Paul Revere by Cyrus Dallin, North End, Boston

Saturday, November 15, 2025

This is what evil and misogny look like: A MALE BLAMING FEMALE CHILD RAPE VICTIMS FOR WHAT WAS DONE TO THEM

 


Shaw Kenawe

We don’t know that.

But the Epstein emails show Epstein himself stating that Trump was alone with one of the girls for hours in Epstein’s mansion. Also, we have evidence that Trump and Epstein celebrated “ their secret”. Don’t you wonder what secret they shared?

Beyond all that, though, what the Epstein scandal shows is that very wealthy very powerful men were engaged with Epstein in raping children. Doesn’t that turn your stomach?

FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
Trump and Epstein's secret? That under hypergamy, the rich can grab any woman by the p*ssy, and she will love him for it. Cuz that's how she can draft on his wealth and social position.

All those underage girls hanging out with Jeff & Ghislaine? They were all playing the hypergamy game. Only when the sun came up and the "Prince" hadn't put the slipper on their feet, they blamed Ghislaine, when they should have simply looked in the mirror to see whom they should blame.
November 15, 2025 at 9:27 AM

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
Turn my stomach? There are only 13 US States (& Virgin Islands) where the age of consent is 18. In my state, Maryland, its' 16.

They weren't raping children.. The children all appeared to be consenting... or they would have all reported it immediately to the authorities rather than keep playing the hypergamy game.
November 15, 2025 at 9:35 AM
-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
btw - Why was Trump responsible for spilling the beans on Epstein's hypergamy game? Every woman on the planet was playing it.
November 15, 2025 at 9:40 AM
-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
Trump was merely practicing hypogamy (the opposite game).




New records detail how Epstein levereged connections to the wealthy, powerful to abuse girls Nation Jan 5, 2024 12:06 PM EST


***********************



In a 2016 deposition, Joseph Recarey, a police detective in Palm Beach, Florida, said that approximately 30 women had spoken to him about "performing massage and work at Epstein's home" in the beachfront community.


He said Maxwell was involved in recruiting the girls.


Mr Recarey testified that only two of the girls had any massage experience and the majority of them were under the age of 18.


When asked how Epstein was able to gain access to so many underage girls the detective said: "Each of the victims that went to the home were asked to bring their friends to the home."

Some were paid to recruit, he said, adding: "When they went to perform a massage, it was for [Epstein's] sexual gratification."



                ***********************


According to people like -FJ, those wily underage girls were practicing "hypergamy," in order to trick Epstein and Maxwell into giving them a financially better life. 

Poor Epstein and Maxwell and Trump! All victims of underage girls practicing what all females practice: The age-old deceptive craft of hypergamy! 




-FJ: "Trump and Epstein's secret? That under hypergamy, the rich can grab any woman by the p*ssy, and she will love him for it. Cuz that's how she can draft on his wealth and social position."

T


NOTE:  Most of the victims in the Epstein scandals were NOT "women," they were underage girls.

MORE EVIDENCE OF TRUMP'S DETERIORATING MIND.

 

The Epstein files/emails are a hoax ONLY when they implicate Donnie. 

Trump has directed his personal lawyer and lackey, Bondi, to open an investigation into the hoax -- but only where Democrats are implicated.

See how that works?





Friday, November 14, 2025

Who's surprised?

 

Trump says he will ask DOJ to investigate Democrats, business leaders with ties to Epstein 



Classic "wag the dog" by an obviously frightened little man who has been exposed as a friend of child sexual predators/pedophiles and who gave preferential treatment to them.

Has anyone thought to ask Epstein's bestie, Trump, why Ghislaine Maxwell is getting preferential treatment in a "club fed" facility, when this has never happened in the case of any other person who sex trafficked children and engaged in sexual acts with those children?


*********************


"Bureau of Prisons spokesperson Donald Murphy told CNN “We can confirm, Ghislaine Maxwell is in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) at the Federal Prison Camp (FPC) Bryan in Bryan, Texas.” 

Maxwell’s transfer comes after her lawyer met met with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche for a private meeting in Tallahassee. 

