Paul Revere by Cyrus Dallin, North End, Boston

~~~

~~~

Wednesday, February 14, 2024

HE'S WHINING AGAIN!

 


Trump wrote this pathetic piece on his Truth Social platform. Can you imagine any other serious politician or leader taking the time to write about a pop star and her boyfriend football player?

This brings pettiness, jealousy, and petulance to a whole new level. 

Trump wants to be the POTUS, and again he shows us what a small-minded, pettifogging little sniveler he actually is, wasting his time commenting on pop culture personalities.

When he isn't inviting Russia to attack our NATO allies, he's busy complaining that popular culture stars don't pay him enough obeisance.

Everything, EVERYTHING is always about him.







28 comments:

Joe Conservative said...

By the content of your post I can tell that everything really is "all about him".

Joe Conservative said...

...now, would you like some cheese to go with your whine?

Les Carpenter said...

Reminiscent of a third grade spoiled brat alright. But, the Trump minority MAGAverse loves the whittle crybaby.

Shaw Kenawe said...

Joe Conservative said...

"By the content of your post I can tell that everything really is 'all about him'."

You're damn right it is. That Liar, Cheater, Fraud, Sexual Assaulter/Rapist, Insurrectionist, and anti-American Russia Suck-Up wants to be POTUS again.

Meanwhile, speaking of "everything really is about..." Obsessed much?



Joe Conservative said...

Touche!

But in my case the hypocrisy is performative, not "authentic" or "sincere". I think Michelle (w/o Barrack) would make a great president.

Joe Conservative said...

There's a class divide in America. The camoflauge of racial resentment used by the 'elites' as cover is fading...

Shaw Kenawe said...

Donald J. Trump is the epitome of a coastal elite.

The working class folks who believe he cares about them are deluded. The biggest gift to billionaires was Trump's tax cuts that are permanent, but will end for the middle and working classes. How elitey elite is that!

Trump was born into wealth and grew up in wealth. Wealth got him into university and out of serving his country. Wealth got banks and bankers to believe in his business acumen; wealth got him lawyers to get out of paying contractors what he owed them; and wealth allowed him to pay off porn stars and playboy bunnies so they wouldn't talk about his infidelity to his 3rd wife while giving birth to his 5th child, and that was done so that the Evangelical Christians would look upon him as the Immaculate Deception that he is.

It is DJT's elite cover that is fading. After all, when you're facing 91 criminal indictments and when you're found liable for sexual assault/rape and tax fraud, the cover starts to rot and expose what you really, really are -- An amoral conman who knows nothing about governing or being a decent human being.

It's not envy, jealousy or any philosophical hogwash you want to throw at the reasons we're disgusted over watching millions of our fellow Americans fawn over this phony pile of orange fumes.




Thersites said...

Like I've said before, it isn't DJT Trump, it's what he represents. The right to do whatever you want without a meddlesome government intervening. The more "opposition" his candidacy receives, the more the symbolism grows. So please, throw on some more ridiculous indictments.
:)

Thersites said...

DJT has become a "signifier". Better learn some sign language.

Thersites said...

Earth to elites, "we aren't paying for your wars anymore, and we aren't going to die for you anymore. You're on your own!"

ps - The checkout line starts to the right.

Shaw Kenawe said...

Thersites said...

"Like I've said before, it isn't DJT Trump, it's what he represents. The right to do whatever you want without a meddlesome government intervening."

Oh really?

Trump Calls for Government to Punish MSNBC Over Reporting on Him He Doesn’t Like

"Political observers have noted that Trump’s words echo comments by fascist leaders of the past.

ormer President Donald Trump demanded on his social media platform earlier this week that the government shut down MSNBC News over the network’s criticism of his statements.

Trump’s Truth Social post wrongly claimed that the network is broadcast over the air, thus warranting the government regulation he sought. But the channel is actually a cable news station, and therefore not subject to rules implemented by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that apply to over-the-air stations."


Trump wants to run the government, and he doesn't know how government works, except if there's anything he doesn't like in the private sector, he'll sic the government on it if he's POTUS!

How's that for Trump "not meddling?"


And this little fascist fantasy of his:

Donald Trump says if elected in 2024 he might prosecute political opponents--USA TODAY



Trump brags about role in overturning Roe v. Wade but urges GOP caution on abortion

Government meddling? How about the girls and women who want to choose what to do when a pregnancy goes wrong and endangers their health or lives; or when they're 10 years old and their "funny uncle" rapes them; or when they have reasons that are NOT your or anyone else's g-d business? Government ENFORCED pregnancies.


Do you EVER listen to or read his fascistic fantasies for when he's back in power? Ever?

Or are you going to dismiss them as "He's just kidding?"

