This is the “unspoken” rules of our ideology. ”You may not criticize a minority (unless their white skinned or (R) or MAGA). In those specific cases, we give you permission. All those who violate this rule will be cancelled.”
The writer of this complaint conveniently (or purposefully?) doesn't mention how the MAGAs cancel bona fide conservative members of their own clan, without "prosecutorial discretion."
If you're not slavishly loyal to Trump (even when he commits crimes), you're out, you're shunned, you're exiled from the Party!
Remember what happened to Liz Cheney? Adam Kinzinger? the late John McCain? Mitt Romney? Charlie Baker? Paul Ryan? Nikki Haley? John Kelly? Mike Esper? Cassidy Hutchinson?
The list goes on and on.
The person who wrote the above bolded and italicized quote ignores the fact the the BIGGEST enforcers of non-diversity, equity, and inclusion will throw your Republican posterior out of the Party UNLESS you pledge allegiance to Trump and his MAGAs.
Conservatives who put country first are not welcome in the new Trumpublican Party. You may not criticize Trump, an adjudicated rapist and tax fraudster. Remember, all those who violate this rule will be cancelled, as Liz Cheney and others have found out. Diversity in the Trumpian Party BE DAMNED! This is the unspoken rule of the Trumpian ideology. Worship him or you're OUT! Only unquestioning sycophants are allowed.
All those who violate this rule have been and will be cancelled. Any other Conservative or American who puts country over Party need not apply for membership in this Toadying to Trump Party!
PS. White-skinned Americans are NOT a minority in this country. (Yet.)
19 comments:
Trump: "I wouldn't want to be a member of a club that would accept me!" Bwahahahaha!
Loyal to Trump? 'F Trump. My oath is to the Constitution, not its' Executive.
PS - Neocon Republicans for Ukraine are not putting America first. Their putting global weapons sales and banking interests first.
FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said... "Loyal to Trump? 'F Trump. My oath is to the Constitution, not its' Executive."
That's nice to know. But that's not what this post is about.
This is about duplicity. The writer of the quote in bold and italics is whining about how DEI doesn't allow for opposing views. If you have them, you're out, especially if you're a Black conservative, or have a dissenting/conservative opinion in a traditionally Liberal workplace/university/etc.
And what happened to the bona fide Conservative who had a differing opinion on what sort of character Donald Trump has?
They. Got. Kicked. Out. Of. Their. Congressional. Seats.
The current Republican/Trumpublian Party will not tolerate anyone who does not worship Trump.
That's what this is about-- the inability for the writer of that complaint about DEI to see what's in front of his nose.
No, you didn't post my "unwritten rule" post. The Trump supporters "unwritten rule" is "US Constitution first". SJW's and Unlimited Government bureaucrats and *ss-kissers, 'f off!"
-FJ
"The Trump supporters "unwritten rule" is "US Constitution first".
Very funny.
How do they square that professed loyalty to the Constitution when they support Trump who threatens our Bill of Rights?
TRUMP: “With all of the Fake News coming out of NBC and the Networks, at what point is it appropriate to challenge their License? Bad for country!”
TRUMP: "Trump added that “it is frankly disgusting the press is able to write whatever it wants to write”
Trump doesn't like the way media treat him, so he calls what they do "disgusting," because he's a malignant narcissist and a broken human being who cannot take ANY unfavorable opinions about him whether those opinions come from media, media personalities, even the POTUS who beat him in the last election. Trump is a whiney little putz who'd use the power of the presidency to stop media from criticizing him. Just like Orban, who he admires, has done.
First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;
It's frankly disgusting to hear Trump make these unConstitutional rants, and see that you and your pals pretend Trump doesn't threaten our guaranteed Constitutional rights.
This:
Trump to underline his support for school prayer as he courts evangelicals--Politico, 1/16/2020
Which prayers?
Did Trump encourage Muslim prayer? Satanist prayers? Hindu prayers? Pantheist prayers?