A statement has been released by the families of Epstein and Maxwell’s survivors slamming the president’s treatment of the situation. It reads: President Trump has sent a clear message:

Pedophiles deserve preferential treatment and their victims do not matter. We, the undersigned, are the family of Virginia Roberts Giuffre and survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. It is with horror and outrage that we object to the preferential treatment convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell has received. 

Ghislaine Maxwell is a sexual predator who physically assaulted minor children on multiple occasions, and she should never be shown any leniency. Yet, without any notification to the Maxwell victims, the government  has moved Maxwell to a minimum security luxury prison in Texas. This is the justice system failing victims right before our eyes. 

The American public should be enraged by the preferential treatment being given to a pedophile and a criminally charged child sex offender. 

The Trump administration should not credit a word Maxwell says, as the government itself sought charges against Maxwell for being a serial liar. This move smacks of a cover up. The victims deserve better. Signed: Annie Farmer Maria Farmer Sky and Amanda Roberts (family of Virginia Roberts Giuffre) Lanette and Danny Wilson (family of Virginia Roberts Giuffre)."



Ghislaine Maxwell's prison emails show she is 'happier' at minimum-security Texas facility 

 "Maxwell, a convicted sex offender connected to Jeffrey Epstein, was moved to a less restrictive federal prison this summer. Congress is investigating allegations of special treatment."





Who's surprised that Donald Trump would have his administration make sure that the lowest of low-life criminals -- child traffickers and sexual assaulters -- would get treatment in a facility that made them so happy.

Because in Trump's world, making pedophiles "happier" is how you ensure that they'll keep their rotten mouths shut.

Wednesday, November 12, 2025

Epstein email implicating Trump with an underage victim released on Wednesday


The discussion on the ACA is still ongoing. Thank you to Dave Miller and commenters for participating in the exchange of ideas.


I've interrupted it this afternoon because this is being reported everywhere because of the damning information included in the reports.


We do know from ample evidence that Trump and Melania partied with Epstein and Maxwell for decades. It is not a stretch to believe that both of them, but especially Trump, knew what was going on in Epstein's mansions in New York and Palm Beach. Trump and Epstein were, after all, very close friends. 


The emails in the NPR report linked below confirm what everyone suspected:  It appears that Trump was part of the criminal activity that Epstein and Maxwell were involved in with underage girls.


Read the article and decide for yourselves.


New Epstein emails appear to reveal more Trump ties 

November 12, 20258:30 AM ET



"Another email Epstein sent in 2011 to Ghislane Maxwell, his associate who was also convicted on trafficking charges, called Trump the "dog that hasn't barked"* and says Trump spent "hours at my house" with one of the alleged sex trafficking victims. 

 The last email shared is a 2019 message between Epstein and Wolff in which the disgraced financier wrote that 'of course [Trump] knew about the girls as he asked Ghislane to stop." The email does not elaborate any further.' "

*The phrase "a dog that hasn't barked" means that the absence of an expected action or evidence is itself a form of evidence. The concept originates from a Sherlock Holmes story where a dog's silence about an intruder reveals that the intruder was someone the dog knew. 

In modern usage, it can be a tool for critical thinking to identify what isn't obvious, such as finding hidden insights in data or understanding why a certain group or individual has remained silent on an issue.

GUEST POST BY DAVE MILLER

 May the ACA Rest in Peace

 

Obamacare is dead and congratulations are in order for the GOP.

 

Since the day the law, formally known as the Affordable Care Act, or ACA was passed in. 2010, conservatives have been doing everything they could to weaken it, kill it, end it and be done with it.

 

Even though a strong majority of Americans support it, use it to keep their medical costs down and stay healthy.

 

I know this personally.

 

In 2015, one year after full implementation of the ACA, I found myself literally doubled over in extreme pain walking into an emergency room in Las Vegas. As I sat there waiting to be treated, I wondered how much of my expenses what came to be known as Obamacare would cover.

 

At the end of my 11 days stay, one surgery and multiple procedures later, I got the answer, all of it. The coverage I had through the ACA paid all my doctor bills, my hospital bills, my follow up care, everything. And according to my doctors, those 11 days saved my life.

 

Not everything with the ACA is perfect. But one good thing it did was require insurance companies to cover people with preexisting conditions. It was a preexisting condition that kept my wife and I up nights, because that reality made all the regular channels of non-employer based insurance unaffordable to us, and millions of Americans.

