Paul Revere by Cyrus Dallin, North End, Boston

Monday, August 31, 2026

Trump's Iran Debacle

 

Military leaders warn Hegseth against extending Iran war operations 

A recent classified assessment advised that prolonged large-scale operations in the Middle East risk weakening U.S. capabilities elsewhere. 

 “Several U.S. military leaders have advised Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that prolonging large-scale operations against Iran is unsustainable and risks weakening their ability to confront threats elsewhere, including the U.S. homeland, according to people familiar with a recent assessment prepared for the Pentagon chief.

The warnings — detailed for Hegseth by the heads of the Army, Navy and Air Force and the four-star commanders overseeing U.S. operations throughout Europe, Asia and Latin America — appear in the Aug. 14 edition of the Secretary of Defense Orders Book (SDOB), these people said. They described the assessment to The Washington Post on the condition of anonymity because the document is classified. 

The SDOB, typically produced twice monthly, outlines the worldwide availability of U.S. warships, aircraft, personnel and weapons systems. It reflects the president’s priorities for the force, which are carried out by the defense secretary, and includes insights from the military’s top generals and admirals that inform the directives the Pentagon issues.” 

 

Saturday, August 29, 2026

SATURDAY NIGHT MUSIC



"Dolly Parton was not just a star. She was a real-life angel.

Legendary film critic Roger Ebert once described meeting Dolly as something almost impossible to explain: an uncanny, ethereal grace that left him feeling healed and comforted. He said he walked away “in a cloud of good feeling.” His colleague Gene Siskel had felt it, too. Some people bring light into a room. Dolly seemed to carry it with her.

Long before the world knew her as a legend, Dolly played snare drum in her high-school marching band. After she made it big, she spent decades helping students—especially at majority-Black high schools across the South—get uniforms, instruments, and what they needed to march with pride. No headlines. No photo ops. No fanfare. Just help, given because it was needed. 

That was Dolly: larger than life, but never too large to remember the people who could use a hand. Her songs will live forever. Her humor will live forever. Her voice, her generosity, her wild and wonderful spirit—forever." 

But maybe the best way to keep Dolly Parton alive is to follow the example she left behind: Take your responsibilities as a citizen of the world more seriously. Take yourself less seriously. 

Rest in love, Dolly. The light you gave this world will keep finding its way into dark places."  --Feminist News

 



We will always love her:




Friday, August 28, 2026

Lindsay Clancy Trial

 

Like a lot of people in the country, I've been following the Lindsay Clancy trial.


My reasons are twofold: 

1) To see how the evidence presented by the prosecution and the defense affects the verdict, which will come in the next few days (as of this writing), because the prosecution and defense have given their closing arguments, and

2) I have been personally affected by severe. postpartum psychosis in my own family.

A few months after I was born, my biological mother, who was in her early 40s, began having symptoms very similar to those that were described in the Lindsay Clancy trial, according to my two sisters. My older sister was 16 years old when I was born; and my sister, Josephine, who passed away last March, was 9 years old. They remembered the changes in my mother, and years later told me about the chaos that ensued as she became more and more depressed, disturbed, and disassociative.

Not much was known or even discussed about postpartum depression back then, and so the symptoms my mother presented were considered to be severe mental illness. According to my sisters, my mother never tried to harm me, but the family story is that one day as she was pushing me in the baby carriage in a city very near Boston, she left me in the carriage on railroad tracks near our home. A neighbor recognized the carriage and me and brought me home. My mother had no memory of this. As a result of this and other too painful to report incidents, she was hospitalized in a state mental health facility, and did not come home until 15 years later. Two years after her hospitalization and the report by the doctors who said she'd never recover, my father divorced her and remarried.

I'm being brief here and holding back some information to protect my family. I was able to access the hospital records recently, and read the reports of her treatment by the doctors and nurses as well as the medications she took. She was given electric shock therapy and the drug Thorazine, among many others. She had recovered enough to be able to leave the mental facility and live with my older sister's family, where, at the age of 14 years old, I met her for the first time in person. My father and step-mother kept her existence a secret from me until I was 12 years old.  I never bonded with her, because she never really knew who I was, and my sisters told me she was never the same woman after the onset of her illness and her release from the mental health facility. I was 15 months old when we were separated from each other.