Every school child can pray to his/her hearts' content. The Constitution does not allow for only ONE religions' prayers to be led by public school authorities. If Trump wants to force prayers in school, he will have to allow for EVERY RELIGION THAT EXISTS IN THIS COUNTRY to demand that school children recite those prayers as well.
Constitution first?
What happened to allowing the certification of the electoral count? Those Constitution-loving Trump supporters tried to overthrow an election.
And they called for HANGING THE VICE PRESIDENT OF THE US.
Gee. That doesn't sound like something Constitution-loving Trumpers would do, does it.
Bill of Rights? Eavesdropping and Censoring the US population is a government duty? Who knew?
It would be beyond hilarious if it were not so damned sad. America may very well not survive as a democratic republic. If it doesn't the Constitution becomes just what tRump and the tRump- republican party want it to be, a soiled crumpled scrap of useless paper.
Whatever, it is not worth the time, energy, or concern anymore to even care.
Too many dumbasses want a dictator who is concerned only about his narcissistic ass and nothing else. As well as a stupid anti American R party that is as ignorant as a box of rocks.
Simply put... it's time to check out and entirely forget about politics and the ignorance and delusions that drives it.
Constitution first?
Here's how Trump views it...
“A Massive Fraud of this type [Trump's unproven lie about the elections of 2020] and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,” he wrote. “Our great ‘Founders’ did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!”
No Mr Trump and your deluded followers. You're appealing to a non existent "Massive Fraud". It never happened. You and your minions have never proved it, despite all your efforts.
And now you claim that false hope, the Big Lie as justification to allow for the "termination" of the Constitution.
And -FJ and your millions of minions somehow believe you support that Constitution that you state you want to "terminate."
Rich stuff from these folks Shaw...
Democrats, saving the world from <a href='https://youtu.be/j__ocnDLAj0?si=dcoVvVcfuqTfjWtQ">extremist gamers</a> by ripping up the Constitution. CIA's gotta know when their next raid is scheduled.
Joe Conservative,
You didn’t address the fact that Donald Trump would “terminate” the Constitution, those are his words. And you or your alter ego wrote that Trumpers put the Constitution first. Apparently Trump doesn’t.
MAGAts are despicable scum.
You didn't read Trump's "termination" comment. He's saying, "That is what the Democrats have done". And he's right. Democrats have terminated the Constitution. We no longer have "negative liberty", only a Democratic Party vision of POSITIVE liberty, where everyone has to live "their way".
Yeah. Right, -FJ. That's why the Conservative-driven SCOTUS undid 50 years of settled law, said abortion rights should be left to the states, and then Trump promised to pass a federal law abolishing all abortion rights for the whole country.
Who's trying to force their opinion on when life begins? On IVF? On contraception? On school prayer? On what books can or cannot be read? On pretending J6 was nothing more than a "protest" by friendly "tourists?"
We don't buy your cries of victimhood. Sorry.
-FJ said... He's [Trump] saying, "That is what the Democrats have done".
Except -FJ, that's a lie. And it's been shown again, and again, and again.
For about the millionth time, here we go again...
Every single Sec of State in the US, every Governor in the US, over 60 courts, the Trump Administration, and a majority of Congress disagree with you.
There's been no evidence presented of fraud to the extent that the US elections of 2020 can be the "Massive Fraud of this type..." that Trump, you and the rest of the election denial folks allege.
As we always say, you ARE entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts. Just saying it louder, which is what conspiracy cranks from the "No moon landing" crowd to the "flat earthers" to the "Wilt never scored 100 points" folks seem to be doing.
Trump promised to pass a federal law abolishing all abortion
...and HOW is he supposed to accomplish THAT. You really think he can get a majority of the Legislature to PASS such a law? And Courts to uphold it? LOL!
"Loyal to Trump? 'F Trump. My oath is to the Constitution, not its' Executive."