"When someone shows you who they are, believe them." --Maya Angelou

It is astounding that anyone would post that Trump is for getting the government out of our lives so we can do whatever we want when the words from his own mouth say the EXACT opposite.



Dave Dubya said...

To Kremlin agent -FJ/Thersites/Joe Con and anyone foolish enough to not see through his agenda.
~~
https://twitter.com/denvercunning/status/1757627424894845292

From:
Bryan Cunningham
Executive Director
University of California, Irvine
Cybersecurity Policy & Research Institute

MEGA MAGA DON'T BE GASLIT! (Bear With Me to the end). As a career, non-partisan, intelligence professional, I actually don't know whether Trump, Speaker Johnson, and some of the MAGA bootlicking Senators are ACTUALLY recruited assets of Putin's Intelligence Services....

But what I know FOR CERTAIN is that they could no more be doing Putin's bidding if they WERE directly under Russian intelligence control. Ask ANY serious intelligence professional what KGB Putin would want of high-ranking USG spies and they would say...

1. Get the US out of NATO.
2. Invite Russia to invade Western Europe.
3. Stoke and amplify all divisions in America, along racial, ethnic, & religious fissures (i.e., make us hate each other).
4. Undermine Americans' trust in all of our institutions: FBI, CIA, DOJ, the Courts and our heroic Military.

CHECK, CHECK, CHECK and CHECK.

Are you starting to get it yet New Putin Simps? The "Art of the Deal"-maker and his bootlickers are GIVING EVERYTHING TO PUTIN FOR FREE. Great deal, eh? We ARE being invaded-not by immigrants but by Putin's propaganda, fueled by MAGA. And REMEMBER: As bad as illegal immigration is, they don't have nukes. Putin does.