My second encounter with postpartum psychosis was shortly after the birth of my 3rd grandchild and first granddaughter. 

My daughter-in-law had told my son, her mother, and me that she was unable to sleep. This started in the hospital after she gave birth, and continued when she came home with my granddaughter. And it continued for many weeks and months.  My daughter-in-law became disoriented, depressed, anxious, panicky, and despondent because she was unable to sleep and take care of her newborn. Never did we think she'd hurt the baby.

I spent time at their apartment to help out, and took over the night feedings so she could try to get some sleep. At the same time, they were moving from their apartment in a suburb of Boston to their new home being built close to her hometown in New York. My daughter-in-law and my son thought it would be best for her and my granddaughter to temporarily move in with her parents while I helped my son pack up their apartment and so she could receive medical  care near to where her parents lived.

One morning as I was packing things in the kitchen after my son had left to go to work in Boston, I got a call from my daughter-in-law's father. My daughter-in-law had purposefully taken an overdose of sleeping pills and had been rushed to the hospital. If her parents had not found her when they did, she would have died. 

It took months of therapy and hospitalizations and electric shock therapy for her to fully recover, but, thankfully, she did. She has very little memory of that horrible time in her life. Between her mother and me, we were able to care for my granddaughter and keep her safe.

These two very personal, very painful times I experienced in my life are the reasons I am so invested in the outcome of the Lindsay Clancy trial.

My personal belief is that Clancy was not mentally capably of knowing what she was doing when she killed her children. I’ve followed the trial, the evidence presented, and the closing arguments. I was also a victim of what a postpartum psychosis/illness can do to a family. I lost my mother because of it, and found out years later that she had had an underlying bipolar condition. Studies have revealed that a mother with an underlying bipolar illness can suffer severe postpartum psychosis. Luckily, this was not the case for my daughter-in-law.  She had a second high risk pregnancy, but the outcome, a baby boy, was normal and she had no postpartum anxieties or other symptoms like she suffered with my granddaughter. 


***************************************



From my research:


Mild "baby blues" affect up to 80% of new mothers, clinical postpartum depression affects about 10% to 15%, and severe postpartum psychosis is a rare medical emergency affecting 1 to 2 per 1,000 women.

 Baby blues (Minor): Affects 50% to 80% of new mothers; involves mild tearfulness, mood swings, and anxiety that resolve within two weeks without formal treatment.

Postpartum Depression (Moderate): Affects 10% to 15% of women; involves persistent sadness, loss of interest, and bonding difficulties lasting past two weeks.

Postpartum Anxiety and OCD: Affects roughly 8% to 17% of postpartum women; involves intense, intrusive worries or compulsive behaviors.

Postpartum Psychosis (Severe): Affects 1 to 2 per 1,000 deliveries (0.1%); features sudden hallucinations, delusions, extreme confusion, and rapid mood swings, usually appearing within the first two weeks. 

Postpartum psychosis (PPP) is a mental health emergency. This condition affects a person’s sense of reality, causing hallucinations, delusions, paranoia or other behavior changes. In severe cases, people with PPP may attempt to harm themselves or their newborn. This condition is treatable, and early treatment increases the odds of a good outcome. 

What is postpartum psychosis? Postpartum psychosis (PPP) is a reversible — but severe — mental health condition that affects people after they give birth. This condition is rare, but it’s also dangerous 

Who does postpartum psychosis affect? 

Postpartum psychosis can affect anyone who recently gave birth. While it usually happens within several days of giving birth, it can happen up to six weeks after. It can happen to anyone who gives birth, but the odds of having it are higher for people with certain mental health conditions. 

While experts don’t know if these conditions contribute to or cause PPP, they do know that there’s a link.

How common is postpartum psychosis? Postpartum psychosis is a rare condition. Experts estimate that it affects between 0.089 and 2.6 out of every 1,000 births. In the United States, that means it happens in between 320 and 9,400 births each year. Globally, that means it happens in between 12 million and 352.3 million births. 

