perhaps 'deplorables' is too kind?
Jerry Critter: Strictly speaking, his acceptance is not required.
Exactly, Jerry. Which is why I don't understand why the Left is making such a big deal about this. Who cares what he SAYS. His supporters will believe what they want regardless. And there is no proof of what he's saying (large scale voter fraud). Hillary Clinton will be inaugurated whether he concedes or not.
Trump says it's being rigged, and the President says "oh, no, that could NEVER happen" (words to that effect). Is the Left no longer concerned with voter disenfranchisement? That's "rigging", isn't it?
5 comments:
Strictly speaking, his acceptance is not required.
And today, the Las Vegas Review Journal, long the Yang to the Yin of the Las Vegas Sun, has endorsed Donald Trump, becoming the first "major" US daily to do so.
I wonder what they know that all the other US papers, both liberal and conservative, don't?
You don't think it is possible that Sheldon Adelson, owner of the paper, exerted any pressure on the editorial staff do you?
When the Arizona Republic endorsed Clinton (first Democrat in over a hundred years)
they were flooded with profanity, death threats and mayhem. Perhaps 'deplorables'
is too kind?
Jerry Critter: Strictly speaking, his acceptance is not required.
Exactly, Jerry. Which is why I don't understand why the Left is making such a big deal about this. Who cares what he SAYS. His supporters will believe what they want regardless. And there is no proof of what he's saying (large scale voter fraud). Hillary Clinton will be inaugurated whether he concedes or not.
Trump says it's being rigged, and the President says "oh, no, that could NEVER happen" (words to that effect). Is the Left no longer concerned with voter disenfranchisement? That's "rigging", isn't it?
Dervish, you left another comment that I inadvertently deleted. Sorry.
Post a Comment