 

That requirement, or mandate, along with forcing insurance companies to fund birth control, contraceptives, annual physicals and routine blood tests and screenings has saved lives, led to better health outcomes, dramatically lowered teen pregnancy rates and cut abortions, in some states, by over 15%.

 

But now it is dead, a victim of thousands of little cuts. All that’s left is to wait for the growing sepsis conservatives have sown in health care in America to finish its task.

 

It did not have to be.

 

The ACA, the signature legislation of the first term of President Obama had been a progressive dream for years. With a Democratic supermajority in the Senate, the Democrats could have simply written the legislation and rammed it through Congress. They chose not to do so.

 

Knowing real success would need buy-in from the other side of the aisle and a skeptical American people, the administration fanned out across Washington and the country to seek input and improvements in the projected plan.

 

In addition to over 60 bi-partisan official House discussions in chamber, there were also over 100 official Senate hearings held in Washington. Hundreds of amendments were offered with some becoming part of the new legislation. Members of Congress all across the country held  town halls to get the pulse and opinion of people before the legislation was enacted.

 

In short, the process was public, done with regular order, negotiated between parties with substantial input from stakeholders. Additionally, amendments were offered and considered, all before the law was passed.

 

And then the empire struck back. Almost immediately conservatives began looking for ways to eliminate the ACA. In fact, the GOP plan was to kill it before it took effect and Americans came to like, rely on it and see that worked. All of which has come to be true in the last ten years.

 

Conservatives, however, have now voted more than 70 times to partially or fully repeal the ACA. President Trump has repeatedly lied, telling America his plan is “coming in two weeks”, “a few weeks”, “next week” and a “few days .” House Speaker Johnson has repeatedly lied saying the GOP has “a lot of” health care plans.

 

None of that is true. Instead, the conservatives of the GOP, egged on by their partisan supporters, have been working for 15 years to weaken the ACA to such a point that it no longer works, and then claim its inability to function requires it to be eliminated.

 

And their plan, despite a majority of Americans approving of the ACA, has worked like a charm.

 

Contrast the conservative approach with how progressives worked alongside President Bush to improve Medicare to cover prescriptions for medicines during his term. When that program needed improving, the Dems worked with the President to make sure it happened.

 

We saw no effort from conservatives to work to improve the ACA, with the single exception being Senator John McCain who refused to end the program during the first Trump term.

 

The simple truth is this:

 

Conservatives have for years, dating back to at least Senator Robert Taft’s run for the GOP nomination in the 1940s and '50s have railed against progressive legislation. Taft would feel right at home in today’s GOP as he stridently supported limited government and non-interventionist foreign policy.

 

Taft, while initially supporting Social Security and other programs during the Great Depression, came to believe those programs encouraged dependence on the federal government.

 

Then in the 1960s, conservatives used the same language to oppose Medicare, which President Johnson signed into law in 1965. Today conservatives see these entitlement programs that have helped lift millions of Americans out of poverty, and help them be healthy in retirement, as robbing people of their freedoms.

 

Finally, we come to what may be the real reason the Trump Administration has set its sights on the elimination of the popular ACA. It’s not because it’s imperfect, doesn’t work or doesn’t meet the needs of the American people. It’s not because the administration believes government should not be involved in private industry.

 

Not at all. The real reason the Trump Administration wants the ACA repealed is because it has become known as Obamacare, and our president is a petty, jealous man. How do we know the man who had to be shielded from seeing the name John McCain on a United States Navy aircraft carrier does not like the name Obamacare?

 

Because over the last few days he’s been posting and sharing his belief a new plan should be called “Trumpcare”.

 

All of this brings us to today.

 

Earlier this year, conservatives passed a budget in the House to eliminate millions of dollars of subsidies for the ACA. They knew doing so without a plan to cover low income people would lead to havoc and families losing their healthcare, but they did so anyway.

 

Angry over this, progressives initially refused to go along, and our government was shut down. Ultimately though, we all knew where this was headed. The progressive Dems simply did not have the cards or the votes to win this fight.

 

This week a handful of Dems gave up the fight.