Mood changes, such as mania (an increase in activity and mood) and hypomania, or depression (a decrease in mood). Depersonalization (some people describe this as an out-of-body experience). Disorganized thinking or behavior. Insomnia. Irritability or agitation. Thoughts of self-harm or harming others (especially their newborn). History of mental health conditions. About one-third of people with PPP have a previously diagnosed mental health condition. The most common include bipolar disorder (especially bipolar I disorder). Other mental health conditions that may increase the risk include major depressive disorder and schizophrenia spectrum conditions.

Thursday, August 27, 2026

Tuesday, August 25, 2026

DAMN!

 

Dolly's gone!






Monday, August 24, 2026

The Malignant Narcissist Wants to Erase Another American Hero's Name

 


Trump faces backlash over reports US navy carrier could be named after him instead of Black war hero 


Sources say US navy is working to rename carrier originally planned to honor second world war sailor Doris Miller


For his extraordinary bravery during the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, Doris Miller was awarded the Navy Cross—making him the first African American to ever receive it—presented to him by Admiral Chester Nimitz on May 27, 1942





The Trump administration has been accused of delivering a “slap in the face” to US military veterans after reports that a navy aircraft carrier set to honor a Black war hero may, instead, be named after Donald Trump. 

 The US navy had previously announced that the carrier under construction would be called the USS Doris Miller, in tribute to a sailor celebrated for his heroism during the attack on Pearl Harbor in the second world war.

But the navy is now working to rename the carrier, CNN reported, citing three sources familiar with internal discussions. Two of those sources said there have been conversations about renaming it to honor Trump, according to the network.

 “This is a slap in the face to every war hero and every service member who has worn the uniform,” said Derrick Johnson, president of the NAACP civil rights group. “Doris Miller earned his place in American history through courage, sacrifice, and service,” added Johnson. “Donald Trump only wants to serve himself.”

*************************

Neither Trump nor anyone in the Trump family going back two generations ever served this country in the armed forces.

Trump, himself, avoided serving in Vietnam by claiming he had bone spurs.

If he had any self-respect (he doesn't; he has only self-love) he would NEVER propose or ask to replace a true American hero's name with his. It is indecent, disrespectful, and foul.

It is beyond disgusting. It plays into Trump's insatiable need to see his criminal name everywhere.

And to be sure, Trump and his sycophants seek to replace Miller's name with Trump's -- a convicted felon and adjudicated sexual assaulter/rapist.

Every person who is serving or ever served our country should strongly object to this pandering to the draft dodger who called those who served and died for their country, "suckers and losers."

My family had several men who served in the US Navy in WWII, and my own grandson served for 10 years.

I am disgusted by this insult to them and any American who served his/her country.

Saturday, August 22, 2026

Thursday, August 20, 2026

Just another day in Trumplandia

 

This is just another example of Trump's blatant dishonesty and malignant narcissism. He and his MAGA sycophantic courtiers take credit for something they had no part in.




Wednesday, August 19, 2026

GUEST POST BY DAVE MILLER

 Count me as stunned.

I survived the debacle of the Vietnam War. I celebrated when the United States liberated Kuwait and was disappointed when we failed to protect the Kurds from Iraqi helicopter attacks.

I was all in for attacking Taliban bases in Afghanistan after 9/11 but totally opposed to an all-out invasion of Iraq.

None of that prepared me for what the current POTUS is doing with Iran.

Simply put, President Trump is presiding over military success after military success while, at the same time, managing to lose the war he started against a country his administration repeatedly told us had been militarily devastated.

And that's what makes all this so stunning.

Because military success is not the same thing as winning a war.

Last year, President Trump claimed Iran's nuclear capability had been totally “obliterated.” This year he claimed Iran's military had been decimated. He repeatedly told us the Iranians desperately wanted a deal with the United States.

Yet the war rages on.

At the outset of the conflict, Trump and his administration outlined sweeping objectives:

Eliminate Iran's missile threat.

Eliminate its nuclear threat.

Destroy its ability to project military power.

End the threat from its regional proxies.

Regime change in Iran


Then Trump added one more.

On March 6, he declared there would be no deal with Iran except:

“UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER.”

Iran's military has certainly been battered. Its leadership has been hit. Ships, missile launchers, military installations and infrastructure have been destroyed.

Those are significant military accomplishments.

But destroying targets is not the same thing as achieving the objectives of a war.