How is supporting Trump's criminal attempts to steal the election in any way align with an oath to the Constitution?
Still waiting for -FJ to show me the evidence that Trump won, BTW.
Say, -FJ, while you're looking for evidence the election was "stollen", why don't you let us know when America was "great" before 2016 and how Trump would take us back to that time?
How will we ever know when it was great, if you can't tell us?
My, there's SO much you can't say, isn't there? Just deflections galore.
You can't even support your inane statement that "Democrats have terminated the Constitution", as you shill for a criminal to be dictator.
No answers expected. Just deflections or silence, amirite?
-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...
Trump promised to pass a federal law abolishing all abortion
"...and HOW is he supposed to accomplish THAT.
You really think he can get a majority of the Legislature to PASS such a law? And Courts to uphold it? LOL!"
Do you mean to point out that Trump is lying to his cultists about instituting a federal abortion ban?
Well, maybe YOU don't know how he could accomplish that, but other people do:
"What is plausible is that, returned to the White House, Donald Trump would seek to use his executive power — power that his allies are aiming to increase on his behalf— to further curtail abortion access."--Mary Ziegler. Ziegler is a law professor and a 2023-24 Guggenheim fellow. She is the author of “Roe: The History of a National Obsession.”
"A new Trump administration could force the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to remove mifepristone — one of two drugs most commonly used in medication abortions — from the market. Such a change would affect abortions in all states, including where the procedure is legal. Historically, the FDA has been treated in Washington as a federal agency more insulated from partisan politics. A second Trump tenure could test that.
Already, anti-abortion activists have been pushing for this, most prominently through a lawsuit filed in Texas set to be argued March 26 at the Supreme Court.
"...removing mifepristone is the centerpiece of anti-abortion strategy laid out by Roger Severino, who headed the HHS Office of Civil Rights in Trump’s previous administration and is now a vice president at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank that has shaped the GOP’s agenda for decades." --19th News Organization
"Some anti-abortion organizations and lawmakers have argued that emergency contraception is considered an “abortifacient,” and should be similarly restricted — a characterization echoed by the Heritage Foundation papers. Students for Life, the anti-abortion group, has been specifically critical of the continued legality of hormonal birth control pills.
“If it’s the position of people at Heritage or former Trump administration officials that emergency contraception is an abortifacient, or hormonal birth control pill is, then they could try to apply Comstock to those,” Ziegler said.
Medically, using neither emergency contraception nor hormonal birth control is considered terminating a pregnancy."
Dave Dubya said...
"How is supporting Trump's criminal attempts to steal the election in any way align with an oath to the Constitution?"
To this day, -FJ, his cohorts at the Mother Ship, and ed bonderenka still claim without showing any evidence that 2020 election stolen.
It's pretty apparent to a lot of sane people why they do it. It's the same reason why Trump continues to lie about a "stollen" election:
Josef Goebbels: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
Trump was "The State" when he began his Big Lie in 2020. He was still the POTUS until the next year. Trump = The State. What happened to the people who did not believe and spread Trump/State's lie? They were exiled and thrown out of the Party.
Trump falsely claimed that the only way he could lose the 2020 election was if it was rigged or stolen. He has used this lie as the only way he could lose ANYTHING! Since forever. He claimed the voting was rigged when he didn't win an Emmy for his TV show. He said the Iowa Caucuses were "rigged" when Ted Cruz beat him in 2016:
"Donald Trump’s moment of humility didn’t last long. The billionaire businessman, still licking his wounds after a decisive loss in Iowa on Monday, is now crying foul, accusing Ted Cruz of stealing the election and calling for a do-over.+ -- Politico, 2/3/2016
Any time Trump loses to anyone, he accuses the person who beat him of "rigging and stealing."
And to this day, people like -FJ and the rest don't understand how they're Trump's marks for blindly swallowing his Big Lie about the 2020 election.
Post a Comment