 

It was not worth it they said, to crash the entire air traffic system the Trump Administration was shutting down. It was not worth it they said to continue to try and force the Trump Administration to abide by a SCOTUS ruling and provide millions of Americans the help they needed to put food on their tables. It was not worth it, they said, to continue to expect government workers, except Congress, to go without pay.

 

It was not worth it, but it is what cnservatives were willing to do to America so people could be free, finally they will say, of the ACA and so President Trump does not have to say “Obamacare”.

 

Now that the shutdown is over, we can get back to business. The House must now, unless Speaker Johnson has another exception, officially swear in and seat Representative-elect Grijalva of Arizona. That will force a vote Johnson does not want, to release the Epstein files.

 

Then, in short order I am sure, we can finally see the plan Speaker Johnson said could only be put forward and revealed once the ACA subsidies were ended. The time is now here for the Speaker and conservatives to show their hand.

 

Unless, as Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene says, that plan does not exist.

 

In which case, millions of Americans are now needlessly screwed, but free.

Tuesday, November 11, 2025

Agree? Or no?





 

****************************


The Most Corrupt POTUS in America's History:  Trump.










Sunday, November 9, 2025

YOUR SUNDAY MOMENT OF ZEN

 



“Train your eyes and ears; train your nose and tongue. The senses are good friends when they are trained. Train your body in deeds, train your tongue in words, train your mind in thoughts. This training will take you beyond sorrow.”

– Buddha

Saturday, November 8, 2025

Friday, November 7, 2025

Funny, isn't it? Or is it?

 

Timothy McVeigh planned and committed one of America's most horrific domestic terrorist attacks on the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, killing 160 men, women, and children. 

Timothy McVeigh belonged to a extremist Christian sect.  His actions and affiliations were linked to the extremist Christian Identity movement, which is a racist and anti-Semitic belief system. His connections included the importance of the date of the Oklahoma City bombing (April 19) to the movement, his association with the Christian Identity compound Elohim City, and his admiration for The Turner Diaries, a book revered by Christian Identity adherents.


*********************


This was posted and admired over at the Mother Ship today:








No American that I know blames all Christians for the Oklahoma City bombing. Do you know of any individual or group of Americans that hold Christians responsible for that terrible, terrible day?

Yet the woman who runs the Mother Ship proudly posted this, and probably thought it was funny because it implicated the newly elected mayor of New York City, Zorhan Mamdani, as a Muslim terrorist who killed 3,000 Americans on 9/11.

Mr. Mamdani was 10 years old on 9/11.

The people who publish trash like the above meme are what drags America into the gutter.


THIS PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS

 
Trump’s complete lack of human compassion was on full display when Gordon Findlay, a Novo Nordisk executive, fainted right behind him during the Oval Office press conference on weight loss drug prices.  

As Findlay collapsed, Trump looked visibly annoyed and made no effort to help, letting others rush to the man’s aid while he stood back and waited for the cameras to turn back to him. 

Medical staff acted quickly, and Findlay is expected to recover, but the White House has not revealed further details about his condition.​ 

The picture below was taken by photographer Andrew Harnik of Getty images and will probably go down in history as the perfect symbol of what a self centered, callous man Trump is. 

Instead of showing any real concern, Trump appeared irritated about the disruption and was eager to get back to his event, emphasizing how much the interruption inconvenienced him.

 




If you had a demented loved one, you'd recognize this behavior. Alzheimer's a disease that progresses to different levels. Some good days, some bad days. Earlier Trump was slumped and appeared to be asleep in his chair.  His staff are covering for him far worse than Reagan's and Biden's people covered for them. 

Wednesday, November 5, 2025

Democrats sweep Tuesday's elections.

 


IMO and the opinion of others who understand the political implications of elections, Tuesday night was a resounding rebuke of Trump and the GOP:


From Heather Cox Richardson:

"...legal scholar John Pfaff wrote: 'Every race. It’s basically been every race. Governors. Mayors. Long-held [Republican] dog-catchers. School boards. Water boards. Flipped a dungeon master in a rural Iowa D&D club. State senators. State reps. A janitor in Duluth. State justices. Three [Republican] Uber drivers. Just everything.' 

Trump posted on social media: 'TRUMP WASN’T ON THE BALLOT, AND SHUTDOWN, WERE THE TWO REASONS THAT REPUBLICANS LOST ELECTIONS TONIGHT,’ according to Pollsters. 