WAKE. THE. FU@K UP!

~~~
Russian operative -FJ/Thersites/Joe Con HATES America and our system of democratic representation with voting and civil rights. He HATES our Constitution and it's provisions for taxes, regulation of commerce, and provision for the general welfare.

He's doing EXACTLY what Putin wants him to do. Nobody here can rationally dispute this.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

“MSNBC (MSDNC) uses FREE government approved airwaves,” the former president falsely alleged, “and yet it is nothing but a 24 hour hit job on Donald J. Trump and the Republican Party for purposes of ELECTION INTERFERENCE.”

Isn't the Government supposed to be politically non-partisan? So why isn't it protecting/ censoring for Trump like it does for Biden?

Sounds like pretty legit criticism of government's malfeasance.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

btw - Why is the medical industry allowed to "meddle" in a woman's body but not the government?

I can't wait until the 1st biological born-man actually gets pregnant and carries an infant to term.

I have a right...

Les Carpenter said...

I really, really appreciate the delusional BS folks like Thersites et all spread daily. Their attachment to, and support of, an elitist narcissistic American POS is all anyone needs to know to know that they in fact, support the anti American, pro authoritarian, pro Russian asset POS.

Intelligent or educated folks see right through their ignorant rationalizations for the orange hued human orangutan's behaviors. I figure the more they protest in support of this garbage the greater likelihood fewer and fewer people will ultimately vote for the bug stupid turd.9

Shaw Kenawe said...

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

"btw - Why is the medical industry allowed to "meddle" in a woman's body but not the government?"

Are you being deliberately obtuse?

A medical person/industry gets PERMISSION to perform a medical procedure on a woman. She seeks that medical intervention when she needs it. The "medical industry" doesn't come into her home or body unless she seeks its help.

Before I've had any procedure done in a doctor's office or the hospital, I SIGN OFF on it, understanding what the risks are. No one in any doctor's office or hospital touches or invades my body without my permission. And no hospital has the authority to keep me there if I want to leave.

Right now the government has meddled in women's and girls' bodies by preventing them from getting medical care for pregnancies that have gone wrong. The government has taken control of girls' and women's bodies. The ULTIMATE "meddling."

PS. Don't bring up vaccines. Americans have the right to refuse vaccines. That's been going on for decades. If you work for the government or a private company that requires/required vaccinations for employment, you could decline working there and leave.

Before all this anti-vaccine nonsense, military people were required to get shots for all sorts of illnesses, and there was no controversy. Same with children entering school and the requirement for vaccines. This was NEVER an issue when I was a school kid, nor when my kids were in school.

This country has lost its mind -- or rather a huge number of ill-informed people have.

Shaw Kenawe said...

Dave Dubya

Very excellent. I saw this today and thought of posting it. Thanks for putting it up here.

I never thought I'd see the day when the anti-Soviet Republican Party would admire and embrace a brutal ex-KGB agent and see him as some sort of hero.

That superb useful idiot, Tucker Carlson, actually said that Moscow is better than any American city he's ever been in.

And the MAGAs can't get enough of it.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

And isn't it the Government's job to REGULATE the medical industry? To prevent HARMFUL or DANGEROUS or LIFE (ie abortion) threatening procedures from being performed.

Leaving the choice to women. When new procedures are developed, mod/ genetic modifications, are these decisions also going to be left up to me? Genital mutilations/ clitorectomies (Islamic) to parents? Circumcisions (Jewish).

Outlawing abortion doesn't affect women. It affects the medical industry. Women have no "right" to seek abortion. it's a medical privilege.

Shaw Kenawe said...

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said... "And isn't it the Government's job to REGULATE the medical industry? To prevent HARMFUL or DANGEROUS or LIFE (ie abortion)"threatening procedures from being performed.

Wrong again.

Objective: To assess the safety of abortion compared with childbirth.

Methods: We estimated mortality rates associated with live births and legal induced abortions in the United States in 1998-2005. We used data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System, birth certificates, and Guttmacher Institute surveys. In addition, we searched for population-based data comparing the morbidity of abortion and childbirth.

Results: The pregnancy-associated mortality rate among women who delivered live neonates was 8.8 deaths per 100,000 live births. The mortality rate related to induced abortion was 0.6 deaths per 100,000 abortions. In the one recent comparative study of pregnancy morbidity in the United States, pregnancy-related complications were more common with childbirth than with abortion.

Conclusion: Legal induced abortion is markedly safer than childbirth. The risk of death associated with childbirth is approximately 14 times higher than that with abortion. Similarly, the overall morbidity associated with childbirth exceeds that with abortion.

-FJ: "Outlawing abortion doesn't affect women. It affects the medical industry. Women have no "right" to seek abortion. it's a medical privilege."

That doesn't deserve an answer because it is a stupidly fallacious statement.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

Abortion as a "medical procedure" is ALWAYS 100% deadly to the child on the receiving end.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

...and the child's "rights" begin the moment sperm touches egg. :)

Shaw Kenawe said...

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...
"Abortion as a "medical procedure" is ALWAYS 100% deadly to the child on the receiving end."

It's a fetus, not a child. If it were truly a "child" under the law, you'd be able to deduct it. You cannot, until it is born and becomes a "child" under the law. When you count the number of children in a household, the fetus in the mother's uterus is not counted as a child in the household.

That's the end of this discussion. I know you are anti-abortion. I'm not trying to change your mind.

No more hijacking this thread.

Shaw Kenawe said...

FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

"...and the child's "rights" begin the moment sperm touches egg. :)"

1) there is no federal law that says that a fetus is a person.

2) the Constitution grants constitutional rights to people “WHO ARE BORN OR NATURALIZED”. The key word there is BORN.


You're talking about a particular RELIGIOUS dogma. Not all religions agree on that either.

Our laws are based on the US Constitution, not anyone's holy book.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

So why do they charge people who murder pregnant women with 2 counts?

It is a puzzlement. :(

Dave Dubya said...

Kremlin agent -FJ is struggling to show the appearance of a compassionate person who values every life. Mr. "Family values".

It's bullshit, of course.

He doesn't give a damn about anybody. Like Trump and every sociopath it's only about triggering others while exerting power and control over people he disrespects or hates.

Or is it envy? ;-) -FJ can't bear a child, can he?

But he damn well wants to CONTROL a woman's personal decision and DENY her the freedom of choice.

This is his authoritarian personality on display again.

Les Carpenter said...

So -fj, the moment sperm touches egg a human life has not developed at that moment. No brain. No heart. No liver. No pancreas. No kidneys. No thyroid. No reproductive organs. No lungs. No eyes. No ears. No nose. No mouth. No appendages, etc. Just a a couple of cells ready to eventually become a living human form with all those necessary organs that are required and neccessary to support a human life form.

At the stage you stated no human life form has yet even begun to form. And as Shaw aptly points out there is no law states a fetus is a person and the Constitution protects the rights of a born or naturalized citizen.

Time ya realized that a blob of cells is simply not a developed vialiable human life form. Period.

Now, go talk to your RCC representative to complain.

Les Carpenter said...

BTW, it's easy -fj to piss and moan about situations you think you know something about but in reality you know nothing about. Which is exactly why it is beyond the purview of a man to make one of the most difficult decisions a women ever has to make.

IOW's -fj, mind yer on goddamn business. Not that of those you know about.

Dave Dubya said...


-Fj is puzzled that a murderer is charged with two counts if he murdered the mother and her anticipated offspring.

Not that he gives a damn.

Unlike abortion, this is a crime against both her life and her reproductive right to a child. Two offenses.

Maybe this will clarify:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1841