I'm reminded of an exchange U.S. Army Col. Harry Summers said he had with a North Vietnamese colonel in Hanoi at the end of the Vietnam War.

“You know you never defeated us on the battlefield,” Summers told him. The North Vietnamese officer replied:

“That may be so, but it is also irrelevant.”

That's a lesson we seem to have forgotten.

You can win battles and still lose a war.

And by the objectives President Trump himself established for this war:

Not one has been achieved.

Not one.

Iran still has missiles.

The nuclear question remains unresolved.

The Islamic Republic is still in power.

Iran still possesses the ability to destabilize the region.


And most remarkably, five months after President Trump demanded Iran's unconditional surrender, Iran has presented demands of its own to the United States.

Think about that for a moment.

Iran has demanded an end to American military operations, sanctions relief, compensation for war damages, the release of frozen assets, American withdrawal from the region and other concessions as part of negotiations over reopening the Strait of Hormuz.

I can hear the echoes of conservative commentators had this happened during a Biden or Obama administration.

“How dare they,” we'd hear.

“We're the United States, the greatest military power on the planet.”

“No one dictates terms to America.”

But here we are.

And there is something even more troubling.

By absorbing some of the best shots the United States can deliver and remaining on its feet, it can be argued that Iran's stature in parts of the world has increased.

For decades, Iranian leaders have called America the “Great Satan” while portraying us as a paper tiger… an enormously powerful nation that ultimately lacks the ability to translate overwhelming military power into political results.

We should be deeply concerned when our own actions begin helping our enemies make their case.

Take a moment and let that sink in.

This isn't the presidency of Bill Clinton, Barack Obama or Joe Biden.

This is Donald Trump.

A Republican.

A Make America Great Again guy.

An America First guy.

A president whose entire foreign-policy persona has been built around strength, winning and the idea that other nations would once again fear American power.

Yet the nation he demanded unconditionally surrender is still fighting, still standing and has now presented conditions to us.

And that brings me to what really worries me.

History gives us some frightening examples of what can happen when leaders realize they are losing control.

By March 1945, Adolf Hitler knew Germany was facing catastrophe. Allied armies were advancing from the west while Soviet forces closed in from the east.

His response?

The Nero Decree.

Hitler ordered Germany's transportation systems, communications networks, industrial facilities and infrastructure destroyed rather than allow them to fall intact into Allied hands.

Think about that.

Tuesday, August 18, 2026

Trump Renews His Bromance With The North Korean Communist Dictator

 


Read Trump's social media post below.

This would have been unbelievable in normal times with a functioning Executive Branch - a US president openly criticizing our longtime South Korean allies while appearing to want to appease North Korea's dictator leader, Kim Jong Un. 

Trump states that the military exercises with South Korea are disrespectful to Kim, who is an adversary of the US and all of our allies and who is aligned with Putin against Ukraine, supplying Russia arms and troops to help him wage war on another US ally. This is directly counter to US and allied interests, and is a baffling, dangerous move away from a balance of power and world order that has maintained a regional peace that the superpower nations have mostly adhered to. 

Trump appears to, once again, be out of his depth, rashly toying with alliances that he clearly either misunderstands or is willing to trash, because South Korea, like most of the rest of the world and all of our traditional allies, refused to get involved in Trump's ill-planned failure of a war in Iran, -- a war that threatens to cripple the world's financial and energy markets for years to come. 

Do any of Trump's rational, seasoned advisors know that this is beyond being dangerous and disloyal, and edging toward something worse? Trump is once again showing America and the world how utterly unequipped he is for the presidency, and how the new world order he's trying to effect is bad for the US, in the short and long run. 










Sunday, August 16, 2026

YOUR SUNDAY MOMENT OF ZEN

 



“No one saves us but ourselves. No one can and no one may. We ourselves must walk the path.” ― Gautama Buddha, Sayings of Buddha

Thursday, August 13, 2026

Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trump's Personal Lawyer.

 

Todd Blanche is now the Attorney General of the United States. He was Trump's personal defense lawyer who defended Trump in multiple criminal indictments, including the New York "hush money" trial, and he acted as his trusted personal counsel through various state and federal legal challenges.