But in fact, voters resoundingly rejected Trump and Trumpism, and today, politics will be a whole different game."


*************************



Trump, throwing his usual toddler hissy fit, warned Mamdani, New York's new mayor, that he would withhold federal funding from the city because the New Yorkers' choice for mayor, and not Trump's, won!

That's a first in my lifetime. Never have I heard a POTUS threaten a major city with withholding federal funds because that city freely and fairly voted for the candidate of their choice.

But, as we've said before, Trump doesn't believe in American norms, the rule of law, or our Constitution. What he does believe in is unrestrained power and retribution against anyone who doesn't bend a knee to his authoritarian rule.

All across America last night, Americans told him an emphatic, decisive, conclusive, deafening, "NO WE WON'T!"


Tuesday, November 4, 2025

The Vulgarity of Trump and his Administration:

 

This was part of the entertainment at Trump's "Great Gatsby" Halloween Party at Mar-a-Largo, while millions of Americans wondered if they would be able to put food on their tables.





"They were careless people, Tom and Daisy — they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness or whatever it was that held them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made…" F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Great Gatsby.



Photo of Trump at Mar-a-Largo after being told of the millions of Americans who will lose access to food because of his government shutdown.

Monday, November 3, 2025

GUEST POST BY DAVE MILLER

 The White House Ballroom Project

 

How President Trump missed a gimme, blew a slam dunk and is wasting America’s time…

 

In golf, it’s called a gimme, a can’t miss putt. In basketball, the can’t miss shot is the slam dunk. In White House politics, a ballroom for visiting dignitaries certainly qualifies. But President Trump misread the green and somehow hit the rim on his slam dunk. Once again embroiling America in yet another unnecessary political “us vs them” moment.

 

Clearly the White House and President Trump have been all over the map on the Trump Ballroom project. Normally a project this size gets designed and drawn by architects before demolition. Then it is submitted to review for structural compliance and safety. Then permits are issued and only them can the project begin.

 

None of that happened in this case do to a confluence of loopholes in the federal system. As such, a president, using private funding, has 100% full authority to manage and direct the project as he or she sees fit.

 

That said, this is not Donald J Trump’s house. It is the people’s house, owned in common by all citizen’s of the country.

 

Throughout the process, President Trump has at best been defensive about questions and opaque with details. At worst, the President was lying when he spoke of the cost, size and scope of the ballroom project.

 

To date we have not been presented with any actual plans, finished architectural drawings, structural analysis or explanations as to why the East Wing, despite the president’s promises was demolished, along with the Jacqueline Kennedy Rose Garden. It’s basically been, from an administration low on the truth meter, “Trust us!”

 

I don’t have a problem with modifications to the White House. In fact the Obama Administration oversaw a Congressionally approved and funded renovation of the heating, cooling and electrical systems along with other needed interior improvements and a tennis court. That is how the White House has been modified for generations. In fact, at one point President Truman wanted to enlarge the Oval Office and Congress said no. He did not proceed, although his administration did add what became known as the Truman balcony and make a series of other needed improvements.

 

President Trump is correct, the White House needs a larger banquet area. Tents and portable potties are not acceptable for a State Dinner. I’m also sure he decided to do it as he wanted because as Ezra Klein and the Abundance crowd has noted, nothing gets built quickly anymore in the US. The regulations simply won’t permit it, and I’m sure Trump wants to be the first to hold a State Dinner in the new ballroom.

 

But he should have worked with the Washington DC Commission of Fine Arts and the other DC architectural review boards to ensure the project fit the overall sense of the Capitol area. Instead of firing them, only to be replaced with hand picked loyalists. A more democratic and open planning process would have ensured a better project, supported by a majority of Americans.

 

Sadly, that is not the case now.

 

 

Timeline of the Trump Ballroom Project

 

July 2025

 

•   President Trump announces a plan to build a 90,000 square foot ballroom to seat 650 people at cost of $250 million on the White House grounds. It was scheduled to begin in September 2025 and be done before Trump leaves office in January 2029.

•   On July 31, the White House announced its plans for constructing the ballroom. While promoting the project at the White House, Trump said the ballroom "won't interfere with the current building. … It will be near it but not touching it. It pays total respect to the existing building, which I’m the biggest fan of. It’s my favorite place. I love it.”

