Paul Revere by Cyrus Dallin, North End, Boston

~~~

~~~

Sunday, February 6, 2011

SARAH PALIN™ IN THATland!




I know.  February is supposed to be "Ignore Sarah Palin Month;" but after reading her gobbledethattery on a subject she knows nothing about, I couldn't resist posting her embarrassing gibberish. 

She craves exposure; we'll give it to her.


Palin has ZERO foreign policy creds, but she can't keep her mouth shut about foreign policy, of which she knows nothing.  She's second guessing the president who is privy to information she could not possibly understand.  The following are her silly remarks on a very serious subject. 

"This is that 3 a.m. White House phone call, and it seems for many of us trying to get that information from our leader in the White House, it seems that that call went right to the answering machine."

There she goes again.  What exactly does the second "that" in the above-sentence refer to?

 
Not satisfied with her first and second "thats," she assaults us with two more "thats" but never explains what she's talking about.   Sadly, she cannot tell us how "it seems" like anything but what she conjures in her vacuous imagination. 


"Is it going to be the Muslim Brotherhood," Palin asked. "We should not stand for that, or with that, or by that. Any radical Islamists. No, that is not who we should be supporting and standing by ... we need to find out who was behind all of the turmoil and the revolt and the protests so that good decisions can be made in terms of who we will stand by and support."



Oh yes, a bit of a touch of Lincoln in her ruminations on the Muslim Brotherhood. [Another subject she knows nothing about.] More sprinklings of "thats," because when you have very little to say, "that" is an excellent filler.  Apparently, she wasn't watching the teevee.  Otherwise, she would have seen with her own adorable eyes who was in the street revolting and protesting.  THAT'S for sure.




"Nobody yet has explained to the American people what they know, and surely they know more than the rest of us know, who it is who will be taking the place of Mubarak and I'm not real enthused about what it is that, that's being done on a national level and from D.C. in regards to understanding all the situation there in Egypt."

Where to start?  Nobody has explained to the American people what they know? 


What do the American people know, and when did they know it! 


But then Mrs. Palin says "they" [the American people?] know more than the rest [more American people?] know. 


And why is she not "enthused about what it is that, that's being done on a national level and from D.C.?  When one speaks on a "national level" one IS speaking from DC.

 
So Mrs. Palin wants to know what it is that, that's being done "on" DC and from DC? And, of course, "in regards to understanding ALL THE SITUATION THERE in Egypt."

Where?  THERE!  in Egypt.  Of course. 


My head hurts.


"And in these areas that are so volatile right now because obviously it's not just Egypt but the other countries too where we are seeing uprisings, we know that now more than ever, we need strength and sound mind there in the White House."

"If this is future president Palin's take on current foreign policy, she has a lot to learn. No one in America knows who will succeed Mubarak because right now he's simply trying to satisfy his own citizens on making reforms. In the immediacy of the situation, Egypt has to stop the bleeding before it can think about healing a long-term wound.


Palin simply doesn't understand that the United States can't just interfere with a sovereign nation without damaging our relationship with the rest of the world. If we meddle in Egyptian affairs there will be drastic consequences, nor can we send in our military to back up any assertions of who we want in place of Mubarak. Egypt is a sovereign nation and must decide for itself. It's none of our business, plain and simple."


"When asked what she might do differently if she were to run for the Presidency, Palin said, "I would continue on the same course of not really caring what other people say about me or worrying about the things that they make up, but having that thick skin and a steel spine, knowing that what is needed in America are those things that Ronald Reagan did espouse and what he lived."


This is rubbish, since Mrs. Palin cares very deeply about what other people say about her.  Her skin is as thick as an onion's, since she never misses a chance to strike back at every criticism she imagines is undeservedly aimed at her.  And someone with a "steel spine" would not have quit her job half way through it.  Sarah Palin's "spine" is made not of steel, but of dollars.


"Palin expressed surprise at the reaction to her decision to turn down the coveted keynote speaker position at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington next week. She said she simply did not have time, but she encouraged political debate in general."




"What it is that you're suggesting in the question is should the GOP, should conservatives not reach out to others, not participate in events or forums that perhaps are rising within those forums are issues that maybe we don't personally agree with? And I say no, it's like you being on a panel shoot, with a bunch of the liberal folks whom you have been on and you provide good information and balance, and you allow for healthy debate, which is needed in order for people to gather information and make up their own minds about issues. "

This is unintelligible.  Can anyone tell me what she means?  I get lost in her maze of words at "...in events or forums that perhaps are rising within those forums are issues..."  I may as well be chasing a white rabbit than trying to understand where her thought is going.  [She doesn't know; how can she expect anyone else to?] 


There really is no way to fathom this:  "... it's like you being on a panel shoot, with a bunch of the liberal folks whom you have been on..."


