These people vote.

 

This MAGA blogger and her pals advocate shooting to kill (even on the Mexican side of the border) migrants crossing the border into America -- that would mean men, women, and children.

Here, she is asking what can America do to control the border:

"WILL IT TAKE SHOOTING TO STOP THEM?

Have we been forced to go to that?  Stop and Frisk worked quite well, whether leftwingers still don’t like admitting that or not, the cops say it did.  But we had to stop because “it’s MEAN” (boo hoo)  And that was just stopping and frisking!"

Um, no. The reason "stop and frisk" ended is because it is un-Constitutional  -- not "MEAN!" -- a concept MAGAs have trouble understanding. When they or their cult leader, Trump, break the law, they ignore it and cry "boo-hoo" to those who object to breaking the law.  MAGAs honoring America's Constitution is situational: it's lawful when it suits their agenda; it's "boo-hoo!" when it does not.  

 "The controversial policy allowed police officers to stop, interrogate and search New York City citizens on the sole basis of “reasonable suspicion.” 

Judge Shira A. Scheindlin ruled that NYPD's stop-and-frisk tactics violate the U.S Constitution's 4th Amendment prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures."

That is a concept clueless people have trouble understanding.

And here this MAGA blogger asks:

WILL IT TAKE BULLETS?  OR??????????

And one of her commenters answers:

"In defending America, anyone who invades our home might get shot — and while I’ll admit that most of those coming across are unarmed, the people who shepherd them, the coyotes, are armed to the teeth. Coyotes have murdered more than a few border patrolmen and border-area residents. In this sense, these “unarmed invaders” benefit from the protection of armed criminals, and they’re “okay” with that. 

A stern warning may go a long way to cut off the illegal pipeline. ADVERTENCIA: ESTÁS A PUNTO DE ENTRAR AL TERRITORIO DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS. SE HA AUTORIZADO LA FUERZA LETAL PARA IMPEDIR LA ENTRADA ILEGAL 

Do we need signs like this in 100 different languages? Nah … after one shooting, everyone would “get the word.” And, by the way, these intruders wouldn’t be shot IN the United States. There is no need to wait until they crash down the front door. Shoot ‘em while they’re still on the front lawn (in Mexico). That way, we would force Mexico to either prevent their illegal crossing on the Mexican side or bury them. 

And the blog hostess answered:

 I’M GLAD YOU AGREE WITH ME………ONE SHOOTING AND…………….MAYBE THEY’D STOP. WITH PROMISES OF MORE. DONE. 

“OH, Gee!” one might say..”that’s mean and people would DIE!” 

Yes, and people are dying as they walk miles and miles, and get raped, and can’t get food or water….or drown in the rivers….. Probably more than the few we’d shoot. 

 “If the only tool you have is a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail.”

So there you have it. "...Yes, and people are dying as they walk miles and miles...."so let's kill more to solve the problem! 

 A MAGA's approach to ending the border crisis: Shoot 'em, even if it's on Mexican land, just shoot to kill men, women, and children. 

I have an idea! Give this lady blogger an AR-15 and get her to the border so she can fulfill her fantasy of killing migrant men, women, and children so they'll stop coming across the border. It's what Christ would want, isn't it?

I'd like to ask her, "WWJD?" These people often profess that they are ardent followers of Christ, the Prince of Peace. Can we imagine Christ blessing her, the shooter, as she kills men, women, and children to prevent them from entering America the Beautiful, home of the brave and the free? 

I can't. But maybe that's just me.

 Here's what that MAGA blogger won't put up on her blog: 

"Biden has requested $13.6 billion in emergency funds to hire nearly 6,000 immigration and border security-related employees at DHS and the Justice Department as part of a larger package that would also provide tens of billions of dollars in foreign assistance. 

The White House is still engaged in negotiations with a bipartisan group of senators on that package and additional policy changes that would seek to restrict migration, with administration officials and congressional negotiators continuing to work through their differences over the holidays and into the new year. 

 “Instead of joining the Biden administration and members of both parties in the Senate to find common ground, [House] Speaker [Mike] Johnson,” [R-La.,] is continuing to block President Biden's proposed funding to hire thousands of new Border Patrol agents, hire more asylum officers and immigration judges, provide local communities hosting migrants additional grant funding, and invest in cutting edge technology that is critical to stopping deadly fentanyl from entering our country,” Andrew Bates, a White House spokesman, said on Wednesday. He added Republicans previously approved spending cuts for fiscal 2024 that would have resulted in Border Patrol losing 2,000 positions. 

CBP and other agency officials have consistently warned their resources are strained and their workforces are overwhelmed as the administration has reassigned various groups of employees to assist with efforts at the border."