It is highly unusual in modern U.S. history for a president to appoint his personal defense lawyer to serve as Attorney General. While presidents historically appointed close political allies or campaign managers, modern legal norms demand strict institutional separation between the President’s personal legal troubles and the Department of Justice (DOJ).

Blanche's appointment is a blatant conflict of interest. The Attorney General represents the United States and the American people, not the president as an individual. Can Trump's former personal defense lawyer face intense scrutiny over whether he can objectively oversee federal law enforcement, or if he will act as the president's private counsel?

For your information, here is a list of Trump attorneys who at one time worked for him and what happened to them as a result. Blanche is NOT in good company:




* Roy Cohn — Disbarred; dead

* Michael Cohen — Disbarred; pleaded guilty to tax, campaign and false-statement crimes

* Rudy Giuliani — Disbarred in NY and DC; $148M in defamation damages

* Alina Habba — Sanctioned $1M for frivolous litigation. 

* Boris Epshteyn — Pending AZ criminal charges  in fake-elector case.

* John Eastman — Disbarred in CA and suspended in DC; AZ criminal case pending.

* Kenneth Chesebro — Disbarred in NY; pleaded guilty in GA; WI case pending

* Sidney Powell — Pleaded guilty in GA.

* Jenna Ellis — Pleaded guilty in GA; suspended in CO; AZ criminal case pending.

* Jeffrey Clark — Facing criminal charges in AZ over fake-elector scheme.

* Christina Bobb — Facing AZ criminal charges over fake-elector scheme.


Total number of criminal convictions or disbarments among all of Ronald Reagan’s, George H. W. Bush’s, Bill Clinton’s, George W. Bush’s, Barack Obama’s, and Joe Biden’s lawyers:


0


Total number of criminal convictions or disbarments among Donald Trump’s lawyers:


Nine and counting

Monday, August 10, 2026

GUEST POST BY DAVE MILLER

 

Make it stop.


In early July, after the new DC Reflecting Pool paint started peeling, Dept of Interior Secretary Burgum stated the US had evidence of wrongdoing and that “acts of vandalism” were caught on camera.


US Atty Jeanne Pirro presented “evidence” and got an indictment of former US Olympian David Hearn for that vandalism from a DC Grand Jury.


President Trump stated “We have photographs, or tapes…” In addition, he said in June  “We also have pictures… ”. When he was pressed to show those images, he said they would come out in time. “At the right time you’ll see it,” he said. “You’ll see it in court.”


But then reality set in.


US Atty Pirro, after getting the indictment against Hearn actually sat down to look at the evidence and realized something… there was no evidence. No photos, no tapes, no nothing. She had stepped up to do the president’s bidding and was caught holding the bag.


Even as she dropped the case, Trump essentially ripped her a new one in stating "I disagree 100% with Jeanine Pirro on the Reflecting Pool.” He then went on to add the following…


"Frankly, I think she choked, because the judge was really vicious.” And that he said she "folded like a cheap umbrella”.


Yesterday he had this to say after admitting there was “contractor error” on the job…


“…there is no video or proof, other than the damage, itself,”, essentially exonerating Hearn and Pirro.


None of the above is in dispute. It’s all part of the public record and included in court filings and POTUS Trump’s own Truth Social postings.


Conclusions… I’ll admit, I don’t want to be charitable to the POTUS. I’m fed up with Trump, his lies, his profiteering off the office of the presidency, and his petty narcissism.


But I’m willing to say that it is possible no one in the Oval Office orbit was actually aware of the truth. Perhaps in a rush to satisfy the demands of the president, Burgum and Pirro just went along with what Trump wanted, hoping some real evidence would later turn up.


Because the only alternative is that all three of them knew early on that the president had gotten out over his skis, and it was their job to protect him… even if it meant lying to the American people.


What say you?



Saturday, August 8, 2026

SATURDAY NIGHT DANCING

Baryshnikov:   Nureyev:   Osiel Gouneo:

Friday, August 7, 2026

Trump bank accounts were closed due to concerns over possible money laundering, Capital One says

 


What did MAGA expect when they voted to put a convicted criminal back in office? Integrity? Honor? Virtue? Those are words no one would ever associate with Donald Trump.