•   President Trump announces construction of the $250 million ballroom will be privately funded.

 

August 2025

 

•   McCrery Architects, a Washington-based firm recognized for its work in classical architecture, has been appointed as lead architect on the new ballroom. You can see from the renderings that the ballroom was to be attached to the East Wing, as Trump stated in July, 2025.

 

October 2025

 

•   A list of donors to the ballroom project were released. Many have business pending with the US Government. Additionally, the cost has now grown to $300 million.

•   After stating the East Wing would “not be touched” during the construction of the new ballroom, the facade was demolished.

•   Trump orders the East Wing demolished in an F-word rant.

•   Announcing funding, the President also said the East Wing of the White House would be totally demolished. This was done without any public comment and after Trump publicly stated he would not do so.

•   Demolition workers say they are not allowed to talk about the demolition and have been forced to sign NDAs.

•   Federal workers were told to stop taking and sharing photos of the demolition.

•   The East Wing of the White House is totally demolished.

•   Trump calls criticism of his total demolition of the East Wing of the White House, which he stated would not be touched, “music to his ears” on Fox News.

•   Trump fires the entire membership of the Commission of Fine Arts, established by Congress in 1910. The commission is charged with giving expert advice to the president, Congress and other officials on design and preservation. 

Members of the Trump Administration have already started calling the new project the Donald J Trump Ballroom. Trump has called those reports 

Saturday, November 1, 2025

SATURDAY NIGHT MUSIC

 


I didn't think I could ever listen to anyone but Pavarotti sing the aria Nessun Dorma from Turandot after he passed away.

I was wrong.

This young man from Samoa, Pene Pati, is remarkable. What a voice!




Friday, October 31, 2025

NYTimes: Are We Losing Our Democracy? A Chilling Question.

 

For those who do not subscribe, I will post some of the points the editorial board makes (it's behind a paywall), and I hope this will encourage discussion.

What do you think?




"NO. 1 



Countries that slide from democracy toward autocracy tend to follow similar patterns. To measure what is happening in the United States, the Times editorial board has compiled a list of 12 markers of democratic erosion, with help from scholars who have studied this phenomenon. The sobering reality is that the United States has regressed, to different degrees, on all 12. 

Our country is still not close to being a true autocracy, in the mold of Russia or China. But once countries begin taking steps away from democracy, the march often continues. We offer these 12 markers as a warning of how much Americans have already lost and how much more we still could lose.



Authoritarian takeovers in the modern era often do not start with a military coup. They instead involve an elected leader who uses the powers of the office to consolidate authority and make political opposition more difficult, if not impossible. Think of Vladimir Putin in Russia, Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela and, to lesser degrees, Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Turkey, Viktor Orban in Hungary and Narendra Modi in India. These leaders have repressed dissent and speech in heavy-handed ways. 

Over the past year, President Trump and his allies have impinged on free speech to a degree that the federal government has not since perhaps the Red Scare of the 1940s and 1950s. His administration pressured television stations to stop airing Jimmy Kimmel’s talk show when Mr. Kimmel criticized Trump supporters after the murder of Charlie Kirk; revoked the visas of foreign students for their views on the war in Gaza; and ordered investigations of liberal nonprofit groups. Mr. Trump so harshly criticizes people who disagree with him, including federal judges, that they become targets of harassment from his supporters.


The Bottom Line 

 Many forms of speech and dissent remain vibrant in the United States. But the president has tried to dull them. His evident goal is to cause Americans to fear they will pay a price for criticizing him, his allies or his agenda."


*********************************

Personal note:  

I cancelled my Twitter/"X" account recently. I joined Twitter in 2013 under my real name, but didn't post anything there; I just read it. I began posting my opinions on Trump when Trump became president, and all through Biden's presidency up to Trump's election in 2024. Needless to say, my posts on Trump were not friendly.

After observing what he's done so far, I decided to delete my account completely. And some members of my family have suggested I do the same with this blog (they're worried), since it's not been friendly to Trump, EVER!

In all my time as an American citizen, I had NEVER entertained the idea that retribution or harm would ever come to me or anyone who dared to criticize a sitting president and his administration.

