Trump: "We're taking in trillions, not billions, trillions and trillions of dollars from other countries … Now they're paying a lot of money and they're paying hundreds of billions of dollars… But I think there's also a possibility that we're taking in so much money that we may very well make a dividend to the people of America."
"No. Trump's claims of trillions in tariff revenue are exaggerated; actual US collections are in the tens of billions annually, paid by importers, not foreign governments directly. No individual country pays hundreds of billions. A public dividend remains a speculative proposal, not reality."
Source: US Treasury, Tax Foundation.
We, the consumers, are paying for Trump's tariffs.
"When the U.S. imposes tariffs, such as those implemented by the Trump administration, it's typically the importer of the goods (often an American company) who directly pays the tariff to the U.S. Treasury.
However, the economic burden of these tariffs can be distributed in various ways:
U.S. businesses: Importers may choose to absorb some or all of the tariff cost, impacting their profits.
Foreign businesses: Foreign exporters might lower their prices to offset the tariff and maintain competitiveness in the U.S. market.
U.S. consumers: Importers may pass on the increased cost of tariffs to consumers through higher prices for goods.
While President Trump has often stated that tariffs are paid by foreign countries, economists generally agree that the costs are largely borne by businesses and consumers within the country imposing the tariffs.
Recent studies on the Trump administration's tariffs suggest that the burden has fallen almost entirely on U.S. firms or final consumers."
****************************
Broader Economic Impacts
- Inflationary Pressures: Economists at Yale's Budget Lab calculate that the tariffs will have an inflationary effect, costing the typical household an average of up to $2,400 this year.
- Potential for Slower Economic Growth: The tariffs are seen as a potential drag on overall economic growth, with some forecasts predicting a long-term reduction in US GDP.
- Impact on Employment: Reports indicate that hiring has stalled and job losses have occurred in some sectors, though the overall employment impact is complex and still unfolding.
7 comments:
The "very stable genius" at work. Again proving he hasn't a clue as to what he is doing.
The tariff was a congressional responsibility until now. Hoover's 'Smoot-Hawley' tariffs set the stage for the great depression as shown in Britannica -
"Smoot-Hawley contributed to the early loss of confidence on Wall Street and signaled U.S. isolationism. By raising the average tariff by some 20 percent, it also prompted retaliation from foreign governments, and many overseas banks began to fail. (Because the legislation set both specific and ad valorem tariff rates [i.e., rates based on the value of the product], determining the precise percentage increase in tariff levels is difficult and a subject of debate among economists.) Within two years some two dozen countries adopted similar “beggar-thy-neighbour” duties, making worse an already beleaguered world economy and reducing global trade. U.S. imports from and exports to Europe fell by some two-thirds between 1929 and 1932, while overall global trade declined by similar levels in the four years that the legislation was in effect." As economic policy it is as stupid as 'trickle down' and be paid for by the working stiffs. With his penchant for re-writing history,
we we no doubt be informed that 'Sleepy Joe Bden' did it. *yawn*
If it's only several hundred billion we should just skip the tariff idea and let the companies keep the money. Of course countries will still collect tariffs on US goods as they have always done but we will be thought as a compassionate country. After all the is what beachchair joe did and he was satisfied with double digit inflation so we should be good to go.
skud, are you stealing my stuff?
"we will no doubt be informed that 'Sleepy Joe Biden' did it. *yawn*" ?
You ought to be doing standup! :) "Hey Ladies and Gents. Hoover's Great Depression was was Biden's fault"?
"Hoover's Great Depression was was Biden's fault"
I will admit I didn't know this but not surprised.
With "satisfied with double digit inflation", Skud LIES again. Big surprise.
Skud is satisfied with tax cuts for the rich, presidential immunity, a weaponized DOJ, denying food and healthcare for the poor, ending vaccinations, ending due process, gulags for non-violent offenders, secret police gangs, militarized law enforcement, and defending Trump's failure to lower inflation.
Inflation:
Biden November 2024 - 2.7
Trump June 2025 - 2.7
https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/current-inflation-rates/
Not a peep of objection from ol' Skud. Everything bad is Biden's fault, of course.
BB... I'll address this to you, because some of the luddites won't get it. A few years back, TSMC, a Taiwanese Microchip company started, with help from the Biden Admin Chips Act, construction on the most advanced microchip act ever built in the US. The total project has taken over 5 years.
5 Years.
Now Apple has announced plans to build a factory here in the US too. Obviously to avoid, or lower tariffs from their current chips, being produced in China.
But in the meantime, the tariff lovers among us, seem to not be able to comprehend that prices will inevitably rise and US consumers will pay more from the inflationary effects.
Then once those US chips come online, prices of course will stay at the same high, or even higher cost, costing US consumers even more.
You're my Grok amigo. Am I missing something? How is this scenario, all Trump caused, good for America?
Post a Comment