 NEW YORK (AP) "Bank accounts held by President Donald Trump were closed by Capital One in 2021 after it flagged financial activity that had characteristics of money laundering, the bank disclosed in a court filing over the weekend. The court filing is tied to a lawsuit filed against Capital One by one of Trump's financial holding companies shortly after he was sworn into office a second time. Trump alleges that Capital One illegally closed his accounts for political reasons, following the Jan. 6 attacks on the U.S. Capitol. Capital One wants the lawsuit dismissed."

 [skip] 

"Trump had more than 300 bank accounts with Capital One before they were closed. The bank accounts were for a variety of Trump-branded businesses, ranging from a golf course to a winery. Trump had banked with Capital One for more than a decade before the accounts were closed. In the court filing, Capital One said it had no reason to make a political statement with the closure of Trump's accounts in 2021 and the move had everything to do with activity in the accounts being flagged by anti-money laundering experts with the bank." 




 AI Overview  

Capital One disclosed in a federal court filing that it closed hundreds of bank accounts linked to the Trump Organization in 2021 following an internal anti-money laundering review.  The filing is part of a legal defense to dismiss a lawsuit from Donald Trump and his business entities alleging politically motivated "debanking".


  • The Closures: Following the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, Capital One conducted reviews and moved to shut down over 300 accounts tied to the Trump Organization. [1, 2]
  • The Allegations: Trump, his trust, and Eric Trump filed a lawsuit arguing the closures were an unlawful, politically motivated effort to distance the bank from his conservative views. [1, 2]
  • The Defense: Capital One asked a federal court in Florida to dismiss the amended lawsuit, stating the closures stemmed from standard compliance and risk assessments rather than political retaliation.

  • Summary

    While regulatory bodies like FinCEN previously fined Trump casino properties for anti-money laundering compliance failures, and financial institutions like Capital One closed accounts based on automated or internal AML risk indicators, there are no criminal convictions or formal legal charges of money laundering against the Trump Organization itself. Proven criminal charges against the organization to date focus on tax fraud, falsification of records, and asset misvaluation rather than money laundering.




  •  "The closures were the result of months of analysis and a careful review by Capital One's AML team in accordance with bank policies and regulatory guidance," lawyers for the bank said in a court filing on July 31. "Capital One never publicized the termination decision nor its confidential internal process giving rise to the closure, and it permitted Plaintiffs several months (and granted several extensions) to find new banking services, which they did."

    Wednesday, August 5, 2026

    Once again, Trump commits a travesty against those who served and serve.






    There are boundaries of respect that should never be crossed, yet Donald Trump has managed to obliterate them once again. By sharing a surreal, AI-generated image of himself decked out in fictional military medals—standing shoulder-to-shoulder with genuine historical commanders like Generals Patton and MacArthur—he has displayed a staggering level of disrespect. 

    For someone who avoided military service through multiple deferments, wrapping oneself in the unearned cloth of a highly decorated general is not just pathetic; it is a profound insult to every person who ever wore the uniform. 

    While others were drafted, fought, and died, he used five draft deferments during the Vietnam War, making the visual of him in a dress uniform deeply hypocritical. 

    This is stolen valor at its worst by Trump who, according to General John Kelly who served as his Chief of Staff in the first Trump administration, called those who were wounded and gave the last full measure for our country, "suckers and losers."  

    Trump is too stupid to understand that medals and military insignia are earned through blood, sweat, and profound personal sacrifice—not manufactured by a computer to feed an ego. Trump has cheapened the ultimate sacrifice for a fleeting political stunt -- an act of pure ego that turns the stomach of anyone who respects the military."

    Those who still support Trump should look within themselves to finally understand what is missing in their humanity that allows them to continue their allegiance to this unworthy, failed human being. IMO, they're as broken and damaged as Trump is.

     




    Donald Trump shared an AI-generated image on Truth Social depicting himself as a heavily decorated military general standing alongside historical Generals George S. Patton and Douglas MacArthur. [1]
    Details of the Post
    • The Image: A surreal, AI-created graphic showing Trump in a military uniform with numerous medals and insignia alongside Gens. Patton and MacArthur. [1, 2, 3]
    • The Reaction: Online critics and service members quickly pointed out that Trump never served in the military, leading to accusations of "stolen valor" for portraying himself with higher ranks and more decorations than the historical commanders. [1, 2, 3]