After what we've seen Trump do to dissent, I've had second thoughts.

We still have three long agonizing years to see what else this anti-democratic president and his administration will do to our freedom of speech.

I made a decision to continue posting at P.E., but what the future holds is anyone's guess while we have an unstable, mentally deteriorating person untethered from reality and the rule of law and in a position of enormous power.

 

Ex-Trump official on president’s SNAP concern: ‘He doesn’t give a s‑‑‑’








Thursday, October 30, 2025

Democrats, Republicans and Independents for Democracy

 

 :

Taken from DRAIFD's Facebook page:

Polls taken in October 2025 show something we’ve never really seen before in modern U.S. politics. Most Americans now say they don’t just dislike what Donald Trump is doing they believe he’s behaving like a “dangerous dictator.” And I have to believe that his unannounced, illegal, non-permitted, dark money funded destruction of the East Wing of the White House will only exacerbate these numbers.  

This is not activist language; it’s survey language. Multiple national polls put his job approval underwater: Quinnipiac reports that 54% of voters disapprove of the job he’s doing and only 40% approve, and Gallup has his approval at 41%, down from the mid-40s when his second term began in Jan. 2025. A CNN polling average puts his disapproval at 56%. Independent of job approval, PRRI finds 58% of Americans view him unfavorably and only 40% favorably. 

Voters aren’t just souring, they’re alarmed. In a national survey released Oct. 22, 2025, 56% of Americans agreed with the statement: “President Trump is a dangerous dictator whose power should be limited before he destroys American democracy.” That’s up from 52% earlier this year. Only 41% chose the alternative framing that he’s “a strong leader who should be given the power he needs to restore America’s greatness.” PRRI also notes that 45% “strongly agree” that he’s a dangerous dictator and 43% “strongly agree” he’s assaulting the rule of law. 

The divide is exactly where you’d expect it to be, and exactly where you should worry. Among Democrats, 91% say Trump is a dangerous dictator. Among independents, which is the bellwether for 2026 and for the multiple state elections that are occurring next month, about two-thirds (roughly 65%) say the same. Among Republicans, 82% say he’s actually a strong leader who should be given more power, not less.  

Racial and religious lines are just as stark. Majorities of Black, Hispanic, and AAPI respondents agree he’s a dangerous dictator, while white voters are more split, with a narrow edge toward calling him a “strong leader.” 

PRRI tracks this ideology to Christian nationalism. Americans who identify with Christian nationalist ideals are far more likely to embrace Trump’s use of power and describe him as the kind of authoritarian  leader who should be allowed to push through his agenda, while people who reject Christian nationalism overwhelmingly describe him as a threat. 

What’s driving that language isn’t just vibes. Voters are watching what he’s actually doing in his second term:  Sweeping executive actions;  mass firings and restructurings inside the federal government; personal grift; tariff shocks; illegal crackdowns on immigration; encouraging violent ICE authority; arrest detainment of even American citizens; open talk of using presidential power to punish critics; and open defiance of institutional limits. 

Majorities now say he’s gone “too far” with executive power, with 54% of Americans saying Trump is actively attacking the constitutional balance of power and the rule of law.  

Even among voters who once leaned his way, words like “chaotic,” “scary,” and “dangerous” are starting to replace “disruptor” and “outsider,” and his approval on most issues, i.e., economy, foreign policy, trade, even his mass deportation push is underwater.

Yes, there are caveats. Some of these polls force a binary choice  “dangerous dictator” vs. “strong leader” which can exaggerate intensity.  I prefer poles with numerical values for example 1 to 5 with one being extreme and five being generous.  I feel that these polls over time give a far a better measure. But I don’t write the polls.  And of course, the story splits along party lines, because everything splits along party lines. 

But the fact that this framing has now moved from activist protest signs to mainstream polling language and that nearly half of Independents say, not just casually but strongly, that they believe the sitting president is a dangerous dictator who must be limited, should stop everyone in their tracks. 

That is not normal language for a healthy democracy. It’s the language a country uses when it already believes the brakes have failed.

I keep asking the question are we mad enough yet? And it appears we’re getting closer.