"Palin also criticized the media in general, saying it is becoming irrelevant, she said because of a lack of balance in reporting."




"I want to help 'em. ... I have a journalism degree, that is what I studied. I understand that this cornerstone of our democracy is a free press, is sound journalism. I want to help them build back their reputation and allow Americans to be able to trust what it is they are reporting."


Mrs. Palin reminds us, once again, that she has a degree in journalism so that we understand how knowledgeable she is in all things having to do with fact-finding, accuracy, reporting, and literacy.  


She fancies herself an expert on how journalism should be done.  Afterall, she says she wants "to help 'them'[sic] build back their reputation[sic] and allow Americans to be able to trust what it is they are reporting."


SOURCE


My reaction to Mrs. Palin?

13 comments:

Leslie Parsley said...

My daughters could speak more intelligently when they were in the 2nd grade.

libhom said...

I forgot which WaPoo pundit launched the ignore Sarah Palin month meme. But, it's obvious that it was created to allow her to get her message out there uanswered for an entire month. You did the right thing by posting this.

Leslie Parsley said...

It was Dana Milbank. Anyway, Pravda is right in claiming Palin is not a patriot.

Pamela Zydel said...

The American people know that and they knew that then and they knew that there and they knew that it was being done on a national level there in D.C. because that’s the situation in regards to understanding all the situations that everyone knows there now!

Got it, Shaw?
My goodness, you’re such a blonde!

In all seriousness, you had me giggling out loud with the “that’s” and “there’s”. Palin does mix up her sentences, a lot. I mean, in all honesty, public speaking can be daunting and people can make mistakes, but she does is more often than not. It’s almost like she’s trying to “sound” like she’s not making mistakes. It would be better if she just relaxed; she appears to be trying too hard.

Oh my gosh, and I loved the cat! He plays better than me, I’ll tell ya that! (oh don’t get me started on THAT again!)

Leslie Parsley said...

That Ronnie Jr.had that right when he called that Palin a "soap opera." That boy's far smarter than that dad of his was.

Infidel753 said...

Good grief, she wasn't this incoherent during the 2008 campaign. Babbling like this suggests some kind of mental strain. Maybe the Arizona shootings are weighing on her?

Hugh Jee From Jersey said...

Truth be told, i took the pledge to support the movement Dana Milbank has started, and declared my blog as "SP" free zone for the immediate future. Last week I mulled it over, and finally did it yesterday.

And its because of the gibberish like that you have thoroughly documented here; the woman knows nothing.

Last week Donnie Deutsch said of SP on MORNING JOE....SP is Snooky all grown up. I can't agree more.

She is not intelligent; she is a quitter; she is greedy; she is manipulative; she is deceitful; her second language appears to be English.....and above all, she is not newsworthy.

Life is too short to waste on the trivial and marginal. And it's hard to find anyone quite as marginal as Momma Grizzly.

Silverfiddle said...

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!

Why must liberals continue to talk about than woman, Ms. Palin?

I swear, your dream GOP ticket would be Palin - O'Donnell, and I don't mean Lawrence...

@Hugh Jee:
"She is not intelligent; she is a quitter; she is greedy; she is manipulative; she is deceitful; her second language appears to be English.....and above all, she is not newsworthy."

So she'd fit in perfectly in the District of criminals!

Shaw Kenawe said...

O come on, SF, you're beginning to sound like a cynic.

District of Criminals?

No.

Libertarians want almost no government, y'know, like Somalia.

or Lord of the Flies.

And we comment on Mrs. Palin because she is a champion of a good size wing of the GOP, and millions of Americans actually believe she'd make a good president. No. Seriously.

Also. The same people who believe she'd make a great president also do not "believe" in Evolution.

As we approach the anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin, it astonishes me that the most technically advanced country could have so many ignorant people who actually have the serious responsibility of voting for US officials.

The US is down there with Islamist countries in it's number of citizens who do not "believe" in Evolution.

The radical evangelical right has a lot in common with Islamist in that regard. They are brothers and sisters in ignorance.

Shaw Kenawe said...

"The US is down there with Islamist countries in it's number of citizens who do not "believe" in Evolution."--SK



Good Dog! I've succumbed to the dreaded "it's" when I mean its.

Silverfiddle said...

Darwin is a complex subject, often abused, rarely understood, but that's another topic.

Shaw Kenawe said...

Gravity is a complex subject, too. But we don't hear the same people who say they don't "believe" in Evolution say they don't "believe" in gravity.

Evolution is a fact. That there is any controversy over that statement shows a tragic failure of our educational system.

okjimm said...

Whoa... how come I have never been here before?????
Can I come back? I promise to be nice....mostly....like ya betcha, I am not the sort who would call the White House at 3am.