Wednesday, October 29, 2025

The Wall Street Journal goes after Trump on tariffs:



From Occupy Democrats: 


The right-wing Wall Street Journal stuns MAGA world with an absolutely scathing takedown of Donald Trump’s pathetic Reagan tantrum.

Donald Trump just got publicly roasted by one of his own old allies — The Wall Street Journal, the influential financial newspaper owned by Rupert Murdoch.

In a scathing new editorial, the conservative paper accused Trump of acting like a “king” after he threw an all-caps meltdown over a Canadian TV ad quoting Ronald Reagan — of all people — warning against tariffs.

Ontario’s government ran a simple, fact-based ad showing Reagan saying what every sane economist knows: tariffs hurt Americans. But Trump couldn’t handle it.

He ranted that the ad was “AI or something,” accused Canada of “cheating,” and then — in a fit of rage — announced a 10% tariff hike on Canadian imports “because of their serious misrepresentation.”

Translation: A TV commercial hurt his feelings, so he’s taxing you.

The Editorial Board of the Journal didn’t mince words. It said Trump was “acting like a king,” abusing presidential power to lash out at critics, and flat-out lying about Reagan’s record. “Reagan knew tariffs are taxes,” the paper reminded readers, “while Mr. Trump pretends they are paid by foreigners.”

Let that sink in: The Wall Street Journal — the conservative mouthpiece of America’s financial fat cats itself — just called Trump an economic fraud and a wannabe monarch.

And they’re right. Trump’s trade wars have cost American farmers, manufacturers, and consumers billions, while he’s out here claiming Ronald Reagan was a tariff-loving socialist.

Reagan’s whole message was about free trade. Trump twisted it into an excuse for economic nationalism and political revenge.

Even the Gipper would be rolling in his grave as the Journal pointed out in its criticism of the Reagan Foundation’s cowardly capitulation to Trump. 

“It’s a shame to see the Reagan Foundation, of all places, indulging Mr. Trump’s pique with its statement saying the speech was taken out of context. Anyone who reads the whole speech can see the Gipper favored free trade, with rare exceptions for political pragmatism and national security. Reagan also backed, long before NAFTA, a North American free-trade area,” the WSJ Editorial Board wrote.


********************************


In case you missed it:

"The White House on Tuesday fired all six members of the Commission of Fine Arts, an independent federal agency that would have reviewed President Donald Trump’s ballroom construction project, a White House official confirmed to NBC News."


Trump, the autocrat, doesn't have to answer to ANYONE now after bulldozing the East Wing.

Are you happy with this everyone?

And how would you have reacted had former presidents, say, Obama or Biden, done such a shocking thing?

You okay with this?

Tuesday, October 28, 2025

TRUMP'S AMERICA:

 


I live in a country where young Republicans joke about loving Hitler; where a sitting president keeps musing about going for an illegal, anti-Constitutional 3rd term; where people are being beaten and disappeared from our streets without due process; where a sitting POTUS orders the murder of people in boats in international water; where a sitting president took a wrecking ball to the nation's White House without any consultation with proper historical committees (and who lied to the American people when he promised that no part of the WH would be touched!); where Americans' health care is in jeopardy because the Republican Party wants to kill the ACA ---

And the Party of Trump is going after a legal American citizen because he is on track to become the mayor of one of America's greatest cities, and Trumpers don't like his politics.



House Republicans want to strip Zohran Mamdani of his citizenship — and maybe deport him. That sentence should stop you cold. A sitting state lawmaker, now the frontrunner for New York City mayor, being targeted not for corruption or espionage, but for belonging to the wrong political movement.
That’s where we are.

The absurdity would almost be laughable if it weren’t so chilling.
Because this isn’t about Mamdani’s paperwork. It’s about the rebirth of a dangerous idea — that citizenship is not a right, but a privilege granted only to the “right kind” of American.
Representatives Randy Fine of Florida and Andy Ogles of Tennessee have asked the Justice Department to investigate Mamdani’s path to naturalization and to consider revoking his citizenship. Ogles even went so far as to post “Deport Mamdani!” — accusing him of being a “communist who will destroy New York.”
Their justification? That Mamdani joined the Democratic Socialists of America, and once called to free the “Holy Land Five,” a group of Palestinian-American charity leaders imprisoned since 2008. In their eyes, that’s enough to make him an “enemy within.”

Fair or not?